PIL indication/topic | Recommendations for clinical practice It should be best practice for PIL: | Suggestions from meeting discussion |
Diagnostic genetic testing | To be offered to people with cancer or a pre-malignant condition being offered genetic/genomic testing | Need less detail pre-results |
Pathogenic gene variant | To be offered to people who have a pathogenic variant in a cancer susceptibility gene | Mostly generic PIL+personalised letter |
Predictive genetic testing | To be offered to people being offered predictive testing (in addition to a copy of their clinic letter) | At-risk relatives should be referred for genetic counselling |
PIL format | To contain subheadings to make finding information easier | Should stand out Eg, bold |
Subheadings to be presented in the form of questions | ||
To include pictures to help explain key concepts | ||
PIL content | To mention psychological aspects/feelings related to having genetic testing | |
To include links to relevant charities | Check trusted | |
To include links to relevant patient peer support groups | ||
To include information about family planning/reproductive options, where relevant | Check phrasing with patients | |
About genetic testing to present all the choices, including to do nothing/not have genetic testing | ||
About genetic testing to mention rules about genetic testing and insurance | See ABI Code | |
About genetic testing to mention what might happen after results | ||
For people with a pathogenic gene variant to mention that more personalised information can be provided during an appointment with genetics or other specialists | Precise estimates might not be available | |
To be checked using a readability tool such as SMOG with the aim of achieving a reading level of 9–11 years. Medical terms may be temporarily removed, then added back into the PIL, making sure they are clearly explained | Aim for national reading age | |
To include simple explanations for any medical jargon or complex language | ||
To include the term pathogenic gene variant to match the term on genetic test reports | Other descriptions can be included | |
To be translated into the patient’s first language, if resources are available | ||
To be reviewed by patients with lived experience of the condition | Cost for this | |
To consider language and aim to be as inclusive as possible for all patients, including those with protected characteristics | Co-design with these patients | |
To have a date issued and date due for review | Secure funding | |
Risk communication | To include information about the chances of getting cancer/pre-malignant conditions, where relevant | |
To present chances for people to get cancer/premalignant conditions with numbers as well as words (eg, showing % or a x/10 or x/100 people, not just saying ‘high’ or ‘low’ chance) | ||
To include visual presentation of the chances of getting cancer/premalignant conditions, for example, icon arrays (repeated shapes showing people affected in a different colour), graphs, bar charts | Icon arrays preferred | |
To include contact details for relevant healthcare professionals/services (eg, genetics, oncology, haematology) | ||
Communicating uncertainty | To explain uncertainty, including where it comes from (such as lack of scientific knowledge, not enough families to study) and how this might make people feel | Area for further research |
See online supplemental table for more details about discussion and recommendations from meeting participants.