Psychological adjustment to familial genetic risk assessment: differences in two longitudinal samples

Patient Educ Couns. 2000 May;40(2):163-72. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(99)00082-8.

Abstract

Heritable cancer risk assessment is an increasingly common method of deriving valuable information relevant to deciding on appropriate screening regimens and preventive treatments. Assessments of heritable risk typically include familial-genetic evaluation, where analyses relate family pedigree to cancer risk, and DNA testing, where analyses indicate genetic mutations associated with cancer risk (e.g., BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations) or their absence. In this paper we report on the psychological responses of women given familial-genetic evaluations for ovarian cancer risk. The baseline and 6 to 12 follow-up assessments of an initial clinic-attending cohort of 65 women are compared with the baseline and 9 to 12 follow-up assessments of a second clinic-attending cohort of 60 women. Sizeable differences were found in the prevalence of clinically significant depression in these two physician or self-referred populations, as assessed by the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale and in the mean scores. Hypotheses accounting for these differences are discussed.

MeSH terms

  • Adaptation, Psychological*
  • Cohort Studies
  • Family Health
  • Female
  • Genetic Predisposition to Disease / psychology*
  • Genetic Testing / psychology*
  • Humans
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Ovarian Neoplasms / genetics*
  • Ovarian Neoplasms / psychology*