Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Imprinted expression of the Igf2r gene depends on an intronic CpG island

Abstract

Gametic imprinting is a developmental process that induces parental-specific expression or repression of autosomal and X-chromosome-linked genes1,2. The mouse Igf2r gene (encoding the receptor for insulin- like growth factor type-2) is imprinted and is expressed from the maternal allele after embryonic implantation3. We previously proposed that methylation of region 2, a region rich in cytosine-guanine doublets (a ‘CpG island’) in the second intron of Igf2r, is the imprinting signal that maintains expression of the maternal allele4. Here we use mouse transgenes to test the role of region 2 and the influence of chromosome location on Igf2r imprinting. Yeast artificial chromosome transgenes successfully reproduced the imprinted methylation and expression pattern of the endogenous Igf2r gene; deletion of region 2 from these transgenes caused a loss of imprinting and restored biallelic Igf2r expression. These results define a primary role for region 2 and a negligible role for chromosomal location in Igf2r imprinting; they also show that methylation imprints can maintain allelic expression. Short transgenes containing only region 2 and yeast artificial chromosome transgenes with an inactive Igf2r promoter do not attract parental-specific methylation. All transgenes showing paternal-specific repression of Igf2r produced an antisense RNA whose transcription was dependent on region 2. The production of an antisense RNA by the repressed parental allele is reminiscent of the imprinting of the Igf2/H19 gene pair5 and may indicate that expression competition could play a general role in imprinting.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Cloning of YACs in S. cerevisiae.
Figure 2: a, YAC DNA for microinjection (20?µl) separated by PFGE was hybridized with Plg cDNA; the 300-kb signal indicates intact YAC molecules (ST; slot).
Figure 3: Parental-specific expression and methylation of YAC-T1/P transgenes.
Figure 4: a and b, expression of the region-2-deleted YAC-T1/PΔR2 transgenes.
Figure 5: Methylation of region 2 on short transgenes.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. John, R. M. & Surani, M. A. Imprinted genes and regulation of gene expression by epigenetic inheritance. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 8, 348–353 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Leighton, P. A., Saam, J. R., Ingram, R. S. & Tilghman, S. M. Genomic imprinting in mice—its function and mechanism. Biol. Reprod. 54, 273–278 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lerchner, W. L. & Barlow, D. P. Paternal repression of the imprinted mouse Igf2r locus occurs during implantation and is stable in all tissues of the post-implantation mouse embryo. Mech. Dev. 61, 1–9 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stöger, R. et al. Maternal-specific methylation of the imprinted mouse Igf2r locus identifies the expressed locus as carrying the imprinting signal. Cell 73, 61–71 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bartolomei, M. S., Webber, A. L., Brunkow, M. E. & Tilghman, S. M. Epigenetic mechanisms underlying the imprinting of the mouse H19 gene. Genes Dev. 7, 1663–1673 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pfeifer, K., Leighton, P. A. & Tilghman, S. M. The structural H19 gene is required for transgene imprinting. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 13876–13883 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Elson, D. A. & Bartolomei, M. S. A5′ differentially methylated sequence and the 3′ flanking region are necessary for H19 transgene imprinting. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 309–317 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Leighton, P. A., Ingram, R. S., Eggenschwiler, J., Efstratiadis, A. & Tilghman, S. M. Disruption of imprinting caused by deletion of the H19 gene region in mice. Nature 375, 34–39 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Saitoh, S. et al. Minimal definition of the imprinting center and fixation of a chromosome 15q11-q13 epigenotype by imprinting mutations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 7811–7815 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dittrich, B. et al. Imprint switching on chromosome 15 may involve alternate transcripts of the SNRPN gene. Nature Genet. 14, 163–170 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Paldi, A., Guapay, G. & Jami, J. Imprinted chromosomal regions of the human genome display sex-specific meiotic recombination frequencies. Curr. Biol. 5, 1030–1035 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bickmore, W. A. & Carothers, A. D. Factors affecting the timing and imprinting of replication on a mammalian chromosome. J. Cell Sci. 108, 2801–2909 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bird, A. P. Imprints on islands. Curr. Biol. 3, 275–277 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Neumann, B., Kubicka, P. & Barlow, D. P. Characteristics of imprinted genes. Nature Genet. 9, 12–13 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bestor, T. H. & Tycko, B. Creation of genomic methylation patterns. Nature Genet. 12, 363–367 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Li, E., Beard, C. & Jaenisch, R. Role for DNA methylation in genomic imprinting. Nature 366, 362–365 (1993).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tucker, K. L. et al. Germ-line passage is required for establishment of methylation and expression patterns of imprinted but not of non-imprinted genes. Genes Dev. 10, 1008–1020 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Larin, Z., Monaco, A. P. & Lehrach, H. Yeast artificial chromosome libraries containing large inserts from mouse and human DNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 88, 4123–4127 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Brandeis, M. et al. The ontogeny of allele-specific methylation associated with imprinted genes in the mouse. EMBO J. 12, 3669–3677 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Macleod, D., Charlton, J., Mullins, J. & Bird, A. P. SpI sites in the mouse Aprt gene promoter are required to prevent methylation of the CpG island. Genes Dev. 8, 2282–2292 YEAR?.

  21. Brandeis, M. et al. SpI elements protect a CpG island from de novo methylation. Nature 371, 435–438 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kitsberg, D. et al. Allele-specific replication timing of imprinted gene regions. Nature 364, 459–463 (1993).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lewis, B. C., Shah, N. P., Braun, B. S. & Denny, C. T. Creation of a yeast artificial chromosome fragmentation vector based on lysine-2. Genet. Analyt. Tech. Appl. 9, 86–90 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Villar, A. J. & Pederson, R. A. Parental imprinting of the Mas protooncogene in mouse. Nature Genet. 8, 373–379 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Schweifer, N. et al. Characterisation of the C3 YAC contig from proximal mouse chromosome 17 and analysis of allelic expression of genes flanking the imprinted Igf2r gene. Genomics 43, 285–297 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hogan, B., Beddington, R., Costantini, F. & Lacy, E. Manipulating the Mouse Embryo (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. & Maniatis, T. in Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual 2nd edn 743–752 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. King for maintaining the mouse colony; R. Kurzbauer and G. Schaffner for DNA sequencing and oligonucleotide synthesis; F. Sleutels for mapping the line-c transgene; and M.Sibilia, G. Christofori and A. Berns for critical comments. A.W. particularly thanks A. Schedl for help with the YAC protocol and T. Jenuwein for introduction to and help with transgenic technology. Part of this work was supported by the Austrian Industrial Promotion Fund and a Schrödinger Fellowship to O.W.S.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Author notes

  1. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to D.P.B.

    Authors

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Denise P. Barlow.

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Cite this article

    Wutz, A., Smrzka, O., Schweifer, N. et al. Imprinted expression of the Igf2r gene depends on an intronic CpG island. Nature 389, 745–749 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/39631

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Issue Date:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/39631

    This article is cited by

    Comments

    By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

    Search

    Quick links

    Nature Briefing

    Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

    Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing