TY - JOUR T1 - Retesting of women who are negative for a <em>BRCA1</em> and <em>BRCA2</em> mutation using a 20-gene panel JF - Journal of Medical Genetics JO - J Med Genet SP - 380 LP - 384 DO - 10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106403 VL - 57 IS - 6 AU - Jordan Lerner-Ellis AU - Victoria Sopik AU - Andrew Wong AU - Conxi Lázaro AU - Steven A Narod AU - George S Charames Y1 - 2020/06/01 UR - http://jmg.bmj.com/content/57/6/380.abstract N2 - Background The value of retesting women who previously tested negative for a pathogenic variant (mutation) in BRCA1 and BRCA2 using an expanded panel of breast and ovarian cancer genes is unclear.Methods We studied 110 BRCA1/2-negative women who were retested using a panel of 20 breast and/or ovarian cancer susceptibility genes at the Advanced Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory (AMDL) at Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto between March 2017 and March 2019. All patients had previously tested negative for BRCA pathogenic variants at the AMDL between January 2012 and March 2018 and were subsequently referred for retesting by their physician.Results Overall, six pathogenic variants in genes other than BRCA1 and BRCA2 were found (prevalence 5.5%). There were two pathogenic variants found in RAD51C, and one found in each of BRIP1, PALB2, PMS2 and PTEN. The prevalence of pathogenic variants was 6.5% for women affected with cancer (6 of 93), including 4.9% for women with breast cancer (4 of 82) and 22.2% for women with ovarian cancer (2 of 9). None of the 17 unaffected women had a clinically significant or pathogenic variant. There were 44 women (40%) for whom the result of the panel test was inconclusive due to the detection of a variant of uncertain significance.Conclusions Our findings indicate that the retesting of BRCA1/2-negative individuals with an expanded panel of 20 breast and ovarian cancer genes can produce clinically relevant results, with a yield of 5.5% for pathogenic variants in genes other than BRCA1 and BRCA2. ER -