Elsevier

The Lancet Neurology

Volume 14, Issue 10, October 2015, Pages 1002-1009
The Lancet Neurology

Articles
Diagnosis of Parkinson's disease on the basis of clinical and genetic classification: a population-based modelling study

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00178-7Get rights and content

Summary

Background

Accurate diagnosis and early detection of complex diseases, such as Parkinson's disease, has the potential to be of great benefit for researchers and clinical practice. We aimed to create a non-invasive, accurate classification model for the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease, which could serve as a basis for future disease prediction studies in longitudinal cohorts.

Methods

We developed a model for disease classification using data from the Parkinson's Progression Marker Initiative (PPMI) study for 367 patients with Parkinson's disease and phenotypically typical imaging data and 165 controls without neurological disease. Olfactory function, genetic risk, family history of Parkinson's disease, age, and gender were algorithmically selected by stepwise logistic regression as significant contributors to our classifying model. We then tested the model with data from 825 patients with Parkinson's disease and 261 controls from five independent cohorts with varying recruitment strategies and designs: the Parkinson's Disease Biomarkers Program (PDBP), the Parkinson's Associated Risk Study (PARS), 23andMe, the Longitudinal and Biomarker Study in PD (LABS-PD), and the Morris K Udall Parkinson's Disease Research Center of Excellence cohort (Penn-Udall). Additionally, we used our model to investigate patients who had imaging scans without evidence of dopaminergic deficit (SWEDD).

Findings

In the population from PPMI, our initial model correctly distinguished patients with Parkinson's disease from controls at an area under the curve (AUC) of 0·923 (95% CI 0·900–0·946) with high sensitivity (0·834, 95% CI 0·711–0·883) and specificity (0·903, 95% CI 0·824–0·946) at its optimum AUC threshold (0·655). All Hosmer-Lemeshow simulations suggested that when parsed into random subgroups, the subgroup data matched that of the overall cohort. External validation showed good classification of Parkinson's disease, with AUCs of 0·894 (95% CI 0·867–0·921) in the PDBP cohort, 0·998 (0·992–1·000) in PARS, 0·955 (no 95% CI available) in 23andMe, 0·929 (0·896–0·962) in LABS-PD, and 0·939 (0·891–0·986) in the Penn-Udall cohort. Four of 17 SWEDD participants who our model classified as having Parkinson's disease converted to Parkinson's disease within 1 year, whereas only one of 38 SWEDD participants who were not classified as having Parkinson's disease underwent conversion (test of proportions, p=0·003).

Interpretation

Our model provides a potential new approach to distinguish participants with Parkinson's disease from controls. If the model can also identify individuals with prodromal or preclinical Parkinson's disease in prospective cohorts, it could facilitate identification of biomarkers and interventions.

Funding

National Institute on Aging, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, and the Michael J Fox Foundation.

Introduction

Accurate diagnosis or prediction of risk by use of simple, non-invasive measures is a rarely realised goal for many complex diseases. For complex progressive diseases such as Parkinson's disease, preclinical diagnosis and low error rates in diagnosis are crucial in clinical trials and the study of disease-altering therapeutic approaches.

Imaging is often deemed the gold standard for identification of typical Parkinson's disease pre-mortem, however, high cost and restricted portability limit the use of this approach. We aimed to develop a portable method to identify patients with Parkinson's disease who show aetiologically typical disease presentation (confirmed by dopamine transporter [DAT] imaging data). We used a combination of factors that vary over the life of an individual, factors that are constant and do not change with time, general indicators of neurodegeneration, and Parkinson's disease-specific measures to create our classification algorithm.

Section snippets

Study design and participants

Figure 1 shows a summary of our workflow. Table 1 describes the cohorts we used and further details are available in the appendix: the Parkinson's Progression Marker Initiative (PPMI), the Parkinson's Disease Biomarkers Program (PDBP), the Parkinson's Associated Risk Study (PARS), 23andMe, the Longitudinal and Biomarker Study in PD (LABS-PD), and the Morris K Udall Parkinson's Disease Research Center of Excellence cohort (Penn-Udall). PPMI and PDBP are case-control studies that use a shared set

Results

To accompany this report, and to help with replication and extension of our work, the code and training data for this predictive model and some validation data have been made publicly available online.

Each of five factors that we included made significant contributions to the information content of the integrative predictive model. In comparisons of the standardised beta coefficients within the regression model, the UPSIT score was responsible for 63·1% of the explained variance, followed by

Discussion

We have designed an accurate, non-invasive method to discriminate patients with Parkinson's disease from controls. The studies that we assessed vary in their design, recruitment, and implementation; however, our results and validation suggest that the model might be useful in future. The model we developed includes hyposmia, which is often considered an indicator of neurodegeneration, in addition to genetic, clinical, and demographic data.1 This approach makes use of the growing wealth of data

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (163)

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text