Gastroenterology

Gastroenterology

Volume 147, Issue 6, December 2014, Pages 1308-1316.e1
Gastroenterology

Original Research
Full Report: Clinical—Alimentary Tract
Colon and Endometrial Cancers With Mismatch Repair Deficiency Can Arise From Somatic, Rather Than Germline, Mutations

https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2014.08.041Get rights and content

Background & Aims

Patients with Lynch syndrome carry germline mutations in single alleles of genes encoding the mismatch repair (MMR) proteins MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2; when the second allele becomes mutated, cancer can develop. Increased screening for Lynch syndrome has identified patients with tumors that have deficiency in MMR, but no germline mutations in genes encoding MMR proteins. We investigated whether tumors with deficient MMR had acquired somatic mutations in patients without germline mutations in MMR genes using next-generation sequencing.

Methods

We analyzed blood and tumor samples from 32 patients with colorectal or endometrial cancer who participated in Lynch syndrome screening studies in Ohio and were found to have tumors with MMR deficiency (based on microsatellite instability and/or absence of MMR proteins in immunohistochemical analysis, without hypermethylation of MLH1), but no germline mutations in MMR genes. Tumor DNA was sequenced for MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, EPCAM, POLE, and POLD1 with ColoSeq and mutation frequencies were established.

Results

Twenty-two of 32 patients (69%) were found to have 2 somatic (tumor) mutations in MMR genes encoding proteins that were lost from tumor samples, based on immunohistochemistry. Of the 10 remaining tumors 3 had one somatic mutation in a MMR gene, with possible loss of heterozygosity that could lead to MMR deficiency, 6 were found to be false-positive results (19%), and 1 had only one mutation in a MMR gene and remained unexplained. All of the tumors found to have somatic MMR mutations were of the hypermutated phenotype (>12 mutations/megabase); 6 had mutation frequencies >200/megabase, and 5 of these had somatic mutations in POLE, which encodes a DNA polymerase.

Conclusions

Some patients are found to have tumors with MMR defects during screening for Lynch syndrome, yet have no identifiable germline mutations in MMR genes. We found that almost 70% of these patients acquire somatic mutations in MMR genes, leading to a hypermutated phenotype of tumor cells. Patients with colon or endometrial cancers with MMR deficiency not explained by germline mutations might undergo analysis for tumor mutations in MMR genes to guide future surveillance guidelines.

Section snippets

Patients

Patients from the previously published Columbus Lynch syndrome study1, 3 and the ongoing state-wide prospective Lynch syndrome screening study in Ohio (OCCPI)14 were included. Both studies included patients with newly diagnosed colorectal and endometrial cancer, regardless of age at diagnosis or family history. The research protocol and consent form were approved by the Institutional Review Board at each participating hospital, and all patients provided written informed consent. Patients with

Patient Characteristics

A total of 32 patients with either colorectal or endometrial cancer (see Table 1 for patient characteristics) were screened for somatic mutations using ColoSeq, 22 from the Columbus Lynch syndrome study (21% of unexplained colorectal cancer cases and 38% of unexplained endometrial cancer cases) and 10 from the OCCPI (100% of unexplained cases on the study; see Supplementary Figures 1 and 2 for screening outcomes). All of these patients had previously tested negative for MMR germline mutations

Discussion

In one of the largest population-based screening studies for Lynch syndrome in colorectal1 and endometrial cancer,3 3.9% of all screened patients had MMR-deficient tumors that were not explained by germline mutations, leaving the treating physician and the patient unsure of the implications of an abnormal screening test. This study confirms that most of these cases can be explained by 2 somatic tumor mutations. The abnormal screening tests were explained by tumor MMR gene mutations in 69% of

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Christina Smith, Karen Koehler, Mallory Beightol, Shelby Flowers, and Tatyana Marushchak for performing genomic library preparation and sequencing, Angela Jacobson and Dr Robert Livingston for help with research coordination, Dr Brian Shirts and Dr Tom Walsh for assistance with variant interpretation, and Dr Stephen Salipante, Dr Emily Turner, and Sheena Scroggins for help with bioinformatics. The authors would also like to thank Dr C. Richard Boland and Dr Jennifer Rhees at

References (31)

  • Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: genetic testing strategies in newly diagnosed individuals with colorectal cancer aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality from Lynch syndrome in relatives

    Genet Med

    (2009)
  • L.C. Beamer et al.

    Reflex immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability testing of colorectal tumors for lynch syndrome among us cancer programs and follow-up of abnormal results

    J Clin Oncol

    (2012)
  • M.J.L. Ligtenberg et al.

    Heritable somatic methylation and inactivation of MSH2 in families with Lynch syndrome due to deletion of the 3[prime] exons of TACSTD1

    Nat Genet

    (2009)
  • J. Rhees et al.

    Inversion of exons 1–7 of the MSH2 gene is a frequent cause of unexplained Lynch syndrome in one local population

    Fam Cancer

    (2013)
  • M. Rodríguez-Soler et al.

    Risk of cancer in cases of suspected Lynch syndrome without germline mutation

    Gastroenterology

    (2013)
  • Cited by (301)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Conflicts of interest This author discloses the following: Heather Hampel has received research funding from Myriad Genetic Laboratories. The remaining authors disclose no conflicts.

    Funding This study was supported by grants from Pelotonia and the National Cancer Institute (CA16058 and CA67941).

    Author names in bold designate shared co-first authorship.

    View full text