Table 2

Comparison of methods for detecting mutations in BRCA12-150

Mutation type (number in set)2-150 Abnormal migration (%) Confirmation of mutation in abnormally migrating fragment (%) Total mutations reported correctly (%)
(A) SSCP
Frameshift (20)19/20 (95)17/18 (94)16/19 (84)
Base substitutions
 Nonsense (18)7/18 (39)7/7 (100)7/18 (39)
 Missense (15)12/15 (80)7/7 (100)7/10 (70)
 Splice (5)4/5 (80)3/3 (100)3/4 (75)
Total42/58 (72)34/35 (97)33/51 (65)
(B) CSGE
Frameshift (20)14/15 (93)11/14 (79)10/15 (67)
Base substitutions
 Nonsense (18)8/12 (67)8/8 (100)6/12 (50)
 Missense (15)10/15 (67)9/10 (90)9/15 (60)
 Splice (5)2/3 (67)2/2 (100)2/3 (67)
Total34/45 (76)30/34 (88)27/45 (60)
(C) TDGS
Frameshift (20)18/20 (90)18/18 (100)18/20 (90)
Base substitutions
 Nonsense (18)17/18 (94)16/16 (100)16/17 (94)
 Missense (15)14/15 (93)14/14 (100)14/15 (93)
 Splice (5)4/5 (80)3/3 (100)3/4 (75)
Total53/58 (91)51/51 (100)51/56 (91)
(D) DHPLC
Frameshift (20)20/20 (100)20/20 (100)20/20 (100)
Base substitutions
 Nonsense (18)18/18 (100)18/18 (100)18/18 (100)
 Missense (15)15/15 (100)15/15 (100)15/15 (100)
 Splice (5)5/5 (100)5/5 (100)5/5 (100)
Total58/58 (100)58/58 (100)58/58 (100)
  • 2-150 Discrepant values between the number of samples in the set and the number of samples analysed (denominator) reflect samples for which either PCR amplification failed or for which there was insufficient DNA for sequence analysis following initial screening.