I would like to bring to your attention an error with respect to the
original article by Amir et al.[1]
The paper validated a few available breast cancer risk
prediction models and compared them to the Tyrer-Cuzick model.[2] From the paper by Amir et al., I understand that they used
the Cyrillic plug-in to estimate breast cancer risk (Cyrillic 3.1
Version). Although, I am only fa...
I would like to bring to your attention an error with respect to the
original article by Amir et al.[1]
The paper validated a few available breast cancer risk
prediction models and compared them to the Tyrer-Cuzick model.[2] From the paper by Amir et al., I understand that they used
the Cyrillic plug-in to estimate breast cancer risk (Cyrillic 3.1
Version). Although, I am only familiar with Cyrillic version 2.1,
according to the home page for Cyrillic 3.1, it calculates risk
assessments according to the BRCAPRO and Mendel models. In their paper,
the authors referred to the Ford model [3] and at times to
the Claus models as the BRCAPro model, which is not correct. It will be
good to clarify on this to the research community, as this paper is an
important reference in breast cancer research in perspectives of risk
estimation and model development. BRCAPRO [4,5] is one of the eight models available through the
CancerGene program [6,7] Amir et al.[1] consistently made this mistake in their paper: in the introduction, study
tools section, Table 4, Table 5, Table 9, and in Figure 1. Clarification
of what models were validated for their data is needed.
The risk models most widely used in breast cancer research, and in
clinical and genetic counseling are the Gail model,[8] the
Claus model, [9,10] BRCAPRO,[4,5] Myriad I, also called the Shattuck-Eidens model,[11] Myriad II, also called the Frank model,[12] the Couch model,[13] also known as
the UPenn model, the NCI model,[14] and the Family
History Assessment Tool.[15] Among them, BRCAPRO
estimates the probability of an individual being a carrier of a
deleterious BRCA-1 or -2 mutation, along with estimating the predicted
breast cancer risk, while the Gail and Claus models are empirical models
developed prior to the identification of the BRCA genes. The Myriad and
Couch models are empirical models to estimate the probability of BRCA1 or
BRCA2 mutations. CancerGene,[6,7] is a
software program that incorporates all the aforementioned models into a
single software package. After all the pedigree information and other
epidemiological risk factors required for each of these models have been
entered, CancerGene calculates the risk for each model separately. The
best feature of the program is its ability to calculate an individual
woman’s predicted risk values and outputs from all these models, allowing
an oncologist, genetic counselor, researcher, or physician to compare the
values of predicted risk.
References
1. Amir E, Evans DG, Shenton A, Lalloo F, Moran A, Boggis C, Wilson M,
Howell A. Evaluation of breast cancer risk assessment packages in the
family history evaluation and screening programme. J Med Genet. 2003
Nov;40(11):807-14.
2. Tyrer JP, Duffy SW, Cuzick J. A breast cancer prediction model
incorporating familial and personal risk factors. Statist. Med. 2004;
23:1111–1130
3. Ford D, Easton DF, Bishop DT, Narod SA, Goldgar DE, the Breast Cancer
Linkage Consortium. Risk of cancer in BRCA-1 mutation carriers. Lancet
1994;343:692–5.
4. Berry DA, Parmigiani G, Sanchez J, et al. Probability of carrying a
mutation of breast-ovarian cancer gene BRCA1 based on family history. J
Natl Cancer Inst 1997; 89(3):227-238.
5. Parmigiani G, Berry D, Aguilar O. Determining carrier probabilities
for breast cancer-susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. Am J Hum Genet
1998; 62(1): 145-158.
6. Euhus DM. Understanding mathematical models for breast cancer risk
assessment and counseling. Breast J 2001; 7(4):224-232.
7. Euhus DM, Smith KC, Robinson L, Stucky A, Olopade OI, Cummings S,
Garber JE, Chittenden A, Mills GB, Rieger P, Esserman L, Crawford B,
Hughes KS, Roche CA, Ganz PA, Seldon J, Fabian CJ, Klemp J, Tomlinson G.
Pretest prediction of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation by risk counselors and the
computer model BRCAPRO. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002; 94(11):844-851.
8. Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, et al.: Projecting individualized
probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being
examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst 1989; 81(24):1879-1886.
9. Claus EB, Risch N, Thompson WD. Genetic analysis of breast cancer in the cancer and steroid hormone study.
Am J Hum Genet. 1991;48(2):232-42.
10. Claus EB, Risch N, Thompson WD. Autosomal dominant inheritance of early onset breast cancer:implications for risk prediction. Cancer 1994;73:643-51
11. Shattuck-Eidens D, Oliphant A, McClure M et al. BRCA1 sequence
analysis in women at high risk for susceptibility mutations. Risk factor
analysis and implications for genetic testing. JAMA 1997; 278:1242-1250.
12. Frank TS, Manley SA, Olopade OI et al. Sequence analysis of BRCA1 and
BRCA2: Correlation of mutations with family history and ovarian cancer
risk. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16:2417-2425.
13. Couch FJ, DeShano ML, Blackwood MA, et al. BRCA1 mutations in women
attending clinics that evaluate the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med
1997; 336:1409-1415.
14. Hartge P, Struewing JP, Wacholder S, Brody LC, Tucker MA. The
prevalence of common BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among Ashkenazi Jews. Am J
Hum Genet. 1999 Apr;64(4):963-70.
15. Gilpin CA, Carson N, Hunter AG. A preliminary validation of a family
history assessment form to select women at risk for breast or ovarian
cancer for referral to a genetics center. Clin Genet 2000; 58(4):299-308.
We read with great interest the report by Sng et al. [1] in which the
authors reported that the BRCA1 frameshift mutation 2845insA could be a
founder mutation in Malay breast or ovarian cancer patients in Singapore.
This mutation results in protein truncation at codon 914.
We would like to take this opportunity to draw the readers’ attention
to our work on BRCA1 mutations among Singapo...
We read with great interest the report by Sng et al. [1] in which the
authors reported that the BRCA1 frameshift mutation 2845insA could be a
founder mutation in Malay breast or ovarian cancer patients in Singapore.
This mutation results in protein truncation at codon 914.
We would like to take this opportunity to draw the readers’ attention
to our work on BRCA1 mutations among Singapore breast cancer patients. In
the initial study comprising 43 women with early-onset breast cancer
(before age 36), the same deleterious mutation as that reported by Sng et
al. was identified in 2 of 7 unrelated Malay women.[2] This led to a
further study on 49 unrelated Malay breast cancer patients, the results of
which were published in Human Mutation in August 2003.[3] Three patients
and three relatives of these patients carried the frameshift mutation.
Haplotype analysis using the microsatellite markers D17S855, D17S1323 and
D17S1325 showed a common haplotype for these cases and their relatives
with the mutation. This common haplotype was not seen in any of the
controls in both studies.[1,3]
In the report by Sng et al. [1], haplotype analysis of family members
of the six patients with the mutation was not done, as samples from
relatives were not available then, but this work is currently underway.
Haplotype analysis of the parents of two of the patients in our study,[3]
showed segregation of haplotypes to the patients, supporting the
suggestion that this may be a founder mutation.
In contrast to the studies on Singaporean Malays, this 2845insA
mutation was not detected in any of the 16 Malay breast cancer patients
from Malaysia.[4] However, this may be due to the small sample size in
that study.
The results of Sng et al. are consistent with ours, which strongly
suggest that the 2845insA mutation is a founder mutation in breast cancer
patients of Malay ethnicity. Indeed, once validated with a larger cohort
of Malays, comprising both breast cancer patients and normal subjects,
these results would facilitate genetic counselling and screening of
Malays.
References
(1) Sng J-H, Ali AB, Lee SC, Wong JEL, Blake V, Sharif A, Cross G,
Iau PTC. BRCA1 c.2845insA is a recurring mutation with a founder effect in
Singapore Malay women with early-onset breast/ovarian cancer. J Med Genet
2003;40:e117.
(2) Ho GH, Phang BH, Ng IS, Law HY, Soo KC, Ng EH. Novel germline
BRCA1 mutations detected in women in Singapore who developed breast
carcinoma before the age of 36 years. Cancer 2000;89:811-6.
(3) Lee ASG, Ho GH, Oh PC, Balram C, Ooi LL, Lim DTH, Wong CY, Hong
GS. Founder mutation in the BRCA1 gene in Lalay breast cancer patients
from Singapore. Hum Mutat 2003;22:178.
(4) Balraj P, Khoo AS, Volpi L, Tan JA, Nair S, Abdullah H. Mutation
analysis of the BRCA1 gene in Malaysian breast cancer patients. Singapore
Med J 2002;43:194-7.
Wilcken et al, (2003), in “Geographical and ethnic variation of the
677C>T allele of the 5,10 methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR):
finds from over 7000 newborns from 16 areas worldwide” showed that the TT
genotype in Calgary, Alberta was present in 5.8% of newborns as compared
to one previous report from Quebec of 11% [Infante-Rivard et al., 2003].
The authors did not explain why this...
Wilcken et al, (2003), in “Geographical and ethnic variation of the
677C>T allele of the 5,10 methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR):
finds from over 7000 newborns from 16 areas worldwide” showed that the TT
genotype in Calgary, Alberta was present in 5.8% of newborns as compared
to one previous report from Quebec of 11% [Infante-Rivard et al., 2003].
The authors did not explain why this difference was present, but they did
state that the latter study was drawn from a selected population of
infants over the 10th percentile, whereas their own study involved
consecutive newborns.
We suggest that the difference in the frequency seen in Alberta and
Quebec more likely reflects the ethnic origin of Albertans versus the
Quebeçois. Most Quebec residents are descendants of immigrants from France
and the province has a larger proportion of Greeks and Italians compared
to other Canadian jurisdictions. Caucasians in Alberta are generally the
descendants of Northern and Eastern Europeans with 50% of the population
being descendents of immigrants from the UK and Ireland [Population by
ethnic origin,1996]. French, Italy and Greece all have a higher frequency
of C677T MTHFR than eastern and northern European countries. Therefore, it
is not surprising that the Quebeçois also have higher frequencies than
Albertans. There have also been five other C677T MTHFR association studies
in Quebec that included small control groups variously selected with
homozygote frequencies ranging from 11 to 16% [Deloughery et al., 1996,
Christensen et al., 1997, 1999, Delvin 2000, Merouani et al., 2001.]
The largest single study of C677T MTHFR frequency was conducted using
newborn screening filter paper cards here in Manitoba. Mogk et al (2000),
genotyped 977 consecutive Manitoba newborns for the 677 C>T
polymorphism and found the frequency of 677 C>T homozygotes to be 7%.
The percentage of TT genotypes in Manitoba is 7% (36% heterozygotes).
Manitoba has the second largest ethnically French population in Canada and
has a substantial Metis (French/Aboriginal) population. We would therefore
expect the frequency in Manitoba to be intermediate between that of Quebec
and Alberta, as our data indicate. It is our opinion that both the 5.8%
Alberta result and the 11% Quebec result are accurate estimates of the
frequencies of this variant in these two ethnically different Canadian
provinces.
Reference
(1) Population by ethnic origin, 1996 Census, provinces and
territories.2003a. Statistics Canada
(2) Christensen B, Arbour L, Tran P, Leclerc D, Sabbaghian N, Platt
R, Gilfix BM, Rosenblatt DS, Gravel RA, Forbes P, Rozen R.5-21-
1999.Genetic polymorphisms in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase and
methionine synthase, folate levels in red blood cells, and risk of neural
tube defects. Am J Med Genet 84:151-157.
(3) Christensen B, Frosst P, Lussier-Cacan S, Selhub J, Goyette P,
Rosenblatt DS, Genest J, Jr., Rozen R.1997.Correlation of a common
mutation in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene with plasma
homocysteine in patients with premature coronary artery disease.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 17:569-573.
(4) Deloughery TG, Evans A, Sadeghi A, McWilliams J, Henner WD,
Taylor LM, Jr., Press RD.12-15-1996.Common mutation in
methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase. Correlation with homocysteine
metabolism and late-onset vascular disease. Circulation 94:3074-3078.
(5) Delvin EE, Rozen R, Merouani A, Genest J, Jr., Lambert
M.2000a.Influence of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase genotype, age,
vitamin B-12, and folate status on plasma homocysteine in children. Am J
Clin Nutr 72:1469-1473.
(6) Infante-Rivard C, Rivard GE, Yotov WV, Genin E, Guiguet M,
Weinberg C, Gauthier R, Feoli-Fonseca JC.7-4-2002.Absence of association
of thrombophilia polymorphisms with intrauterine growth restriction. N
Engl J Med 347:19-25.
(7) Merouani A, Lambert M, Delvin EE, Genest J, Jr., Robitaille P,
Rozen R.2001.Plasma homocysteine concentration in children with chronic
renal failure. Pediatr Nephrol 16:805-811.
(8) Mogk RL, Rothenmund H, Evans JA, Carson N, Dawson AJ.2000b.The
frequency of the C677T substitution in the methylenetetrahydrofolate
reductase gene in Manitoba. Clin Genet 58:406-408.
(9) Wilcken B, Bamforth F, Li Z, Zhu H, Ritvanen A, Redlund M, Stoll
C, Alembik Y, Dott B, Czeizel AE, Gelman-Kohan Z, Scarano G, Bianca S,
Ettore G, Tenconi R, Bellato S, Scala I, Mutchinick OM, Lopez MA, de Walle
H, Hofstra R, Joutchenko L, Kavteladze L, Bermejo E, Martinez-Frias ML,
Gallagher M, Erickson JD, Vollset SE, Mastroiacovo P, Andria G, Botto
LD.2003b.Geographical and ethnic variation of the 677C>T allele of 5,10
methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR): findings from over 7000
newborns from 16 areas world wide. J Med Genet 40:619-625.
In their letter Ayoub et al. suggest that Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome (PJS)
can be distinguished from Laugier Hunziker Syndrome (LHS) by histological
examination of the pigmented macules[1] and suggest that the
pigmented macules in PJS are histologically lentigos showing increased
numbers of normal melanocytes whereas in LHS the histology shows no
increase in melanocyte numbers. They support their ar...
In their letter Ayoub et al. suggest that Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome (PJS)
can be distinguished from Laugier Hunziker Syndrome (LHS) by histological
examination of the pigmented macules[1] and suggest that the
pigmented macules in PJS are histologically lentigos showing increased
numbers of normal melanocytes whereas in LHS the histology shows no
increase in melanocyte numbers. They support their argument with three
references (Calnan, 1960; Dupre and Viraben, 1990; Ortonne, 1999).[2-4] Based
on a wider assessment of the literature we do not believe that the
histological findings in PJS and LHS are as distinct as Ayoub et al.
suggest.
The following reports have shown no increase in melanocyte numbers in PJS.
Yamada et al. reported three cases of PJS in which they had examined
samples of the pigmented macules with both light and electron microscopy.[5] They found pigmentation in the basal layer of the
epidermis with no differences between the lesions and normal skin in the
number of melanocytes. These findings were consistent at all sites studied
which included the lip, fingers and toes. The dendrites of the melanocytes
in the lesions were longer and more branched than those in normal skin.
Gregory and Ho in their review of the cutaneous manifestations of
gastrointestinal disorders described the pigmented macules of PJS as
showing increased melanin granules in the basal layer keratinocytes and
dermis and either normal or increased numbers of melanocytes.[6] Other articles have reported elevated numbers of melanocytes.[4,7] One is forced to conclude that in PJS there
can either be normal or increased melanocytes in the pigmented macules
compared with normal skin.
In the case of LHS the majority of reports of LHS show normal melanocyte
numbers on histology .[8,9] One
report describes an increase in melanocyte numbers in LHS.(10)
In conclusion in both PJS and LHS there are reports of both normal
and increased numbers of melanocytes within the pigmented macules. We
therefore disagree with Ayoub et al and suggest that at present there is
uncertainty about the nature of the histological appearances of PJS and
LHS. Taken on their own the histological features are not diagnostic and
over-reliance on histology in the diagnosis of these syndromes could lead
to diagnostic error.
We agree that genetic screening is not required routinely in all cases of
suspected LHS. It is interesting to speculate that some of the confusion
alluded to above arises from incorrect clinical diagnosis. In our patient
the diagnosis was made clinically based on the late appearance of
pigmentation, the history of negative GI investigation and on the clinical
dermatological findings.[11] Formal genetic screening was
only performed at the request of the reviewers.
References
(1) Ayoub, N. M. (2003). Dissimilar histological features in Peutz-
Jeghers syndrome and Laugier-Hunziker syndrome. Journal of Medical
Genetics 40, e77.
(2) Calnan CD. The Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. Trans St John'sHosp Dermatol
Soc 1960; 44: 58-64.
(3) Dupre, A., and Viraben, R. (1990). Laugier's disease. Dermatologica
181, 183-6.
(4) Ortonne, J. (1999). Les troubles de la pigmentation cutanee. In
Dermatologie et maladies sexuellment transmissibles, G. E. Saurat JH,
Laugier P, Lachapelle JM, ed. (Paris: Masson), pp. 407-426.
(5) Yamada, K., Matsukawa, A., Hori, Y., and Kukita, A. (1981).
Ultrastructural studies on pigmented macules of Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. J
Dermatol 8, 367-77.
(6) Gregory, B., and Ho, V. C. (1992). Cutaneous manifestations of
gastrointestinal disorders. Part I. J Am Acad Dermatol 26, 153-66.
(7) McKee, P. Pathology of the skin, Second Edition (London: Mosby-
Wolfe).
(8) Kemmett, D., Ellis, J., Spencer, M. J., and Hunter, J. A. (1990). The
Laugier-Hunziker syndrome--a clinical review of six cases. Clin Exp
Dermatol 15, 111-4.
(9) Veraldi, S., Cavicchini, S., Benelli, C., and Gasparini, G. (1991).
Laugier-Hunziker syndrome: a clinical, histopathologic, and
ultrastructural study of four cases and review of the literature. J Am
Acad Dermatol 25, 632-6.
(10) Koch, S. E., LeBoit, P. E., and Odom, R. B. (1987). Laugier-Hunziker
syndrome. J Am Acad Dermatol 16, 431-4.
(11) Lampe, A. K., Hampton, P. J., Woodford-Richens, K., Tomlinson, I.,
Lawrence, C. M., and Douglas, F. S. (2003). Laugier-Hunziker syndrome: an
important differential diagnosis for Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. J Med Genet
40, e77.
We read with attention and interest the eLetter by Been et al.[1] We would like to reply.
We agree with the author that Smith-Magenis syndrome (SMS)
may be may be an extremely advanced sleep phase syndrome. The definition
of this advanced sleep phase syndrome is based actually on clinical
evaluation and melatonin dosages. A mutation of Perclock gene was found
in families with familial...
We read with attention and interest the eLetter by Been et al.[1] We would like to reply.
We agree with the author that Smith-Magenis syndrome (SMS)
may be may be an extremely advanced sleep phase syndrome. The definition
of this advanced sleep phase syndrome is based actually on clinical
evaluation and melatonin dosages. A mutation of Perclock gene was found
in families with familial advances sleep phase syndrome, but there is no
evidence of this mutation in non familial cases and Per gene is not
deleted in SMS.
Following this hypothesis, it is of interest to try a treatment by
melatonin in the morning to reset the melatonin secretion of this hormone
in SMS. That is what the authors of the letter did, with success.
Meanwhile, there is only one case studied, and they have no objective
proof of the results, such as plasmatic melatonin dosages or
polysomnography or actimetry recordings.
In our study, the main purpose was to act on the symptoms and to blockade
the endogenous melatonin secretion to improve day behaviour
(hyperactivity, tantrums, excessive daytime sleepiness) and then reset the
clock by adding melatonin in the evening. Our study in 9 children is
confirmed by melatonin dosages and actimetry recordings.
The mechanism of melatonin phase shift in SMS is not yet known, and
treatment approach acting on the mechanism as L. Bok did is very
interesting and the good results he obtained encourage further studies. In
the same order we could imagine using phototherapy in the morning in SMS.
The difficulty is to have large series of patients of this rare disorder,
and to make double-blind series if possible, with bioethical approved
protocols.
Reference
(1) Been J et al. Improvement of sleep disturbances and behaviour in Smith-Magenis syndrome with morning melatonin [electronic response to de Leersnyder et al. Beta-adrenergic antagonists and melatonin reset the clock and restore sleep in a circadian disorder, Smith-Magenis syndrome] jmedgenet.com 2003http://jmg.bmjjournals.com/cgi/eletters/40/1/74#30
In their electronic letter Smith et al.[1] claim to have found evidence that adult Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) patients with maternal uniparental disomy (UPD) have an increased mortality compared to PWS patients with deletion (Del). The main results can be summarised as in Table 1.
In their electronic letter Smith et al.[1] claim to have found evidence that adult Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) patients with maternal uniparental disomy (UPD) have an increased mortality compared to PWS patients with deletion (Del). The main results can be summarised as in Table 1.
Dead
Alive
Total
UPD
4
4
8
Del
5
17
22
Total
9
21
30
Table 1 Prader-Willi syndrome patients: Number of UPD and Del divided into dead and alive.
Obviously, 50% (4/8) of UPD patients and 23% (5/22) of Del patients died during follow-up. The events are few, and the difference is far from significant (P=0.20; Fisher's exact test). However, Smith et al. claim that 44% (4/9) with UPD died while 18% (4/22) with UPD were still alive. Similar calculations were made for the Del patients, and a P-value of 0.05 is mentioned. These calculations make no sense. We are unable to guess the source of the significant P-value.
A reasonable mortality comparison should include the time at risk; it was 44 years in the UPD group and 95 years in the Del group. A Cox regression gave a hazard ratio of 1.31 (95% CI 0.32-5.33; P=0.37) when comparing UPD with Del, adjusted for age and sex. We are, however, not certain about this result due to inconsistent information in Table 2 concerning age on admission, age at death, and follow-up time for three patients (e.g. patient F13 was 17 years on admission and 22 years at death, but had a follow-up time of 0 years). For these patients we recalculated the follow-up time, using the time span from admission to death.
Thus, the results cannot be considered to give any evidence of an increased mortality among UPD compared to Del patients or vice versa. PWS patients, especially those with UPD, and their families should not have added any further unjustified reason to worry.
Reference
(1) Smith A, Loughnan G, Steinbeck K. Death in adults with Prader-Willi syndrome may be correlated with maternal uniparental disomy. J Med Genet 2003;40:e63.
Smith-Magenis syndrome is a genetic syndrome associated with interstitial
deletions of chromosome 17p11.2. Main features include congenital
anomalies, abnormal behaviour and sleep/wake rhythm abnormalities.[1] The
latter have been shown to result from a reversed circadian rhythm of
melatonin.[2,3] Normally, secretion of melatonin peaks at night and is
minimal during the day. In Smith-Magenis syndrome mel...
Smith-Magenis syndrome is a genetic syndrome associated with interstitial
deletions of chromosome 17p11.2. Main features include congenital
anomalies, abnormal behaviour and sleep/wake rhythm abnormalities.[1] The
latter have been shown to result from a reversed circadian rhythm of
melatonin.[2,3] Normally, secretion of melatonin peaks at night and is
minimal during the day. In Smith-Magenis syndrome melatonin reaches a peak
in the daytime and is lowest during the night.[2,3] This results in early
onset and offset of sleep, frequent waking during the night and
hypersomnia during the day.[1]
The inversion of the circadian rhythm of melatonin in Smith-Magenis
syndrome can be considered as an extremely advanced or an extremely
delayed melatonin rhythm. The therapeutic consequences differ: melatonin
rhythm can maximally be delayed with exogenous melatonin administered 10
hours after endogenous melatonin onset and maximally be advanced by
exogenous melatonin administered 5 hours before endogenous melatonin onset.[4] We hypothesised that sleep disturbances in Smith-Magenis syndrome
result from an extremely advanced melatonin rhythm. Consequently, we
treated a patient with Smith-Magenis syndrome with melatonin, administered
after endogenous melatonin onset.
Case report
A boy with Smith-Magenis syndrome was referred to our outpatient clinic at
age eight years. He had been diagnosed with the syndrome at age three
years, after evaluation for developmental delay. The diagnosis had been
confirmed by demonstration of a 17p11.2 deletion by FISH analysis. At the
time of referral, the boy¡¦s parents reported serious disturbances of both
sleep and behaviour. Mean onset of sleep was at 7.30 pm, with mean waking
at 4.30 am. Moreover, there was frequent nocturnal waking and need for
naps during the day. The main behavioural symptoms experienced were
hyperactivity and tantrums. Because of this uncontrollable behaviour, the
boy had been institutionalised. The boy was treated with a morning regimen
of melatonin alone. Initially, melatonin 3 mg was administered at 4 am.
Over the next weeks, the time of administration was shifted towards 7 am,
and some time later to 8 am. Mean waking was delayed to 7 am, and
disappearance of both night awakenings and the need for naps during the
day were reported. The time of onset of sleep was not influenced by the
treatment. Thus, with treatment mean gain in sleep was two-and-a-half
hours. In addition, behavioural disturbances improved significantly with
this treatment as well. At the time of this report, the boy has been
treated with this regimen for over a year and results have been
consistently positive.
Discussion
Behavioural symptoms and sleep disturbances in Smith-Magenis syndrome have
a major impact on patients and their families. A therapeutic regimen using
beta1-adrenergic antagonists has been reported to improve both behaviour
and sleep disturbances in Smith-Magenis syndrome.[5] More recently,
addition of evening melatonin suppletion to this regimen has been reported
to enhance this positive effect.[6] Nine children were treated with a
combination of morning acebutolol and evening melatonin, which resulted in
a mean delay in sleep onset of 30 minutes and in waking by 60 minutes. The
mean gain in sleep in this report was 30 minutes (rate not mentioned). The
authors do not mention the considerations for administration of melatonin
in the evening. Yet, evening suppletion seems logical, as by this the
melatonin peak is reached at its physiological time at night.
As mentioned, we postulated that sleep disturbances in Smith-Magenis
syndrome result from an extremely advanced melatonin rhythm. From the
observations of the natural sleep-wake rhythm in our patient, we
considered the endogenous melatonin onset to be around 7 p.m. Previous
observations have shown serum melatonin peaks around this time in several
other Smith-Magenis patients.[3,5,6] Consequently, we treated our patient
with melatonin administered several hours after this moment, with the time
of administration gradually being shifted towards a normal waking time.
With this treatment, the boy¡¦s waking time shifted along with the time of
administration. By this, eventual gain in sleep was two-and-a-half hours.
In contrast, De Leersnijder et al. reported a mean gain in sleep of 30
minutes with melatonin and acebutolol, and no gain in sleep as much as two
-and-a-half hours was reached in any of the nine children studied.[6]
This suggests that a treatment regimen with morning melatonin may be more
successful in restoring a normal sleep pattern in Smith-Magenis syndrome
than is treatment with both a beta1-adrenergic antagonist and evening
melatonin. Thus far, our observations have been limited to a single case.
Yet, in our opinion the results of treatment in this case are solid and
may point to a new direction in the search of adequate therapy of sleep
disturbances in Smith-Magenis syndrome.
The observations in this case support our hypothesis that sleep
disturbances in Smith-Magenis syndrome are due to advancement of the
endogenous melatonin rhythm. The circadian disorder in Smith-Magenis
syndrome may well reflect an Advanced Sleep Phase Syndrome, characterised
by an advanced sleep-wake and melatonin rhythm.[7] In this syndrome, a
defect in the Per2 clock gene has been demonstrated,[8] whereas in the
Delayed Sleep Phase Syndrome, characterised by a delayed sleep-wake and
melatonin rhythm, a defective Per3 clock gene has been found.[9] Clock
genes of Smith-Magenis patients are currently under investigation and may
provide further insight in the nature of the underlying sleep syndrome.
References
(1) Greenberg F, Lewis RA, Potocki L, Glaze D, Parke J, Killian J, Murphy
MA, Williamson D, Brown F, Dutton R, McCluggage C, Friedman E, Sulek M,
Lupski JR. Multi-disciplinary clinical study of Smith-Magenis syndrome
(deletion 17p11.2). Am J Med Genet 1996;62(3): 247-54.
(2) Potocki L, Glaze D, Tan DX, Park SS, Kashork CD, Shaffer LG, Reiter RJ,
Lupski JR. Circadian rhythm abnormalities of melatonin in Smith-Magenis
syndrome. J Med Genet 2000;37:428-433.
(3) De Leersnyder H, De Blois, MC, Claustrat B, Romana S, Albrecht U, Von
Kleist-Retzow JC, Delobel B, Viot G, Lyonnet S, Vekemans M, Munnich A.
Inversion of the circadian rhythm of melatonin in the Smith-Magenis
syndrome. J Pediatr 2001;139:111-116.
(4) Lewy AJ, Ahmed S, Jackson JM, Sack RL. Melatonin shifts human circadian
rhythm according to a phase-response curve. Chronobiol Int 1992;9(5):380-392.
(5) De Leersnyder H, De Blois MC, Vekemans M, Sidi D, Villain E, Kindermans
C, Munnich A. ƒÒ1-adrenergic antagonists improve sleep and
behavioural disturbances in a circadian disorder, Smith-Magenis syndrome. J Med Genet 2001;38:586-590.
(6) De Leersnyder H, Bresson JL, De Blois MC, Souberbiele JC, Mogenet A,
Delhotal-Landes B, Salefranque F, Munnich A. ƒÒ1-adrenergic
antagonists and melatonin reset the clock and restore sleep in a circadian
disorder, Smith-Magenis syndrome. J Med Genet 2003; 40:74-78.
(7) Wiz-Justice A, Armstrong SM. Melatonin: nature¡¦s soporific? J Sleep Res
1996; 5(2):137-141.
(8) Toh KL, Jones CR, He Y, Eide EJ, Hinz WA, Virshup DM, Ptacek LJ, Fu YH.
An hPer2 phosphorylation site mutation in familial advanced sleep phase
syndrome. Science 2001;291(5506):1040-1043.
(9) Archer NS, Robilliard DL, Skene DJ, Smits M, Williams A, Arendt J,
Schantz MV. A length polymorphism in the circadian clock gene Per3 is
linked to delayed sleep phase syndrome and extreme diurnal preference. Sleep 2003;26:413-415.
This letter is in reference to the recent article by Zito et al.[1]
This
very interesting article presents evidence for the association
between a frameshift mutation (845-846delTG) in exon 8 of the
RPGR gene and an X-linked syndrome inclusive of retinitis
pigmentosa, impaired hearing and sino-respiratory infections.
We would like to take this opportunity to draw the readers’...
This letter is in reference to the recent article by Zito et al.[1]
This
very interesting article presents evidence for the association
between a frameshift mutation (845-846delTG) in exon 8 of the
RPGR gene and an X-linked syndrome inclusive of retinitis
pigmentosa, impaired hearing and sino-respiratory infections.
We would like to take this opportunity to draw the readers’
attention to our companion paper,[2] forthcoming in the November
issue of the Journal of Medical Genetics, in which we provide
evidence for an American family with an identical phenotype
associated with a missense mutation (G173R) in the RPGR gene.
In our work, we corroborate the clinical conclusion of a plausible
association between this newly characterized syndrome and
defects in RPGR function reached by Zito et al.[1] and our group
by providing immunohistochemical evidence that not only RPGR is
expressed in the human retina, but also along the luminal side of
the epithelial lining of human bronchi and sinuses, and at several
locations within the human and monkey cochlea.[2] The latter
pattern of expression is consistent with the possibility that defective
RPGR function could lead to hearing loss independently of
recurrent otitis as a result of a sensorineural mechanism.
Indeed, the report of Zito et al.[1] and ours [2] follow previous
ones
in which either recurrent infections [3,4] or pure sensorineural
hearing loss [5] had been observed independently in association
with X-linked retinitis pigmentosa and RPGR gene defects. In
addition, in parallel to the work of our groups, Hong et al.[6] have
recently provided corroboration to our human findings by
identifying expression of RPGR also in the epithelial lining of the
mouse trachea.
In summary, these novel findings provide evidence in favor of a
broader phenotypic range in association with RPGR mutations
than previously recognized and suggest an important role for
RPGR also in the respiratory tract and in the cochlea. Even when a
history of infections is present, the observed clinical phenotype
can be easily confused with that of Usher syndrome and, in some
cases, can be indistinguishable from it.[5] The counseling
implications of an incorrect diagnosis of Usher syndrome, which is
transmitted as an autosomal recessive trait, are immediately
evident. Diagnosing this newly recognized clinical entity of X-
linked pseudo-Usher syndrome will require a high degree of
awareness and a high index of suspicion by ophthalmologists,
geneticists, otolaryngologists, and pediatricians alike.
References
(1) Zito I, Downes SM, Patel RJ, Cheetham ME, Ebenezer ND,
Jenkins SA, Bhattacharya SS, Webster AR, Holder GE, Bird AC,
Bamiou DE, and Hardcastle AJ. RPGR mutation associated with
retinitis pigmentosa, impaired hearing, and sinorespiratory
infections. J Med Genet 2003;40:609-615.
(2) Iannaccone A, Breuer DK, Wang XF, Kuo SF, Normando EM,
Filippova E, Baldi A, Hiriyanna S, MacDonald CB, Baldi F,
Cosgrove D, Morton CC, Swaroop A, Jablonski MM. Clinical and
immunohistochemical evidence for an X-linked retinitis
pigmentosa syndrome with recurrent infections and hearing loss in
association with an RPGR mutation. J Med Genet 2003; 40 (in press).
(3) van Dorp DB, Wright AF, Carothers AD, Bleecker-Wagemakers
EM. A family with RP3 type of X-linked retinitis pigmentosa: an
association with ciliary abnormalities. Hum Genet 1992;88:331-4.
(4) Dry KL, Manson FDC, Lennon A, Bergen AAB, van Dorp DB,
Wright AF. Identification of a 5'splice site mutation in the RPGR
gne in a family with X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (RP3). Hum Mutat
1999;13:141-5.
(5) Rosenberg T, Haim M, Hauch A-M, Parving A. The prevalence
of Usher syndrome and other retinal dystrophy-hearing impairment
associations. Clin Genet 1997;51:314-21.
(6) Hong D-H, Pawlyk B, Sokolov M, Strissel KJ, Yang J, Tulloch B,
Wright AF, Arshavsky VY, Li T. RPGR isoforms in photoreceptor
connecting cilia and the transitional zone of motile cilia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:2413–21.
We were very interested in the review article on telomeres by de
Vries et al.[1]
The authors comment
that all of the 3p terminal deletions reported in the literature were
microscopically visible, except for two siblings with an unbalanced
familial translocation. We have recently seen a child where we detected a
3p deletion on telomere analysis that was not visible by routine
cytogenetic...
We were very interested in the review article on telomeres by de
Vries et al.[1]
The authors comment
that all of the 3p terminal deletions reported in the literature were
microscopically visible, except for two siblings with an unbalanced
familial translocation. We have recently seen a child where we detected a
3p deletion on telomere analysis that was not visible by routine
cytogenetics.
The child in question was born at 38 weeks weighing 7lb 4 oz. At birth she
had dislocated hips and talipes equinovarus. She had marked dimples around
her ankles and elbows and deep palmar creases. She had notable facial
asymmetry with a right ptosis, mandibular asymmetry and a slightly small
right ear. She was a poor feeder requiring a gastrostomy and on follow-up
it became clear that she was globally developmentally delayed. Cardiac
evaluation revealed atrial and ventricular septal defects. She was
referred to the clinical genetics service at 14 months of age when she was
noted to have trigonocephaly. She also had small finger and toe nails,
especially of the 5th fingers and toes. An MRI scan showed some degree of
frontal lobe atrophy and slightly thin corpus callosum.
This case illustrates the value of telomere screening in selected
patients. Trigonocephaly has not been a clinical feature highlighted in
the discussion about the indications for telomere screening but given the
number of chromosome abnormalities that have been associated with this
finding, we believe that those children with developmental delay and
trigonocephaly should have telomere studies performed if the conventional
cytogenetic analysis is normal and there is no other likely cause such as
anticonvulsant exposure in utero.
Reference
(1) De Vries BBA, Winter R, Schinzel A, van Ravenswaaij-Arts C. Telomeres: a diagnosis at the end of the chromosomes
. J Med Genet 2003;40:385-398.
Regarding the article by Maher et al,[1] it should be noted that the correct method for calculating the required probability would be to use the binomial distribution. (Of course the Poisson approximation is
quite accurate here). However because of the highly skewed nature of the null distribution the appropriate probability for a two sided test is 0.004 ie the one sided
probability should not be dou...
Regarding the article by Maher et al,[1] it should be noted that the correct method for calculating the required probability would be to use the binomial distribution. (Of course the Poisson approximation is
quite accurate here). However because of the highly skewed nature of the null distribution the appropriate probability for a two sided test is 0.004 ie the one sided
probability should not be doubled. Of course, this does not affect the conclusions drawn.
Reference
(1) ER Maher, LA Brueton, SC Bowdin, A Luharia, W Cooper, TR Cole, F Macdonald, JR Sampson, CL Barratt, W Reik, and MM Hawkins. Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and assisted reproduction technology (ART). J Med Genet 2003;40:62-64.
Dear Editor
I would like to bring to your attention an error with respect to the original article by Amir et al.[1]
The paper validated a few available breast cancer risk prediction models and compared them to the Tyrer-Cuzick model.[2] From the paper by Amir et al., I understand that they used the Cyrillic plug-in to estimate breast cancer risk (Cyrillic 3.1 Version). Although, I am only fa...
Dear Editor
We read with great interest the report by Sng et al. [1] in which the authors reported that the BRCA1 frameshift mutation 2845insA could be a founder mutation in Malay breast or ovarian cancer patients in Singapore. This mutation results in protein truncation at codon 914.
We would like to take this opportunity to draw the readers’ attention to our work on BRCA1 mutations among Singapo...
Dear Editor
Wilcken et al, (2003), in “Geographical and ethnic variation of the 677C>T allele of the 5,10 methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR): finds from over 7000 newborns from 16 areas worldwide” showed that the TT genotype in Calgary, Alberta was present in 5.8% of newborns as compared to one previous report from Quebec of 11% [Infante-Rivard et al., 2003]. The authors did not explain why this...
Dear Editor
In their letter Ayoub et al. suggest that Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome (PJS) can be distinguished from Laugier Hunziker Syndrome (LHS) by histological examination of the pigmented macules[1] and suggest that the pigmented macules in PJS are histologically lentigos showing increased numbers of normal melanocytes whereas in LHS the histology shows no increase in melanocyte numbers. They support their ar...
Dear Editor
We read with attention and interest the eLetter by Been et al.[1] We would like to reply.
We agree with the author that Smith-Magenis syndrome (SMS) may be may be an extremely advanced sleep phase syndrome. The definition of this advanced sleep phase syndrome is based actually on clinical evaluation and melatonin dosages. A mutation of Perclock gene was found in families with familial...
Dear Editor
In their electronic letter Smith et al.[1] claim to have found evidence that adult Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) patients with maternal uniparental disomy (UPD) have an increased mortality compared to PWS patients with deletion (Del). The main results can be summarised as in Table 1.
Dear Editor
Smith-Magenis syndrome is a genetic syndrome associated with interstitial deletions of chromosome 17p11.2. Main features include congenital anomalies, abnormal behaviour and sleep/wake rhythm abnormalities.[1] The latter have been shown to result from a reversed circadian rhythm of melatonin.[2,3] Normally, secretion of melatonin peaks at night and is minimal during the day. In Smith-Magenis syndrome mel...
Dear Editor
This letter is in reference to the recent article by Zito et al.[1]
This very interesting article presents evidence for the association between a frameshift mutation (845-846delTG) in exon 8 of the RPGR gene and an X-linked syndrome inclusive of retinitis pigmentosa, impaired hearing and sino-respiratory infections.
We would like to take this opportunity to draw the readers’...
Dear Editor
We were very interested in the review article on telomeres by de Vries et al.[1]
The authors comment that all of the 3p terminal deletions reported in the literature were microscopically visible, except for two siblings with an unbalanced familial translocation. We have recently seen a child where we detected a 3p deletion on telomere analysis that was not visible by routine cytogenetic...
Dear Editor
Regarding the article by Maher et al,[1] it should be noted that the correct method for calculating the required probability would be to use the binomial distribution. (Of course the Poisson approximation is quite accurate here). However because of the highly skewed nature of the null distribution the appropriate probability for a two sided test is 0.004 ie the one sided probability should not be dou...
Pages