Quantitative evaluation of all hexamers as exonic splicing elements

  1. Lawrence A. Chasin1,5
  1. 1Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA;
  2. 2Genome Center, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, USA;
  3. 3Department of Chemical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA
    • 4 Present address: Department of Environmental Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016.

    Abstract

    We describe a comprehensive quantitative measure of the splicing impact of a complete set of RNA 6-mer sequences by deep sequencing successfully spliced transcripts. All 4096 6-mers were substituted at five positions within two different internal exons in a 3-exon minigene, and millions of successfully spliced transcripts were sequenced after transfection of human cells. The results allowed the assignment of a relative splicing strength score to each mutant molecule. The effect of 6-mers on splicing often depended on their location; much of this context effect could be ascribed to the creation of different overlapping sequences at each site. Taking these overlaps into account, the splicing effect of each 6-mer could be quantified, and 6-mers could be designated as enhancers (ESEseqs) and silencers (ESSseqs), with an ESRseq score indicating their strength. Some 6-mers exhibited positional bias relative to the two splice sites. The distribution and conservation of these ESRseqs in and around human exons supported their classification. Predicted RNA secondary structure effects were also seen: Effective enhancers, silencers and 3′ splice sites tend to be single stranded, and effective 5′ splice sites tend to be double stranded. 6-mers that may form positive or negative synergy with another were also identified. Chromatin structure may also influence the splicing enhancement observed, as a good correspondence was found between splicing performance and the predicted nucleosome occupancy scores of 6-mers. This approach may prove of general use in defining nucleic acid regulatory motifs, substitute for functional SELEX in most cases, and provide insights about splicing mechanisms.

    Footnotes

    • Received December 20, 2010.
    • Accepted April 28, 2011.
    | Table of Contents

    Preprint Server