Table 1

Genetic stratification of 161 unrelated PCD families, according to TEM findings

TEM ultrastructural phenotype
Total number of families (% of 134 with TEM defects defined)
Mutant known PCD gene or novel candidateFamilies (n)
Normal TEM and inconclusive TEM analysis
(no apparent defect, or few observed defects insufficient to make a diagnosis)
37 families (28%)
DNAH11*15
HYDIN* 6
DNAH5 3
CCDC103* 2
RSPH1 1
OFD1 1
DNAI2 1
ZMYND10 1
Novel candidate gene4
Unsolved3
Outer dynein arm loss
31 families (23%)
DNAH5 17
DNAI1 3
ARMC4 2
DNAI2 1
CCDC151 1
SPAG1 1
PIH1D3 1
Unsolved5
Combined inner and outer dynein arm loss
30 families (22%)
LRRC6 5
DNAAF3 5
CCDC103 3
DNAH5 3
ZMYND10 2
DYX1C1 1
DNAAF1 1
HEATR2 1
DNAI1 1
Novel candidate gene4†
Unsolved4
Microtubular disorganisation ± inner dynein arm loss
16 families (12%)
CCDC40 7
CCDC39 5
CCDC65 1
RSPH9 1
RSPH1 1
Unsolved1
Central microtubular pair defect
8 families (6%)
RSPH4A 4
RSPH1 2
RSPH9 1
Unsolved1
Inner dynein arm loss
5 families (4%)
CCDC103 2
CCDC164 1
CCDC40 1
Novel candidate gene1‡
Lack of cilia cross sections
7 families (5%)
CCNO 2
MCIDAS 2
DYX1C1 1
RPGR 1
Novel candidate gene1
No TEM analysis
27 families
CCDC40 5
DNAH5 4
CCDC39 3
LRRC6 2
CCDC114 1
RSPH9 1
DNAH11 1
ZMYND10 1
Novel candidate gene2
Unsolved7
  • *DNAH11, HYDIN and often CCDC103 mutations are associated with normal TEM, while the other genes in this group are associated with visible TEM defects.25–27 Mutations in genes regarded during the study as candidates but since published as PCD genes were found in †2 families with CFAP300 and 1 family with DNAH9 variants, and in ‡1 family with DNAH9 variants.16 17

  • PCD, primary ciliary dyskinesia; TEM, transmission electron microscopy.