Amelogenesis imperfecta phenotype–genotype correlations with two amelogenin gene mutations
Introduction
Amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) is a clinically and genetically diverse group of conditions affecting the development of dental enamel (Witkop, 1989). Depending on the imperfecta type, the enamel defects may be abnormalities of amount, structure and/or composition. The molecular basis of these conditions has so far only been elucidated for X-linked forms of AI, in which a variety of mutations in the X-chromosome amelogenin gene (AMELX) that lead to diverse phenotypes have been found (see Hart et al. (2000) for recent review). No cases of mutations in the Y-chromosome amelogenin gene have been identified. The more common, autosomal-dominant types of AI are also clinically and genetically heterogeneous. Amelogenin gene mutations identified to date include large deletions, single-base deletions, and mis-sense and non-sense mutations.
Amelogenin, the predominant extracellular matrix protein in developing enamel, is thought to form a scaffold for enamel crystallites and to participate in controlling their growth (Robinson et al., 1990, Fincham et al., 1992, Simmer and Fincham, 1995), but its exact functions are not fully known. It is processed in a highly controlled fashion that is apparently important for normal enamel formation (Robinson et al., 1990, Brookes et al., 1995). The study of enamel formation under the influence of genetically altered amelogenin should therefore provide unique insights into the function of the protein. The amelogenin mutations reported to date result in diverse phenotypes, ranging from a deficiency in the amount of enamel (hypoplasia) to defects in enamel mineralization (hypomineralization) (Hart et al., 2000).
Although there is demonstrable diversity in the expression of AI even within individuals from the same kindred, there is growing evidence that unique phenotypes could be associated with specific AMELX mutations (Aldred et al., 1992, Ravassipour et al., 2000). For example, three families with the same single-base C→A substitution in codon 40 of exon 6 causing a Pro→Thr change show strong conservation of phenotype in affected individuals (Ravassipour et al., 2000). All the affected males with this mutation who have been analyzed had what was considered to be the hypomaturational form of AI, with retention of amelogenin and hypomineralization but no evidence of hypoplastic defects. In contrast, other AMELX mutations are often associated with severely hypoplastic phenotypes (Lench and Winter, 1995).
We hypothesize that those mutations which cause changes in domains of the amelogenin protein that have different and unique functions will result in distinct and diverse phenotypes. Identifying different AMELX mutations and correlating them with the resulting phenotype should help to define the functions of the amelogenin protein and its functional domains. Therefore, our purpose now was to characterize the phenotype and genotype in two large families segregating for X-linked AI.
Section snippets
Patients
The ethical use of human participants was approved by institutional review and informed consent was obtained from all participants. Two families were identified as having AI, detailed family histories were taken. Family members were examined clinically and in some cases radiographically. The clinical phenotype and family history suggested an X-linked inheritance pattern (Fig. 1). Blood was obtained by venepuncture for genotyping and sequence analysis.
DNA sequencing
Exons 1–7 of AMELX were amplified as
Phenotype analysis
Most of the affected males in family 1 had been rendered edentulous or had had extensive restorations, with full crowns on most teeth. Any uncrowned teeth were yellow-brown, with loss of the normal translucency of enamel (Fig. 2a), which had also been subject to excessive wear. Heterozygous females in family 1 had vertical ridges and grooves on the enamel surface, with discoloration. Generally, their teeth appeared yellow-brown, but closer examination showed that the enamel in the grooves
Mutational analysis
DNA from heterozygous females in family 1 had a single nucleotide change at base 256 (nucleotide numbering based on cDNA after Salido et al., 1992). This A→T change in codon 47 (codons and amino acids begin at 1 with methionine of secreted 175-residue human X amelogenin (Salido et al., 1992)) results in a His→Leu change in the 47th amino acid of amelogenin. The wild-type amelogenin protein, the location of the His47Leu site in the protein and its proximity to the MMP20 cleavage are shown in
Discussion
Evaluation of these two kindreds with markedly different phenotypes of X-linked AI revealed a novel and a previously reported AMELX mutation. The His47Leu substitution occurs at a highly conserved histidine residue; it is only two amino acids C-terminal to a putative proteolytic cleavage site considered important in post-secretory matrix processing and enamel maturation (Collier et al., 1997, Li et al., 2001). The His→Leu substitution also occurs two amino acids C-terminal to an amelogenin
Acknowledgements
Supported by NIDCR Grant 12879 and the NH & MRC, AUS.
References (18)
- et al.
Genetic heterogeneity in X-linked amelogenesis imperfecta
Genomics
(1992) - et al.
Biochemistry and molecular biology of amelogenin proteins of developing dental enamel
Arch. Oral Biol.
(1995) - et al.
An amelogenin gene defect associated with human X-linked amelogenesis imperfecta
Arch. Oral Biol.
(1997) - et al.
Mutational analysis of X-linked amelogenesis imperfecta in multiple families
Arch. Oral Biol.
(2000) - et al.
Tyrosyl motif in amelogenins binds N-acetyl-d-glucosamine
J. Biol. Chem.
(1999) - et al.
The enamel protein amelogenin binds to the N-acetyl-d-flucosamine-mimicking peptide motif of cytokeratins
J. Biol. Chem.
(2000) - et al.
Specific amelogenin gene splice products have signaling effects on cells in culture and in implants in vivo
J. Biol. Chem.
(2000) - et al.
Function of amelogenins in porcine enamel mineralization during the secretory stage of amelogenesis
Adv. Dental Res.
(1987) - Fincham, A.G., Lau, E.C., Simmer, J., Zeichner-David, M., 1992. Amelogenin biochemistry—form and function. In: Slavkin,...
Cited by (79)
Loss of biological control of enamel mineralization in amelogenin-phosphorylation-deficient mice
2022, Journal of Structural BiologyAmelogenin phosphorylation regulates tooth enamel formation by stabilizing a transient amorphous mineral precursor
2020, Journal of Biological ChemistryCitation Excerpt :Although the organic matrix of forming enamel is transient, which is uncommon in biomineralization (48), setting amelogenesis apart from other biomineralization processes, the interplay between the extracellular enamel matrix and ameloblast function is evident during the protein-rich secretory stage of amelogenesis, when the enamel rod structure is established in WT enamel, but fails to form within the KI enamel matrix that lacks phosphorylated AMELXs. As has been shown in X-linked enamel disorders caused by other AMELX mutations (10, 49), HET enamel exhibits a wide range of highly variable defective structures, due to X-chromosome inactivation (lyonization) (50, 51) and the random distribution of ameloblasts that secrete either phosphorylated or nonphosphorylated AMELXs, again reflecting the impact of the interplay between the nature of the extracellular matrix and ameloblast function in controlling enamel structural organization. Our initial in vitro findings (26, 30) lead us to the present study using KI mice to test the hypothesis that Ser-16 AMELX phosphorylation plays an essential role in amelogenesis.
Tooth enamel protein amelogenin binds to ameloblast cell membrane-mimicking vesicles via its N-terminus
2015, Biochemical and Biophysical Research CommunicationsCandidate-gene exclusion in a family with inherited non-syndromic dental disorders
2012, GeneCitation Excerpt :DD-I is very rare, with an incidence rate of only 1/100,000, and the pathogenetic mechanisms of this condition remain unclear (O Carroll et al., 1991). Practical application of the Witkop and Shields systems is hampered by identical limits: great variability of clinical manifestations exists in the same subtype, even within the same family; the lack of close correlation between subtype classification and the molecular defect, clinical manifestations, radiographic findings, and severity, as three main criteria of classification, does not reflect the genetic molecular basis of the disease aetiology; diagnostic criteria of different subtypes overlap and, to a large extent, clinical diagnosis is influenced by the subjective opinions of practitioners (Bäckman, 1988; Hart et al., 2002). These factors have rendered clinical diagnosis of dental genetic disorders and molecular aetiological researches more difficult and complicated.
Molecular-based phenotype variations in amelogenesis imperfecta
2023, Oral DiseasesAmelogenesis imperfecta: Next-generation sequencing sheds light on Witkop’s classification
2023, Frontiers in Physiology