Article Text
PDF
Abstract
Background Caring for children with pathogenic neurodevelopmental Copy Number Variants (CNVs) (ie, deletions and duplications of genetic material) can place a considerable burden on parents and their quality of life. Our study is the first to examine the frequency of psychiatric diagnoses in mothers of children with CNVs compared with the frequency of psychiatric problems in age-matched mothers from a large community study.
Methods Case–control study. 268 mothers of children with a CNV diagnosed in a medical genetics clinic and 2680 age-matched mothers taking part in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children study.
Results Mothers of children with CNVs reported higher frequency of depression, anorexia, bulimia, alcohol abuse and drug addiction problems compared with the age-matched mothers from the community sample. Focusing on psychiatric problems arising immediately after the birth of the index child, we found that the levels of depression symptoms were similar between the two groups (48% in mothers of children with CNVs vs 44% in mothers of the community sample, p=0.43), but mothers of children with CNVs had higher frequency of anxiety symptoms (55%) compared with mothers from the community sample (30%, p=0.03).
Conclusion Our study highlights the need for healthcare providers to devise treatment plans that not only focus on meeting the child’s needs but also assess and, if needed, address the mental health needs of the parent.
- mental disorders
- pediatrics
- psychiatry
Data availability statement
No data are available. Due to data sharing restrictions, the data will not be publicly available; however, all scripts used in the study are available upon request.
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC
Caring for children with complex presentations of neurodevelopmental and physical health problems can be taxing for the mothers. High levels of emotional distress have previously been reported for mothers of children with developmental disabilities. An increasing number of children are now diagnosed with submicroscopic pathogenic CNVs, which increase risk of a range of mental health conditions. There is, however, a paucity of research evaluating the mental health of the mothers of these children.
WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS
Our study is the first to compare the frequencies of mental health symptoms in mothers of children with pathogenic CNVs and age-matched mothers from a large community study. We find that the mothers of children with pathogenic CNVs report more psychiatric problems.
HOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICY
Our findings highlight the need for the monitoring of the mental health problems of these parents as well as, if indicated, the provision of psychiatric support.
Introduction
Recent advances in genetic technologies have led to the detection of submicroscopic deletions or duplications of chromosomal regions, otherwise known as CNVs. Certain relatively rare CNVs have been shown to increase the risk of a number of neurodevelopmental and psychiatric conditions, including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorder and anxiety disorder,1 2 as well as other health problems.3
The multitude of physical and mental health comorbidities associated with pathogenic CNVs in children can place a considerable burden on parental caregiving.4 For example, there is evidence that caring for a child with developmental disorder can be taxing on the parent in terms of their emotional (eg, see Mori et al 5) and physical well-being (eg, see Laurvick et al 6). Research has indicated that mothers with a child with a developmental disability were more likely to experience difficulties coping with stress7 and reported worse emotional well-being relative to women from the general population.8 Moreover, mothers with these problems were more likely to have children who had more behavioural problems (eg, see Totsika et al 9).
Taking into account the ‘diagnostic odyssey’ that parents of children with CNVs often have to go through,10 which in turn can impact their quality of life,11 as well as the burden of caregiving on the parents placed by the multitude of physical and health comorbidities associated with pathogenic CNVs, there is paucity of research to examine the frequency of psychiatric problems in the parents of children with CNVs. Previous research has indicated high emotional distress in parents of children with CNV.4 However, our study is the first to examine the frequency of psychiatric symptoms in mothers of children with CNVs in comparison with age-matched mothers from a large community study. We hypothesised that mothers of children with CNVs have more psychiatric symptoms compared with mothers from the general population. Finally, studies of adults with pathogenic CNVs are indicating they are at a higher risk of psychiatric problems, including internalising disorder.12 13 We therefore hypothesised that mothers of children with CNVs who are also carriers of CNVs themselves, would experience more depression and anxiety, compared with mothers without these CNVs.
Methods
Samples
Mothers of children with CNV
Recruitment of children with CNV was performed through 14 genetics clinics across the UK and the charities Max Appeal, Unique and the 22Crew, as well as social media and word of mouth.
Children’s CNV genotypes were established from medical records as well as in-house genotyping at the Cardiff University MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics using microarray analysis. Considering our overarching goal of examining the psychopathology of mothers of children with CNVs, we considered it appropriate to also include all children who took part in face-to-face assessments in these studies, meaning that a variety of CNVs were represented. Variants were included if they were (1) pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines14 and/or (2) associated with neurodevelopmental outcomes.15
A total of 272 mothers with children with a CNV at the time of assessment (mean age 41.2 years, SD=9.8) and when their child was born (mean age 30.3 years, SD=7.0) were recruited from the Experiences of People with Copy Number Variants (ECHO) study (see https://www.cardiff.ac.uk/mrc-centre-neuropsychiatric-genetics-genomics/research/themes/developmental-psychiatry/echo-study-cnv-research) and the IMAGINE-ID study (http://www.imagine-id.org/). For a list of the children’s CNVs, see online supplemental table 1).
Supplemental material
For 33% of our sample (n=89) we also had information from the parents on whether the CNV was de novo or was inherited. Ten per cent of the mothers (n=9/89) were CNV carriers.
Mothers of children from a community sample
A total of 2680 mothers, matched for their age and the age of their child to the mothers of children with the CNV sample, were recruited from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). ALSPAC (http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/) is an ongoing population-based cohort which started with inviting pregnant women resident in Avon in the southwest of England, with expected dates of delivery from 1 April 1991 to 31 December 1992, to take part in the study. The initial number of pregnancies enrolled was 14 541 (for these, at least one questionnaire has been returned or a ‘Children in Focus’ clinic had been attended by 19 July 1999). These initial pregnancies resulted in a total of 14 676 fetuses, leading to 14 062 live births with 13 988 children who were alive at 1 year of age.16 17
Measures
Mothers of children with CNV
Psychopathology in the mothers of children with CNVs was assessed using the Parental Psychopathology section of the parent version of the Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Assessment (CAPA).18 The CAPA is a semistructured interview that generates categorical diagnoses as well as symptom counts of childhood psychopathology. The parental psychopathology section includes questions about a parent’s own psychopathology. Stem questions enquire about whether the parent has ever had depression, anxiety, panic, eating disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), psychosis, or problems with alcohol or drugs. If the parent answered ‘yes’ to any of these questions, subsequent questions were asked enquiring about the onset and the severity of the problem (ie, whether the subject sought treatment, received medication or was hospitalised). Information regarding onset was only coded by the rater if the parent could report an exact year of onset; therefore, age at onset data were missing in some instances. For more details, see https://devepi.duhs.duke.edu/measures/the-child-and-adolescent-psychiatric-assessment -capa/.
Mothers from community sample
Various questionnaires were administered to mothers at different time points of their child’s development. To enable comparisons with the ECHO study, we selected questions included in the questionnaires that (1) were phrased either identically or as close as possible to the questions asked in the CNV study and 2) were administered when the children and the mothers in the ALSPAC study were within a similar age range to the children and the mothers of the CNV study, in order to facilitate matching (see the Data Analysis section). For these reasons, we selected the mental health-related questions that were included in the ‘Mother and family’ questionnaire (Section A–standard ALSPAC health related questions; link to the questionnaire: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/media-library/sites/alspac/migrated/documents/ques-m13-mother-and-family.pdf) that was administered to mothers when their child was 8 years old, as the mean age of the mothers and the children was similar to the mean age of the mothers and children in the ECHO study. An example of the format of the questions is as follows: Have you ever had any of the following problems: bulimia (‘yes, had it recently’ (‘in past year’)/‘yes, in past, not recently’/‘no never’). The problems we included in our study were severe depression, bulimia, anorexia, alcohol abuse, drug addiction and anxiety. We considered as a ‘yes’, either ‘yes recently’ or ‘yes’ in the past’ answers. Taking into account that in the CNV study the questions about depression included treatment and hospitalisation, we compared this question with the question ‘Have you ever had severe depression’, which was included in the aforementioned questionnaire that was administered to mothers when their child was 11 years old.
Data analysis
We ran descriptive statistics using R V.3.6.0. To compare the frequency of psychiatric problems between the two samples, we matched the mothers based on their current age using the R ‘MatchIt’ package, with a proportion of 1 (genetic sample) to 10 (community sample). We then compared the frequencies of each group using χ2 tests.
Results
Psychiatric problems in mothers of children with CNV
The sociodemographic characteristics of the mothers of children with CNV are described in table 1. Depression was the most common psychiatric problem, affecting 54% (n=146) of the sample (table 2). Out of those, the majority sought treatment (84%, 121/144), and received medication (74%, 108/145), while 1% (13/132) was hospitalised. Of the 146 mothers reporting depressive symptoms, 88 indicated the onset, and of those, 43/88 (49%) reported their depressive symptoms started after the birth of their child with a CNV. Anxiety symptoms were reported by 31% (n=85) of the sample. Similar to depression, the majority of individuals sought treatment (73%, 61/83), and 55% (46/84) received medication for their anxiety, while 4% (3/84) were hospitalised. Of the 85 mothers who reported anxiety symptoms, 49 indicated the onset and of those, 55% (27/49) reported their anxiety started after the birth of their child. Other psychiatric symptoms reported included panics (29%), phobias (21%), anorexia and bulimia (12%), other problems (ie, psychotic or OCD-related disorders) (13%) and alcohol/drug problems (6%). We found no evidence that the frequency of depressive symptoms (χ2=0.77, p=0.38) or anxiety (χ2=0.01, p=0.92) was higher in mothers who also carried a CNV themselves (n=9), compared with mothers who did not (n=80) (table 3).
Sociodemographic characteristics of mothers of children with CNVs
Frequency of psychiatric problems in mothers of children with a CNV (n=272)
Comparisons of psychiatric symptoms’ frequencies between mothers of children with a CNV and mothers from the community sample, as well as before and after the birth of the child
Comparisons between mothers of children with CNV and community mothers
We did not have data on age for five mothers of children with CNV; therefore, our comparison of the frequency of depressive symptoms was based on 268 mothers of children with CNV and 2680 age-matched community mothers. Because the question in the community sample did not correspond exactly to the question completed by the mothers of children with CNVs (see the Methods section), we compared the frequency of depressive symptoms in this group, with all three levels of the depression-related question in the mothers of children with CNV sample (table 3). Mothers of children with CNV had higher frequency of all the three levels of depressive symptoms compared with mothers from the community (p<0.001). Furthermore, mothers of children with CNV reported higher frequency of anorexia, bulimia, alcohol abuse and drug addiction symptoms, compared with mothers from the community sample.
The frequency of depressive symptoms arising post the birth of the index child was similar between mothers of children with CNV (48%) and mothers from the community sample (44%, p=0.43). There was, however, evidence of a difference in the frequency of anxiety symptoms arising post the birth of the index child (55% mothers of children with CNV vs 30% mothers from the community sample, p=0.03).
Discussion
Our study is the first to compare the frequency of psychiatric problems between mothers of children with CNVs and an aged-matched sample of mothers from a community study. The findings supported our hypothesis. Psychiatric problems, including depression, eating disorders and substance abuse/addiction, were more frequently reported by the mothers of children with CNVs, compared with mothers from the community sample. Studies in the general population (eg, see Goodman and Gotlib19) as well as on 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS)20 have indicated associations between parental and child psychopathology. However, the nature and direction of these associations is not yet clear. For example, it is possible that maternal psychiatric problems may increase the risk of psychiatric problems in the child via shared genetic background or via the family environment. Studies on 2q11.2DS, a pathogenic CNV associated with a 25-fold increased risk for schizophrenia, have indicated that environmental factors are related to the child’s mental health difficulties (eg, see Shashi et al and Allen et al 21 22). For example, a study by Allen et al 22 found that better parental organisation was associated with fewer difficulties in children with 22q11.2DS. Maternal psychiatric problems may contribute to a less structured family environment that could in turn increase risk of psychiatric problems in the child. On the other hand, it is also possible that the increased physical and mental health problems associated with the CNV in the child may increase the risk of depression and anxiety in the parent due to the high demands on parental caregiving. Longitudinal studies in families of children with developmental disabilities have indicated bidirectional relationships between parenting stress and child behaviour problems.23 Futures studies are needed to examine the relationship between parental psychopathology, family environment and child psychopathology in families of children with CNVs, cross-sectionally as well as longitudinally.
We did not find differences in the frequency of depressive and anxiety symptoms between mothers who were CNV carriers themselves compared with mothers who were not. This result is likely due to low power given the small sample sizes. Future studies are needed to better understand how maternal psychopathology may be related to child psychopathology in the context of pathogenic CNVs.
Anxiety symptoms were more frequently reported by mothers of children with CNV after the birth of their child with a CNV, compared with mothers from the community sample.
Our study highlights the need for the monitoring and early intervention for mental health symptoms as well as the effective management of established conditions, not only in children with neurodevelopmental risk CNVs but also their mothers. Indeed, our findings are in line with studies providing evidence that bringing up a child with a neurodevelopmental disorder can be taxing on the parent in terms of their emotional (eg, see Mori et al 5) and physical well-being (eg, see Laurvick et al 6). Research has identified that mothers with a child with a developmental disability were more likely to experience difficulties with coping with stress,7 as well as worse emotional well-being than women from the general population.8 9
Our study has some limitations. There are ascertainment differences across the studies (mothers of children with CNV were recently recruited because of their child’s genetic diagnosis, whereas ALSPAC mothers were originally recruited because they were pregnant and invited to take part in a birth cohort study). Also, the fact that children with CNVs were recruited from genetics clinics might indicate that they were enriched for more severe cases and parental distress, and as such, the rates of psychopathology may not be representative of the general population. Furthermore, there were also differences in the psychiatric assessment measures used in the two groups, and it was not possible to validate the questions asked in the community sample in the CNV sample or vice versa. It is therefore possible that we are over-reporting or under-reporting the differences between the two samples. Additionally, age of onset was not available for approximately 40% mothers of children with CNVs who reported depressive or anxiety symptoms. We do not know whether and how this relatively high non-response rate may have affected findings. Another limitation is that we did not examine whether and how the children’s psychopathology may influence their mothers. Future studies are needed to replicate and expand our results. Finally, given the age range of our samples, new incidences of depression are likely to occur. Thus, our study is likely to underestimate the overall frequency of depression in both samples.
In conclusion, we found higher frequencies of depressive symptoms and a number of other psychiatric problems in the mothers of children with CNVs compared with age-matched mothers from the community sample. We also found that the frequency of anxiety symptoms was higher in mothers of children with CNV after the birth of their child with a CNV, compared with mothers from the community sample. Our findings highlight the need for the monitoring as well as, where indicated, effective management of the mental health problems not only of the children with pathogenic CNVs but also their parents.
Data availability statement
No data are available. Due to data sharing restrictions, the data will not be publicly available; however, all scripts used in the study are available upon request.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Ethics approval
This study involves human participants and was approved by the National Health Service Wales Research (reference number: 12/WA/0232) and NHS London Queen Square research ethics committee (reference number: 14/LO/1069). Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part.Ethical approval was provided by the local research ethics committees and ALSPAC’s Law and Ethics Committee. Parents provided informed written consent and were allowed to withdraw at any time.
Acknowledgments
The authors are extremely grateful to all the families who took part in this study, the genetic clinics and charities and midwives for their help in recruiting them, and the whole Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, Experiences of People with Copy Number Variants and IMAGINE-ID study teams, which include interviewers, computer and laboratory technicians, clerical workers, research scientists, volunteers, managers, receptionists and nurses.
References
Supplementary materials
Supplementary Data
This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.
Supplementary Data
This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.
Footnotes
Twitter @MNiarchou
Collaborators IMAGINE-ID Consortium Membership: Kate Baker, Eleanor Dewhurst, Amy Lafont, F Lucy Raymond, Terry Shirley, Hayley Tilley, Husne Timur, Catherine Titterton, Neil Walker, Sarah Wallwork, Francesca Wicks, Zheng Ye, Marie Erwood (School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK), Sophie Andrews, Philippa Birch, Samantha Bowen, Karen Bradley, Aimee Challenger, Andrew Cuthbert, Peter Holmans, Sarah Law, Nicola Lewis, Sinead Morrison, Hayley Moss, Sinead Ray, Molly Tong (Medical Research Council Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, and Neuroscience and Mental Health Research Institute, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK), Nadia Coscini, Sarah Davies, Spiros Denaxas, Hayley Denyer, Nasrtullah Fatih, Manoj Juj, Ellie Kerry, Anna Lucock, William Mandy, Frida Printzlau, David Skuse, Ramya Srinivasan, Susan Walker, Alice Watkins, Jeanne Wolstencroft (NIHR BRC Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK), Beverly Searle, Anna Pelling (Unique – The Rare Chromosome Disorder Support Group, London, UK). IMAGINE-ID Clinical Collaborators: John Dean, Aberdeen, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary Genetics Service, NHS GRAMPIAN; Lisa Robertson, Aberdeen, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary Genetics Service, NHS GRAMPIAN; Denise Williams, Birmingham, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S NHS Foundation Trust; Alan Donaldson, Bristol, Bristol Clinical Genetics Service, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust; Lucy Raymond, Cambridge, East Anglian Medical Genetics Service, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Annie Procter, Cardiff, All Wales Regional Genetics Service, Cardiff and Vale University LHB; Jonathan Berg, Dundee, Ninewells Hospital Dundee Genetics Service; NHS Tayside; Yanick Crow, Edinburgh, Western General Hospital Edinburgh Genetics Service, NHS Lothian; Anne Lampe, Edinburgh, Western General Hospital Edinburgh Genetics Service, NHS Lothian; Julia Rankin, Exeter, Peninsula Genetics Service, ROYAL DEVON AND EXETER NHS FOUNDATION TRUST; Shelagh Joss, Glasgow, Glasgow Genetics Centre, NHS GREATER GLASGOW & CLYDE; Lyn Chitty, GOSH, London North East Thames Regional Genetics Service - Clinical Genetics, GREAT ORMOND STREET HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST; Frances Flinter, Guy's, London Guy's Hospital Genetic Centre, GUY'S AND ST THOMAS' NHS FOUNDATION TRUST; Muriel Holder, Guy's, London Guy's Hospital Genetic Centre, GUY'S AND ST THOMAS' NHS FOUNDATION TRUST; Alison Kraus, Leeds, Yorkshire Regional Genetics Service - Clinical Genetics, LEEDS TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS TRUST; Julian Barwell, Leicester, Leicestershire Genetics Centre, UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF LEICESTER NHS TRUST; Pradeep Vasudevan, Leicester, Leicestershire Genetics Centre, UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF LEICESTER NHS TRUST; Astrid Weber, Liverpool, Cheshire & Merseyside Regional Genetic Service, LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST; William Newman, Manchester, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, CENTRAL MANCHESTER UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST; Miranda Splitt, Newcastle, Northern Genetics Service, THE NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST; Virginia Clowes, North West Thames, London North West Thames Regional Genetics Service, NORTH WEST LONDON HOSPITALS NHS TRUST; Fleur van Dijk, North West Thames, London North West Thames Regional Genetics Service, North West London Hospitals NHS Trust; Rachel Harrison, Nottingham, Nottingham Regional Genetics Service, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust; Usha Kini, Oxford, Oxford Genetics Service, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust; Oliver Quarrell, Sheffield, Sheffield Genetic Services, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust; Diana Baralle, Southampton, Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust; Sahar Mansour, St George's, London South West Thames Regional Genetics Service, St George's Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust.
Contributors Conceptualisation of the study: MN and MvdB; data analyses: MN, ACC, SJRAC,HM and MS; data interpretation, writing, editing and reviewing drafts: all authors. MN accepts full responsibility for the work and/or conduct of the study, had access to the data, controlled the decision to publish, and acts as the study's guarantor.
Funding This research was funded by MRC grant Intellectual Disability and Mental Health: Assessing Genomic Impact on Neurodevelopment (MR/T033045/1; MvdB, JH, MO and SJRAC; MR/N022572/1 and MR/L011166/1; JH, MvdB and MO), a Wellcome Trust Strategic Award ‘Defining Endophenotypes From Integrated Neurosciences' (503147, MO and JH), Medical Research Council Programme Grant (G0800509, MO), the National Institute of Mental Health (5UO1MH101724. MvdB and MO), a Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Fund award (MvdB), the Waterloo Foundation (918-1234, MvdB), the Baily Thomas Charitable Fund (2315/1, MvdB) and Health & Care Research Wales (Welsh Government, 507556; MvdB). SJRAC is funded by a Medical Research Foundation Fellowship (MRF-058-0015-F-CHAW)
Competing interests JH, MO and MvdB are funded by a research grant from Takeda Pharmaceuticals outside the scope of the current work.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.