Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Commentary
  • Published:

Selection, the mutation rate and cancer: Ensuring that the tail does not wag the dog

Abstract

In considering tumorigenesis, much attention is paid to genome instability and mutation rates. While reflecting on the circumstances that have led to this emphasis on mutation rates, Ian Tomlinson and Walter Bodmer point out that an increased mutation rate does not necessarily cause a tumor to grow and that selection is in fact the mechanism that drives the cellular, somatic evolution that leads to cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Brugarolas, J. & Jacks, T. Double indemnity: p53, BRCA and cancer. Nature Med. 3, 721–722 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cairns, J. Mutation and cancer: the antecedents to our studies of adaptive mutation. Genetics 148, 1433–1440 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kinzler, K.W. & Vogelstein, B.V. Lessons from hereditary colorectal cancer. Cell 87, 159–170 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rotman, G. & Shiloh, Y. ATM: from gene to function. Hum. Mol. Genet. 7, 1555–1563 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Loeb, L.A., C.F. Springgate & Battula, N. Errors in DNA replication as a basis of malignant changes. Cancer Res. 34, 2311–2321 (1974).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Loeb, L.A. . Transient expression of a mutator phenotype in cancer cells. Science 277, 1449–1450 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cairns, J. Mutation selection and the natural history of cancer. Nature 255, 197–200 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tomlinson, I.P.M., M.R. Novelli & Bodmer, W.F. The mutation rate and cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 14800–14803 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Homfray, T.F.R. et al. Defects in mismatch repair occur after APC mutations in the pathogenesis of sporadic colorectal tumors. Hum. Mutat. 11, 114–120 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang, J. et al. APC mutations in colorectal tumors with mismatch repair deficiency. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 9049–9054 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nowell, P.C. The clonal evolution of tumor cell populations. Science 194, 23–28 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Orr–Weaver, T.L. & Weinberg, R.A. A checkpoint on the road to cancer. Nature 392, 223–224 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Loeb, L.A. Mutator phenotype may be required for multistage carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 51, 3075–3079 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tomlinson, I.P.M. & Bodmer, W.F. . Failure of programmed cell death and differentiation as causes of tumors: some simple mathematical models. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 11130–11134 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Richards, B. et al. Conditional mutator phenotypes in hMSH2–deficient tumor cell lines. Science 277, 1523–1525 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Branch, P. et al. Immune surveillance in colorectal carcinoma. Nature Genet. 9, 231–232 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Young, J. et al. Genomic instability occurs in colorectal carcinomas but not in adenomas. Hum. Mutat. 2, 351–354 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Davis, T.W. et al. Defective expression of the DNA mismatch repair protein, MLH1, alters G2–M cell cycle checkpoint arrest following ionizing radiation. Cancer Res. 58, 767–768 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kinzler, K.W. & Vogelstein, B. Cancer–susceptibility genes. Gatekeepers and caretakers. Nature 386, 761–763 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tomlinson, I., Bodmer, W. Selection, the mutation rate and cancer: Ensuring that the tail does not wag the dog. Nat Med 5, 11–12 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/4687

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/4687

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing