Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Non-coding RNAs as regulators of embryogenesis

Nature Reviews Genetics volume 12, pages 136–149 (2011)Cite this article

Subjects

Key Points

  • Genome-wide transcriptome analyses have demonstrated that a large fraction of the genome is transcribed. Many newly identified transcripts do not to encode proteins but function as non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs).

  • Both small ncRNAs (for example, microRNAs (miRNAs)) and large ncRNAs (for example, large intergenic ncRNAs (lincRNAs)) have emerged as important regulators of embryogenesis. Several ncRNAs promote developmental transitions and maintain developmental states.

  • Mutations in the miRNA biogenesis pathway have revealed global requirements for miRNAs during embryogenesis.

  • miRNAs sharpen and promote developmental transitions. For example, specific miRNAs accelerate the deadenylation and clearance of maternal mRNAs.

  • miRNAs regulate cell fate specification by modulating various signalling pathways.

  • miRNAs participate in bistable loops that stabilize alternative cell fate decisions. For example, let-7 and LIN28 establish a toggle switch between pluripotent and differentiated cell fates.

  • Long ncRNAs (lncRNAs) establish stably maintained chromatin states during imprinting and dosage compensation. The mammalian lncRNA Xist, for example, is essential for silencing one of the two X chromosomes in mammalian females.

  • lncRNAs can serve as scaffolds for the assembly of chromatin-modifying complexes and transcriptional regulators. For example, the lncRNA HOTAIR establishes a repressive chromatin state at multiple loci.

  • lncRNAs and miRNAs have important roles in the gene regulatory networks that govern cell fate specification (for example, neural development and differentiation) and morphogenesis (for example, the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition).

Abstract

Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) are emerging as key regulators of embryogenesis. They control embryonic gene expression by several means, ranging from microRNA-induced degradation of mRNAs to long ncRNA-mediated modification of chromatin. Many aspects of embryogenesis seem to be controlled by ncRNAs, including the maternal–zygotic transition, the maintenance of pluripotency, the patterning of the body axes, the specification and differentiation of cell types and the morphogenesis of organs. Drawing from several animal model systems, we describe two emerging themes for ncRNA function: promoting developmental transitions and maintaining developmental states. These examples also highlight the roles of ncRNAs in ensuring a robust commitment to one of two possible cell fates.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: miR-430 — a multitasking microRNA family during embryogenesis.
Figure 2: Regulation of pluripotency by microRNAs.
Figure 3: RNAs control alternative cell fate decisions.
Figure 4: Imprinting and dosage compensation.
Figure 5: RNAs modulate chromatin.
Figure 6: Non-coding RNAs regulate neural development.
Figure 7: Regulation of the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition by non-coding RNAs.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee, R. C., Feinbaum, R. L. & Ambros, V. The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14. Cell 75, 843–854 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wightman, B., Ha, I. & Ruvkun, G. Posttranscriptional regulation of the heterochronic gene lin-14 by lin-4 mediates temporal pattern formation in C. elegans. Cell 75, 855–862 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown, C. J. et al. The human XIST gene: analysis of a 17 kb inactive X-specific RNA that contains conserved repeats and is highly localized within the nucleus. Cell 71, 527–542 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brockdorff, N. et al. The product of the mouse Xist gene is a 15 kb inactive X-specific transcript containing no conserved ORF and located in the nucleus. Cell 71, 515–526 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Borsani, G. et al. Characterization of a murine gene expressed from the inactive X chromosome. Nature 351, 325–329 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jacob, F. & Monod, J. Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 3, 318–356 (1961).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Britten, R. J. & Davidson, E. H. Gene regulation for higher cells: a theory. Science 165, 349–357 (1969).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mattick, J. S., Taft, R. J. & Faulkner, G. J. A global view of genomic information-moving beyond the gene and the master regulator. Trends Genet. 26, 21–28 (2009).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jacquier, A. The complex eukaryotic transcriptome: unexpected pervasive transcription and novel small RNAs. Nature Rev. Genet. 10, 833–844 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carninci, P. Molecular biology: the long and short of RNAs. Nature 457, 974–975 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mercer, T., Dinger, M. & Mattick, J. Long non-coding RNAs: insights into functions. Nature Rev. Genet. 10, 155–159 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bartel, D. P. MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell 136, 215–233 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bushati, N. & Cohen, S. M. microRNA functions. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 23, 175–205 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Koziol, M. J. & Rinn, J. L. RNA traffic control of chromatin complexes. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 20, 142–148 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Henderson, I. R. & Jacobsen, S. E. Epigenetic inheritance in plants. Nature 447, 418–424 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wollmann, H. & Weigel, D. Small RNAs in flower development. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 89, 250–257 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chitwood, D. H. & Timmermans, M. C. Small RNAs are on the move. Nature 467, 415–419 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Swiezewski, S., Liu, F., Magusin, A. & Dean, C. Cold-induced silencing by long antisense transcripts of an Arabidopsis Polycomb target. Nature 462, 799–802 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Okamura, K. & Lai, E. C. Endogenous small interfering RNAs in animals. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 673–678 (2008).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ghildiyal, M. & Zamore, P. D. Small silencing RNAs: an expanding universe. Nature Rev. Genet. 10, 94–108 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Giraldez, A. J. et al. MicroRNAs regulate brain morphogenesis in zebrafish. Science 308, 833–838 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Giraldez, A. J. et al. Zebrafish MiR-430 promotes deadenylation and clearance of maternal mRNAs. Science 312, 75–79 (2006). This study demonstrates that a single miRNA family promotes the concerted elimination of hundreds of maternal RNAs in zebrafish and thereby sharpens the transition between maternal and zygotic gene expression programmes. The authors furthermore show that miR-430 destabilizes target mRNAs by causing their deadenylation.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Choi, W.-Y., Giraldez, A. J. & Schier, A. F. Target protectors reveal dampening and balancing of Nodal agonist and antagonist by miR-430. Science 318, 271–274 (2007). This study provides evidence for the physiological role of specific miRNA–mRNA interactions. Interference with miR-430 targeting of the Nodal agonist and antagonist by 'target protectors' identifies essential roles for miR-430 in regulating this key embryonic signalling pathway.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang, Y., Medvid, R., Melton, C., Jaenisch, R. & Blelloch, R. DGCR8 is essential for microRNA biogenesis and silencing of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature Genet. 39, 380–385 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Suh, N. et al. MicroRNA function is globally suppressed in mouse oocytes and early embryos. Curr. Biol. 20, 271–277 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Tang, F. et al. Maternal microRNAs are essential for mouse zygotic development. Genes Dev. 21, 644–648 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Murchison, E. P. et al. Critical roles for Dicer in the female germline. Genes Dev. 21, 682–693 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Alvarez-Saavedra, E. & Horvitz, H. R. Many families of C. elegans microRNAs are not essential for development or viability. Curr. Biol. 20, 367–373 (2010). To date, this study provides the most comprehensive analyses of miRNA function in vivo . Loss-of-function mutants for individual as well as all members of redundantly acting miRNA families often revealed no or only subtle phenotypes. These results highlight the importance and challenge of miRNA loss-of-function analyses.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Brenner, J. L., Jasiewicz, K. L., Fahley, A. F., Kemp, B. J. & Abbott, A. L. Loss of individual microRNAs causes mutant phenotypes in sensitized genetic backgrounds in C. elegans. Curr. Biol. 20, 1321–1325 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Tadros, W. & Lipshitz, H. D. The maternal-to-zygotic transition: a play in two acts. Development 136, 3033–3042 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Schier, A. F. The maternal-zygotic transition: death and birth of RNAs. Science 316, 406–407 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lund, E., Liu, M., Hartley, R. S., Sheets, M. D. & Dahlberg, J. E. Deadenylation of maternal mRNAs mediated by miR-427 in Xenopus laevis embryos. RNA 15, 2351–2363 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Bushati, N., Stark, A., Brennecke, J. & Cohen, S. M. Temporal reciprocity of miRNAs and their targets during the maternal-to-zygotic transition in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 18, 501–506 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wu, E. et al. Pervasive and cooperative deadenylation of 3′UTRs by embryonic MicroRNA families. Mol. Cell 40, 558–570 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Rouget, C. et al. Maternal mRNA deadenylation and decay by the piRNA pathway in the early Drosophila embryo. Nature 467, 1128–1132 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Mishima, Y. et al. Differential regulation of germline mRNAs in soma and germ cells by zebrafish miR-430. Curr. Biol. 16, 2135–2142 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Kedde, M. et al. RNA-binding protein Dnd1 inhibits microRNA access to target mRNA. Cell 131, 1273–1286 (2007). This study describes one of the first examples for mechanisms that modulate miRNA activity. The conserved RNA-binding protein DND1 counteracts miRNA-mediated repression in human cells and zebrafish primordial germ cells.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Takeda, Y., Mishima, Y., Fujiwara, T., Sakamoto, H. & Inoue, K. DAZL relieves miRNA-mediated repression of germline mRNAs by controlling poly(A) tail length in zebrafish. PLoS ONE 4, e7513 (2009).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Kee, K., Angeles, V. T., Flores, M., Nguyen, H. N. & Reijo Pera, R. A. Human DAZL, DAZ and BOULE genes modulate primordial germ-cell and haploid gamete formation. Nature 462, 222–225 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Landgraf, P. et al. A mammalian microRNA expression atlas based on small RNA library sequencing. Cell 129, 1401–1414 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Bernstein, E. et al. Dicer is essential for mouse development. Nature Genet. 35, 215–217 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Murchison, E. P., Partridge, J. F., Tam, O. H., Cheloufi, S. & Hannon, G. J. Characterization of Dicer-deficient murine embryonic stem cells. Proc.Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 12135–12140 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Kanellopoulou, C. et al. Dicer-deficient mouse embryonic stem cells are defective in differentiation and centromeric silencing. Genes Dev. 19, 489–501 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang, Y. et al. Embryonic stem cell-specific microRNAs regulate the G1-S transition and promote rapid proliferation. Nature Genet. 40, 1478–1483 (2008). This paper provides compelling evidence that miRNAs are essential for ES cell self-renewal. Expression of a single miRNA family member of the ESCC miRNAs can rescue the proliferation defect of ES cells that lack mature miRNAs.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Judson, R. L., Babiarz, J. E., Venere, M. & Blelloch, R. Embryonic stem cell-specific microRNAs promote induced pluripotency. Nature Biotech. 27, 459–461 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Melton, C., Judson, R. L. & Blelloch, R. Opposing microRNA families regulate self-renewal in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature 463, 621–626 (2010). This study presents evidence that two opposing families of miRNAs control ES cell maintenance and differentiation. Self-renewal-promoting ESCC miRNAs (see also reference 44) are antagonized by let-7, which functions as a regulator of ES cell differentiation.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Johnson, C. D. et al. The let-7 microRNA represses cell proliferation pathways in human cells. Cancer Res. 67, 7713–7722 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Rybak, A. et al. The let-7 target gene mouse lin-41 is a stem cell specific E3 ubiquitin ligase for the miRNA pathway protein Ago2. Nature Cell Biol. 11, 1411–1420 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Wang, Y., Keys, D. N., Au-Young, J. K. & Chen, C. MicroRNAs in embryonic stem cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 218, 251–255 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Marson, A. et al. Connecting microRNA genes to the core transcriptional regulatory circuitry of embryonic stem cells. Cell 134, 521–533 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Xu, N., Papagiannakopoulos, T., Pan, G., Thomson, J. & Kosik, K. MicroRNA-145 regulates OCT4, SOX2, and KLF4 and represses pluripotency in human embryonic stem cells. Cell 137, 647–658 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Newman, M. A., Thomson, J. M. & Hammond, S. M. Lin-28 interaction with the Let-7 precursor loop mediates regulated microRNA processing. RNA 14, 1539–1549 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Viswanathan, S., Daley, G. & Gregory, R. Selective blockade of microRNA processing by Lin28. Science 320, 97–100 (2008). References 52 and 53 identify the stem cell factor and RNA-binding protein LIN28 as an inhibitor of let-7 maturation.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Heo, I. et al. Lin28 mediates the terminal uridylation of let-7 precursor MicroRNA. Mol. Cell 32, 276–284 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Rybak, A. et al. A feedback loop comprising lin-28 and let-7 controls pre-let-7 maturation during neural stem-cell commitment. Nature Cell Biol. 10, 987–993 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Krol, J., Loedige, I. & Filipowicz, W. The widespread regulation of microRNA biogenesis, function and decay. Nature Rev. Genet. 11, 597–610 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Nakagawa, M. et al. Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells without Myc from mouse and human fibroblasts. Nature Biotech. 26, 101–106 (2008).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. West, J. A. et al. A role for Lin28 in primordial germ-cell development and germ-cell malignancy. Nature 460, 909–913 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Guttman, M. et al. Chromatin signature reveals over a thousand highly conserved large non-coding RNAs in mammals. Nature 458, 223–227 (2009). In this first comprehensive study of lncRNAs, the authors use the chromatin signature of RNA polymerase II-transcribed regions (H3K4me3 and H3K36me3) to identify lincRNAs in four mouse cell types. Many of these lincRNAs are predicted to function in a wide range of biological processes.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Guttman, M. et al. Ab initio reconstruction of cell type-specific transcriptomes in mouse reveals the conserved multi-exonic structure of lincRNAs. Nature Biotech. 28, 503–510 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Sheik Mohamed, J., Gaughwin, P. M., Lim, B., Robson, P. & Lipovich, L. Conserved long noncoding RNAs transcriptionally regulated by Oct4 and Nanog modulate pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells. RNA 16, 324–337 (2009).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Dinger, M. E. et al. Long noncoding RNAs in mouse embryonic stem cell pluripotency and differentiation. Genome Res. 18, 1433–1445 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Loewer, S. et al. Large intergenic non-coding RNA-RoR modulates reprogramming of human induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature Genet. 42, 1113–1117 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Schier, A. F. Nodal morphogens. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 1, a003459 (2009).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Martello, G. et al. MicroRNA control of Nodal signalling. Nature 449, 183–188 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Rosa, A., Spagnoli, F. M. & Brivanlou, A. H. The miR-430/427/302 family controls mesendodermal fate specification via species-specific target selection. Dev. Cell 16, 517–527 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Flynt, A. S., Li, N., Thatcher, E. J., Solnica-Krezel, L. & Patton, J. G. Zebrafish miR-214 modulates Hedgehog signaling to specify muscle cell fate. Nature Genet. 39, 259–263 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Leucht, C. et al. MicroRNA-9 directs late organizer activity of the midbrain-hindbrain boundary. Nature Neurosci. 11, 641–648 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Li, Y., Wang, F., Lee, J.-A. & Gao, F.-B. MicroRNA-9a ensures the precise specification of sensory organ precursors in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 20, 2793–2805 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Lai, E. C., Tam, B. & Rubin, G. M. Pervasive regulation of Drosophila Notch target genes by GY-box-, Brd-box-, and K-box-class microRNAs. Genes Dev. 19, 1067–1080 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Lee, J. T. Lessons from X-chromosome inactivation: long ncRNA as guides and tethers to the epigenome. Genes Dev. 23, 1831–1842 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Koerner, M. V., Pauler, F. M., Huang, R. & Barlow, D. P. The function of non-coding RNAs in genomic imprinting. Development 136, 1771–1783 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Schmidt, J. V., Levorse, J. M. & Tilghman, S. M. Enhancer competition between H19 and Igf2 does not mediate their imprinting. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 9733–9738 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Mancini-Dinardo, D., Steele, S. J., Levorse, J. M., Ingram, R. S. & Tilghman, S. M. Elongation of the Kcnq1ot1 transcript is required for genomic imprinting of neighboring genes. Genes Dev. 20, 1268–1282 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Sleutels, F., Zwart, R. & Barlow, D. P. The non-coding Air RNA is required for silencing autosomal imprinted genes. Nature 415, 810–813 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Umlauf, D. et al. Imprinting along the Kcnq1 domain on mouse chromosome 7 involves repressive histone methylation and recruitment of Polycomb group complexes. Nature Genet. 36, 1296–1300 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Nagano, T. et al. The Air noncoding RNA epigenetically silences transcription by targeting G9a to chromatin. Science 322, 1717–1720 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Pandey, R. R. et al. Kcnq1ot1 antisense noncoding RNA mediates lineage-specific transcriptional silencing through chromatin-level regulation. Mol. Cell 32, 232–246 (2008). References 77 and 78 demonstrate essential roles for imprinted lncRNAs in recruiting chromatin modifiers to neighbouring genes, resulting in monoallelic silencing of entire gene clusters in cis.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Terranova, R. et al. Polycomb group proteins Ezh2 and Rnf2 direct genomic contraction and imprinted repression in early mouse embryos. Dev. Cell 15, 668–679 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Mohammad, F., Mondal, T., Guseva, N., Pandey, G. K. & Kanduri, C. Kcnq1ot1 noncoding RNA mediates transcriptional gene silencing by interacting with Dnmt1. Development 137, 2493–2499 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Haig, D. Genomic imprinting and kinship: how good is the evidence? Annu. Rev. Genet. 38, 553–585 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Penny, G. D., Kay, G. F., Sheardown, S. A., Rastan, S. & Brockdorff, N. Requirement for Xist in X chromosome inactivation. Nature 379, 131–137 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Ogawa, Y., Sun, B. K. & Lee, J. T. Intersection of the RNA interference and X-inactivation pathways. Science 320, 1336–1341 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Kanellopoulou, C. et al. X chromosome inactivation in the absence of Dicer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 1122–1127 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Sun, B. K., Deaton, A. M. & Lee, J. T. A transient heterochromatic state in Xist preempts X inactivation choice without RNA stabilization. Mol. Cell 21, 617–628 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Tian, D., Sun, S. & Lee, J. T. The long noncoding RNA, Jpx, is a molecular switch for X chromosome inactivation. Cell 143, 390–403 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Wutz, A., Rasmussen, T. P. & Jaenisch, R. Chromosomal silencing and localization are mediated by different domains of Xist RNA. Nature Genet. 30, 167–174 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Navarro, P., Page, D. R., Avner, P. & Rougeulle, C. Tsix-mediated epigenetic switch of a CTCF-flanked region of the Xist promoter determines the Xist transcription program. Genes Dev. 20, 2787–2792 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Zhao, J., Sun, B. K., Erwin, J. A., Song, J.-J. & Lee, J. T. Polycomb proteins targeted by a short repeat RNA to the mouse X chromosome. Science 322, 750–756 (2008). Analogous to the function of imprinted ncRNAs (see references 77 and 78), this study provides evidence that a conserved ncRNA originating from the Xic recruits repressive chromatin-modifying complexes of the Polycomb group family (PRC2) in cis . Recruitment of PRC2 is essential for the nucleation of silencing of one entire X chromosome in mammalian females.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Gelbart, M. E. & Kuroda, M. I. Drosophila dosage compensation: a complex voyage to the X chromosome. Development 136, 1399–1410 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Akhtar, A. & Becker, P. B. Activation of transcription through histone H4 acetylation by MOF, an acetyltransferase essential for dosage compensation in Drosophila. Mol. Cell 5, 367–375 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Meller, V. H. & Rattner, B. P. The roX genes encode redundant male-specific lethal transcripts required for targeting of the MSL complex. EMBO J. 21, 1084–1091 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Deng, X., Rattner, B. P., Souter, S. & Meller, V. H. The severity of roX1 mutations is predicted by MSL localization on the X chromosome. Mech. Dev. 122, 1094–1105 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Stuckenholz, C., Meller, V. H. & Kuroda, M. I. Functional redundancy within roX1, a noncoding RNA involved in dosage compensation in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 164, 1003–1014 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Gilfillan, G. D. et al. Chromosome-wide gene-specific targeting of the Drosophila dosage compensation complex. Genes Dev. 20, 858–870 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Alekseyenko, A. A. et al. A sequence motif within chromatin entry sites directs MSL establishment on the Drosophila X chromosome. Cell 134, 599–609 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Kind, J. & Akhtar, A. Cotranscriptional recruitment of the dosage compensation complex to X-linked target genes. Genes Dev. 21, 2030–2040 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Lewis, E. B. A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila. Nature 276, 565–570 (1978).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Lipshitz, H. D., Peattie, D. A. & Hogness, D. S. Novel transcripts from the Ultrabithorax domain of the bithorax complex. Genes Dev. 1, 307–322 (1987).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Bender, W. & Fitzgerald, D. Transcription activates repressed domains in the Drosophila bithorax complex. Development 129, 4923–4930 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Hogga, I. & Karch, F. Transcription through the iab-7 cis-regulatory domain of the bithorax complex interferes with maintenance of Polycomb-mediated silencing. Development 129, 4915–4922 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Petruk, S. et al. Transcription of bxd noncoding RNAs promoted by trithorax represses Ubx in cis by transcriptional interference. Cell 127, 1209–1221 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Sanchez-Elsner, T., Gou, D., Kremmer, E. & Sauer, F. Noncoding RNAs of trithorax response elements recruit Drosophila Ash1 to Ultrabithorax. Science 311, 1118–1123 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Orom, U. A. et al. Long noncoding RNAs with enhancer-like function in human cells. Cell 143, 46–58 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. Martianov, I., Ramadass, A., Serra Barros, A., Chow, N. & Akoulitchev, A. Repression of the human dihydrofolate reductase gene by a non-coding interfering transcript. Nature 445, 666–670 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Kanhere, A. et al. Short RNAs are transcribed from repressed polycomb target genes and interact with polycomb repressive complex-2. Mol. Cell 38, 675–688 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. Rinn, J. L. et al. Functional demarcation of active and silent chromatin domains in human HOX loci by noncoding RNAs. Cell 129, 1311–1323 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. Tsai, M.-C. et al. Long noncoding RNA as modular scaffold of histone modification complexes. Science 329, 689–693 (2010). References 107 and 108 identify the lncRNA HOTAIR as trans -acting repressor of gene expression of the HOXD cluster (reference 107) and of several other loci throughout the genome (reference 108). HOTAIR 's silencing activity arises from its interaction with at least two repressive chromatin-modifying complexes, PRC2 (references 107,108) and LSD1–CoREST–REST (reference 108).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Gupta, R. A. et al. Long non-coding RNA HOTAIR reprograms chromatin state to promote cancer metastasis. Nature 464, 1071–1076 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. Zappulla, D. C. & Cech, T. R. RNA as a flexible scaffold for proteins: yeast telomerase and beyond. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 71, 217–224 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Khalil, A. M. et al. Many human large intergenic noncoding RNAs associate with chromatin-modifying complexes and affect gene expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 11667–11672 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. Huarte, M. et al. A large intergenic noncoding RNA induced by p53 mediates global gene repression in the p53 response. Cell 142, 409–419 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  113. Bond, A. M. et al. Balanced gene regulation by an embryonic brain ncRNA is critical for adult hippocampal GABA circuitry. Nature Neurosci. 12, 1020–1027 (2009). One of the few in vivo studies on lncRNA function available to date; phenotypic analysis of Evf2 lncRNA knockout mice provides evidence that this lncRNA has essential roles for the development and function of GABAergic neurons.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Yekta, S., Shih, I.-H. & Bartel, D. P. MicroRNA-directed cleavage of HOXB8 mRNA. Science 304, 594–596 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Mansfield, J. H. et al. MicroRNA-responsive 'sensor' transgenes uncover Hox-like and other developmentally regulated patterns of vertebrate microRNA expression. Nature Genet. 36, 1079–1083 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Stark, A. et al. A single Hox locus in Drosophila produces functional microRNAs from opposite DNA strands. Genes Dev. 22, 8–13 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. Ronshaugen, M., Biemar, F., Piel, J., Levine, M. & Lai, E. C. The Drosophila microRNA iab-4 causes a dominant homeotic transformation of halteres to wings. Genes Dev. 19, 2947–2952 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  118. Tyler, D. M. et al. Functionally distinct regulatory RNAs generated by bidirectional transcription and processing of microRNA loci. Genes Dev. 22, 26–36 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. Bender, W. MicroRNAs in the Drosophila bithorax complex. Genes Dev. 22, 14–19 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. Thomsen, S., Azzam, G., Kaschula, R., Williams, L. S. & Alonso, C. R. Developmental RNA processing of 3′UTRs in Hox mRNAs as a context-dependent mechanism modulating visibility to microRNAs. Development 137, 2951–2960 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Amaral, P. P. & Mattick, J. S. Noncoding RNA in development. Mamm. Genome 19, 454–492 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Gao, F. B. Context-dependent functions of specific microRNAs in neuronal development. Neural Dev. 5, 25 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. Conaco, C., Otto, S., Han, J.-J. & Mandel, G. Reciprocal actions of REST and a microRNA promote neuronal identity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 2422–2427 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  124. Visvanathan, J., Lee, S., Lee, B., Lee, J. W. & Lee, S.-K. The microRNA miR-124 antagonizes the anti-neural REST/SCP1 pathway during embryonic CNS development. Genes Dev. 21, 744–749 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. Yoo, A. S., Staahl, B. T., Chen, L. & Crabtree, G. R. MicroRNA-mediated switching of chromatin-remodelling complexes in neural development. Nature 460, 642–646 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  126. Makeyev, E. V., Zhang, J., Carrasco, M. A. & Maniatis, T. The MicroRNA miR-124 promotes neuronal differentiation by triggering brain-specific alternative pre-mRNA splicing. Mol. Cell 27, 435–448 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  127. Boutz, P. L., Chawla, G., Stoilov, P. & Black, D. L. MicroRNAs regulate the expression of the alternative splicing factor nPTB during muscle development. Genes Dev. 21, 71–84 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. Chen, J. F. et al. The role of microRNA-1 and microRNA-133 in skeletal muscle proliferation and differentiation. Nature Genet. 38, 228–233 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Zhao, Y., Samal, E. & Srivastava, D. Serum response factor regulates a muscle-specific microRNA that targets Hand2 during cardiogenesis. Nature 436, 214–220 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Zhao, Y. et al. Dysregulation of cardiogenesis, cardiac conduction, and cell cycle in mice lacking miRNA-1-2. Cell 129, 303–317 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Zhao, C., Sun, G., Li, S. & Shi, Y. A feedback regulatory loop involving microRNA-9 and nuclear receptor TLX in neural stem cell fate determination. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 365–371 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  132. Clark, A. et al. The microRNA miR-124 controls gene expression in the sensory nervous system of Caenorhabditis elegans. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 3780–3793 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  133. Johnston, R. J. & Hobert, O. A microRNA controlling left/right neuronal asymmetry in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 426, 845–849 (2003). One of the first studies that implicated miRNAs in regulating cell fate decisions.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Johnston, R. J. & Hobert, O. A novel C. elegans zinc finger transcription factor, lsy-2, required for the cell type-specific expression of the lsy-6 microRNA. Development 132, 5451–5460 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Didiano, D., Cochella, L., Tursun, B. & Hobert, O. Neuron-type specific regulation of a 3′UTR through redundant and combinatorially acting cis-regulatory elements. RNA 16, 349–363 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  136. Ponjavic, J., Oliver, P. L., Lunter, G. & Ponting, C. P. Genomic and transcriptional co-localization of protein-coding and long non-coding RNA pairs in the developing brain. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000617 (2009).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  137. Mercer, T. R., Dinger, M. E., Sunkin, S. M., Mehler, M. F. & Mattick, J. S. Specific expression of long noncoding RNAs in the mouse brain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 716–721 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  138. Young, T. L., Matsuda, T. & Cepko, C. L. The noncoding RNA taurine upregulated gene 1 is required for differentiation of the murine retina. Curr. Biol. 15, 501–512 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. Feng, J. et al. The Evf-2 noncoding RNA is transcribed from the Dlx-5/6 ultraconserved region and functions as a Dlx-2 transcriptional coactivator. Genes Dev. 20, 1470–1484 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  140. Schratt, G. M. et al. A brain-specific microRNA regulates dendritic spine development. Nature 439, 283–289 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Korpal, M., Lee, E. S., Hu, G. & Kang, Y. The miR-200 family inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer cell migration by direct targeting of E-cadherin transcriptional repressors ZEB1 and ZEB2. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 14910–14914 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  142. Park, S.-M., Gaur, A. B., Lengyel, E. & Peter, M. E. The miR-200 family determines the epithelial phenotype of cancer cells by targeting the E-cadherin repressors ZEB1 and ZEB2. Genes Dev. 22, 894–907 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  143. Gregory, P. A. et al. The miR-200 family and miR-205 regulate epithelial to mesenchymal transition by targeting ZEB1 and SIP1. Nature Cell Biol. 10, 593–601 (2008). References 141–143 identify the miR-200 family as essential regulators of the gene regulatory network that guards the EMT. These studies also indicate that misregulation of pathways that are normally active during development can cause disease during later stages of development.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Rajasethupathy, P. et al. Characterization of small RNAs in Aplysia reveals a role for miR-124 in constraining synaptic plasticity through CREB. Neuron 63, 803–817 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  145. Thiery, J. P., Acloque, H., Huang, R. Y. J. & Nieto, M. A. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and disease. Cell 139, 871–890 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Cano, A. & Nieto, M. A. Non-coding RNAs take centre stage in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Trends Cell Biol. 18, 357–359 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Burk, U. et al. A reciprocal repression between ZEB1 and members of the miR-200 family promotes EMT and invasion in cancer cells. EMBO Rep. 9, 582–589 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  148. Wellner, U. et al. The EMT-activator ZEB1 promotes tumorigenicity by repressing stemness-inhibiting microRNAs. Nature Cell Biol. 11, 1487–1495 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. Beltran, M. et al. A natural antisense transcript regulates Zeb2/Sip1 gene expression during Snail1-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Genes Dev. 22, 756–769 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  150. Frankel, L. B. et al. Programmed cell death 4 (PDCD4) is an important functional target of the microRNA miR-21 in breast cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 1026–1033 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  151. Asangani, I. A. et al. MicroRNA-21 (miR-21) post-transcriptionally downregulates tumor suppressor Pdcd4 and stimulates invasion, intravasation and metastasis in colorectal cancer. Oncogene 27, 2128–2136 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. Davis, B. N., Hilyard, A. C., Lagna, G. & Hata, A. SMAD proteins control DROSHA-mediated microRNA maturation. Nature 454, 56–61 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  153. Davis, B. N., Hilyard, A. C., Nguyen, P. H., Lagna, G. & Hata, A. Smad proteins bind a conserved RNA sequence to promote microRNA maturation by Drosha. Mol. Cell 39, 373–384 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  154. Miska, E. A. et al. Most Caenorhabditis elegans microRNAs are individually not essential for development or viability. PLoS Genet. 3, e215 (2007).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  155. Abbott, A. L. et al. The let-7 MicroRNA family members mir-48, mir-84, and mir-241 function together to regulate developmental timing in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev. Cell 9, 403–414 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  156. Grimson, A. et al. Early origins and evolution of microRNAs and Piwi-interacting RNAs in animals. Nature 455, 1193–1197 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. Christodoulou, F. et al. Ancient animal microRNAs and the evolution of tissue identity. Nature 463, 1084–1088 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  158. Clop, A. et al. A mutation creating a potential illegitimate microRNA target site in the myostatin gene affects muscularity in sheep. Nature Genet. 38, 813–818 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  159. Hanyu-Nakamura, K., Sonobe-Nojima, H., Tanigawa, A., Lasko, P. & Nakamura, A. Drosophila Pgc protein inhibits P-TEFb recruitment to chromatin in primordial germ cells. Nature 451, 730–733 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  160. Kondo, T. et al. Small peptides switch the transcriptional activity of shavenbaby during Drosophila embryogenesis. Science 329, 336–339 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  161. Kondo, T. et al. Small peptide regulators of actin-based cell morphogenesis encoded by a polycistronic mRNA. Nature Cell Biol. 9, 660–665 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  162. Candeias, M. M. et al. P53 mRNA controls p53 activity by managing Mdm2 functions. Nature Cell Biol. 10, 1098–1105 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  163. Jenny, A. et al. A translation-independent role of oskar RNA in early Drosophila oogenesis. Development 133, 2827–2833 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  164. Waters, L. S. & Storz, G. Regulatory RNAs in bacteria. Cell 136, 615–628 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  165. Iliopoulos, D. et al. Loss of miR-200 inhibition of Suz12 leads to polycomb-mediated repression required for the formation and maintenance of cancer stem cells. Mol. Cell 39, 761–772 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  166. Shimono, Y. et al. Downregulation of miRNA-200c links breast cancer stem cells with normal stem cells. Cell 138, 592–603 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  167. Lee, J. T. The X as model for RNA's niche in epigenomic regulation. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2, a003749 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  168. Cheng, L.-C., Pastrana, E., Tavazoie, M. & Doetsch, F. miR-124 regulates adult neurogenesis in the subventricular zone stem cell niche. Nature Neurosci. 12, 399–408 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank G.-L. Chew and O. Minkina for critical reading of the manuscript, and E. Valen, E. Alvarez-Saavedra, S. Cohen, R. Gregory, O. Hobert and members of the Schier laboratory for discussions. This work was supported by US National Institutes of Health grants to A.F.S. and J.L.R. and by fellowships from the European Molecular Biology Organization (ALTF 372-2009) and The Human Frontier Science Program (LT-000307/2010) to A.P.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, 02138, Massachusetts, USA

    Andrea Pauli & Alexander F. Schier

  2. The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, 02142, Massachusetts, USA

    Andrea Pauli, John L. Rinn & Alexander F. Schier

  3. Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, 02138, Massachusetts, USA

    John L. Rinn & Alexander F. Schier

  4. Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, 02138, Massachusetts, USA

    Alexander F. Schier

Authors
  1. Andrea Pauli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John L. Rinn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alexander F. Schier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Andrea Pauli or Alexander F. Schier.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information S1 (table)

Complexity of non-coding RNAs in animals (PDF 272 kb)

Related links

Related links

FURTHER INFORMATION

John L. Rinn's homepage

Alexander F. Schier's homepage

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

S1 (table)

Glossary

miRNAs

(MicroRNAs). ssRNAs of ∼22 bp that act as guides for RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC)-mediated repression of partially complementary target genes. Biogenesis of most miRNAs requires the stepwise activity of two RNase III endonuclease complexes, nuclear Drosha–DGCR8 and cytoplasmic Dicer.

lncRNAs

(Long non-coding RNAs). Transcripts that resemble protein-coding mRNAs in that they are capped, spliced and polyadenylated RNA polymerase II transcripts; they differ from mRNAs only in their lack of a protein-coding ORF.

endo-siRNAs

(Endogenous small interfering RNAs). Small RNAs that originate, in a Dicer-dependent manner, from long double-stranded (sense–antisense or hairpin) precursors. Initially mainly thought of as a mechanism of host defence against exogenous dsRNA, endo-siRNAs are now known to also regulate endogenous mRNAs in mouse oocytes and Caenorhabditis elegans.

piRNAs

(PIWI-interacting RNAs). Small (24–31 bp) RNAs that are associated with PIWI-clade proteins of the Argonaute family. They ensure genome stability in the germ line of flies, mice and zebrafish by silencing transposable and repetitive elements.

lincRNAs

(Large intergenic non-coding RNAs). A subgroup of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) that originate from intergenic regions.

Drosha

The double-stranded RNA processing enzyme that catalyses the nuclear primary microRNA (pri-miRNA) to precursor miRNA (pre-miRNA) cleavage reaction.

DGCR8

The essential RNA-binding cofactor of Drosha; DGCR8 and Drosha are core proteins of the so-called microprocessor complex that promotes nuclear primary microRNA (pri-miRNA) to precursor miRNA (pre-miRNA) processing during canonical microRNA biogenesis.

Dicer

The dsRNA processing enzyme that catalyses the final cytoplasmic precursor microRNA (pre-miRNA) cleavage reaction to generate mature miRNAs during canonical miRNA biogenesis; Dicer also promotes processing of endogenous small interfering RNA (endo-siRNA) precursors to generate mature endo-siRNAs.

RNA-induced silencing complex

(RISC). The RISC complex contains the single-stranded, ∼22 bp miRNA and proteins of the Argonaute family. The miRNA acts as guide for the Argonaute proteins, which mediate the repression of the target mRNA.

Germ layers

Cell layers that are specified in a transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ)-signalling dependent manner after the initial embryonic cleavage stages. Each of the three primary germ layers (ectoderm, endoderm and mesoderm) gives rise to specific tissues and organs during later embryogenesis.

Deadenylation

The process of removal of the 3′ poly(A) tail of mRNAs, which leads to their destabilization and subsequent degradation; deadenylation is mainly mediated by the CAF1–CCR4 deadenylase complex and contributes to the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC)-mediated repression of target mRNAs.

Primordial germ cells

(PGCs). Embryonic cells that give rise to germ cells from which the haploid gametes (oocytes in females and sperm in males) differentiate.

Induced pluripotent stem cells

(iPS cells). In vitro-derived pluripotent stem cells that originate from non-pluripotent somatic cells in a process called reprogramming.

Dosage compensation

A process that equalizes levels of X-linked gene expression in XX females and XY males.

Epigenetic

An epigenetic change is an inherited phenotypic change that is caused by mechanisms other than changes in the underlying DNA sequence.

Polycomb

Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are epigenetic regulators of gene expression that silence target genes by establishing a repressive chromatin state. Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) trimethylates histone H3 at lysine 27 (H3K27me3). This repressive histone modification is recognized by PRC1, which has ubiquitylating activity. Because of their role in maintaining states of gene expression, PRCs have key roles in cell fate maintenance and transitions during development.

Hox genes

Hox genes represent an ancestral embryonic patterning mechanism that specifies segmental identities along the anterior–posterior body axis in all bilateria. Hox genes encode homeobox transcription factors that are arranged in clusters. Expression of paralogous Hox genes within a cluster is tightly regulated both spatially and temporally; misexpression causes dramatic alterations in the embryonic body plan (homeotic transformations).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pauli, A., Rinn, J. & Schier, A. Non-coding RNAs as regulators of embryogenesis. Nat Rev Genet 12, 136–149 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2904

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2904

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing