Attitudes about disclosing the identities of family members to a physician to ensure diffusion of genetic risk information within affected families were examined in a questionnaire study of Danish patients with alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency (A1AD), their relatives, and a control group of Danish citizens. The questionnaires were returned by 1,761 (82%) of 2,146 recipients; 1,609 (75%) agreed to participate and completed the questionnaire. Only 2.8% objected to disclosing the identity of children, 9.1% objected to disclosing the identity of parents, and 6.7% objected to disclosing the identity of siblings. When genetic tests are offered to a sister, 75.4% of screened individuals with severe A1AD (phenotype "piZ") and 66.8% of piZ probands thought that the physician should say who is ill. Important reasons for informing a sister at risk were, for 58%, the opportunity to prevent disease and, for 41% of piZ-probands, the opportunity to maintain openness in the family and to avoid uncertainty. Stepwise logistic regression of background variables showed that relatives were those for whom most respondents approved the disclosure of the parents' and siblings' identities to enable the physician to examine them for the presence of A1AD. Women were less prone to disclose the identity of siblings. The results indicate that the genetic counselor should inquire about relatives' identities, to ensure that they are properly informed about the known risk of severe genetic disorder, such as A1AD, for which disability can be prevented by a change of lifestyle or by careful management. Disease prevention is essential, but openness and avoidance of uncertainty in affected families are also important. Our findings imply that fully informing all relatives about the disorder and about who is actually ill should be the principal rule.