Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Epigenetic modifications during oocyte growth correlates with extended parthenogenetic development in the mouse

Abstract

In mammals, the maternal and paternal genomes are required for embryonic development1–5. This is due to genomic imprinting which leads to the expression or repression of genes solely on the basis of the parent from which they were inherited6–9 As a result, parthenogenetic embryos die before day 10 of gestation and show limited development of extra-embryonic membranes3,4. Maternal imprinting is established during oogenesis6–11 and is associated with allele specific modifications in DMA methylation. We have investigated epigenetic modifications during oocyte growth using nuclear transfer techniques to produce mature oocytes with maternal chro-matin derived from non-growing oocytes. Parthenogenetic activation of such oocytes leads to the development of normal size fetuses with a well developed placenta on day 13.5 of gestation; three days further than previously recorded for parthenogenetic development. In contrast, after fertilization, only one embryo was recovered on 9.5 days of gestation. Further, in these embryos we investigated the well characterized methylation pattern of the maternally expressed insulin-like growth factor II receptor gene (lgf2r) and found that the pattern of methylation was indeed different to that of fertilized control embryos. Thus, the embryonic phenotypes observed here correlate with changes in epigenetic events that normally occur during oocyte growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Surani, M.A.H. & Barton, S.C. Development of gynogenetic eggs in the mouse: implications for parthenogenetic embryos. Science 222, 1034–1036 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. McGrath, J. & Solter, D. Completion of mouse embryogenesis requires both the maternal and paternal genomes. Cell 37, 179–183 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Surani, M.A.H., Barton, S.C. & Norris, M.L. Development of reconstituted mouse eggs suggests imprinting of the genome during gametogenesis. Nature 308, 548–550 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Surani, M.A.H., Barton, S.C. & Norris, M.L. Nuclear transplantation in the mouse : heritable differences between parental genomes after activation of the embryonic genome. Cell 45, 127–136 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Surani, M.A.H., Barton, S.C. & Norris, M.L. Influence of parental chromosomes on spatial specificity in androgenetic – parthenogenetic chimaeras in the mouse. Nature 326, 395–397 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Monk, M. Genome imprinting. Genes Dev. 2, 921–925 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brandeis, M. et al.The ontogeny of allele-specific methylation associated with imprinted genes in the mouse. EMBO J. 12, 3669–3677 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Surani, M.A. et al.Genome imprinting and development in the mouse. Development suppl., 89–98 (1990).

  9. Latham, K.E. & Solter, D. The effect of egg composition on the developmental capacity of androgenetic mouse embryos. Development 113, 561–568 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chaillet, J.R., Vogt, T.F., Beier, D.R. & Leder, P. Parental specific methylation of an imprinted transgene established during gametogenesis and progressively changes during embryogenesis. Cell 66, 77–84 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stoger, R. et al. Maternal-specific methylation of the imprinted mouse locus identifies the expressed locus as carrying the imprinted signal. Cell 73, 61–71 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Balkier, H. & Tarkowski, K. The role of germinal vesicle karyoplasm in the development of male pronucleus in the mouse. Exp. Cell Res. 128, 79–85 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Theiler, K. in The House Mouse: Atlas of Embryonic Development (Springer Verlag, 1989).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Driscoll, D.J. & Migion, B.R. Sex differences in methylation of single copy genes in human meiotic germ cells: implications for X chromosome inactivation, parental imprinting and origin of CPG mutations. Som. Cell Mol. Genet 16, 267–282 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kafri, T., et al. Developmental pattern of gene specific DNA methylation in the mouse embryo and germ line. Genes Dev. 6, 705–714 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ueda, T. et al. Parental methylation patterns of a transgenic locus in adult somatic tissues are imprinted during gametogenesis. Development 116, 834–839 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Neumann, B., Kubicka, P. & Barlow, D.P. Characteristics of imprinted genes. Nature Genet 9, 12–13 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Szabo, P.E. & Mann, J.R. Biallelic expression of imprinted genes in the mouse germ line: Implications for erasure, establishment and mechanisms of genomic imprinting. Genes Dev. 9, 1857–1868 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Li, E., Beard, C. & Jaenisch, R. Role for DNA methylation in genomic imprinting. Nature 366, 362–365 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Szabo, R.E. & Mann, J.R. Allele-specific expression and total expression levels of imprinted genes during early mouse development: implications for imprinting mechanisms. Genes Dev. (in the press).

  21. Lau, M.M.H. et al. Loss of the imprinted IGF2/cation-independent mannose 6-phosphate receptor results in fetal overgrowth and perinatal lethality. Genes Dev. 8, 2953–2965 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Guillemot, F. et al. Genomic imprinting of Mash2, a mouse gene required for trophoblast development. Nature Genet. 9, 235–242.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Barton, S.C., Adams, C.A., Norris, M.L. & Surani, M.A.H. Development of gynogenetic and parthenogenetic inner cell mass and trophectoderm tissues in reconstituted blastocysts in the mouse. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 90, 267–285 (1985).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Eppig, J.J. & Telfer, E.E. Isolation and culture of oocytes. in Methods in Enzymology. 77–83 (Academic Press, New York, 1993).

  25. Kono, T., Sotomaru, Y., Sato, Y. & Nakahara, T. Development of androgenetic mouse embryos produced by in vitro fertilization of enucleated oocytes. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 34, 43–46 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. McGrath, J. & Solter, D. Nuclear transplantation in the mouse by microsurgery and cell fusion. Science 220, 1330–1302 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bos-Mikich, A. et al. Calcium oscillations and protein synthesis inhibition synergistically activate mouse oocytes. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 41, 84–90 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Whittingham, D.G. Culture of mouse ova. J. Reprod. Fert. 14, 7–14 (1971).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kono, T., Obata, Y., Yoshimzu, T. et al. Epigenetic modifications during oocyte growth correlates with extended parthenogenetic development in the mouse. Nat Genet 13, 91–94 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng0596-91

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng0596-91

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing