Table 2

Clinical features of patients with a CHD7 mutation compared to clinically diagnosed patients with CHARGE syndrome

FeatureOur CHD7 positive cohort (n=280)CHD7 positive cohort from the literature (n=254)*CHARGE patients before CHD7 discovery (n=124)
External ear anomaly224/231214/23574/77
97% (80–98%)§91%96%
Cranial nerve dysfunction (VII, VIII and others)173/174?107/124
99% (62–100%)86%
Semicircular canal anomaly110/11794/9612/12
94% (39–98%)98%100%
Coloboma189/234190/25396/124
81% (68–84%)75%77%
Choanal atresia99/17995/24776/124
55% (35–71%)38%61%
Cleft lip and/or palate79/16379/24222/124
48% (28–70%)33%18%
Feeding difficulties necessitating tube feeding90/110?40/47
82% (32–93%)85%
Facial palsy80/12172/18717/47
66% (29–85%)39%36%
Anosmia on formal smell testing24/30??
80%
Genital hypoplasia118/145116/18745/124
81% (42–90%)62%36%
Congenital heart defect191/252193/250105/124
76% (68–78%)77%85%
Tracheo-oesophageal anomaly42/14635/18522/124
29% (15–63%)19%18%
Developmental delayDelayed motor milestones
147/149
99% (53–99%)
Intellectual disability
108/134
74% (39–91%)
Developmental delay 107/141
76%
Developmental delay 47/47
100%
Growth retardation35/94101/14180/124
37% (13–79%)72%65%
  • * CHD7 positive cohort from the literature as reviewed by Zentner et al in 2010.24 This cohort partially overlaps with our CHD7 positive cohort because the phenotypes of 64 of our patients were published previously.20 26 35–40

  • Cohort of patients with clinically diagnosed CHARGE syndrome reported by Tellier et al in 1998 and Issekutz et al in 2005, before CHD7 analysis was possible.7 34

  • Frequencies are represented as the number of patients with a particular feature/the total number of patients that were tested for that particular feature.

  • § The range of percentages presented between brackets was calculated as: (positive/total)×100%−(positive+unknown/total)×100% (for further explanation see text).

  • Outside the frequency range of patients with a CHD7 mutation.