Article Text

Original research
Phenotypes in adult patients with Rett syndrome: results of a 13-year experience and insights into healthcare transition
  1. Angela Peron1,2,3,
  2. Maria Paola Canevini1,3,
  3. Filippo Ghelma1,4,
  4. Rosangela Arancio5,
  5. Miriam Nella Savini3,
  6. Aglaia Vignoli1,3
  1. 1 Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Lombardia, Italy
  2. 2 Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
  3. 3 Child Neuropsychiatry Unit - Epilepsy Center, San Paolo Hospital, Milan, Italy
  4. 4 Disabled Advanced Medical Assistance (DAMA), San Paolo Hospital, Milan, Italy
  5. 5 Pediatrics, San Paolo Hospital, Milan, Italy
  1. Correspondence to Dr Angela Peron, Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Lombardia, Italy; angela.peron{at}unimi.it

Abstract

Background Rett syndrome is a complex genetic disorder with age-specific manifestations and over half of the patients surviving into middle age. However, little information about the phenotype of adult individuals with Rett syndrome is available, and mainly relies on questionnaires completed by caregivers. Here, we assess the clinical manifestations and management of adult patients with Rett syndrome and present our experience in transitioning from the paediatric to the adult clinic.

Methods We analysed the medical records and molecular data of women aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of classic Rett syndrome and/or pathogenic variants in MECP2, CDKL5 and FOXG1, who were in charge of our clinic.

Results Of the 50 women with classic Rett syndrome, 94% had epilepsy (26% drug-resistant), 20% showed extrapyramidal signs, 40% sleep problems and 36% behavioural disorders. Eighty-six % patients exhibited gastrointestinal problems; 70% had scoliosis and 90% low bone density. Breathing irregularities were diagnosed in 60%. None of the patients had cardiac issues. CDKL5 patients experienced fewer breathing abnormalities than women with classic Rett syndrome.

Conclusion The delineation of an adult phenotype in Rett syndrome demonstrates the importance of a transitional programme and the need of a dedicated multidisciplinary team to optimise the clinical management of these patients.

  • health care facilities
  • manpower
  • and services
  • child health
  • adolescent medicine
  • genetics
  • genetics
  • medical

Data availability statement

Data are available on reasonable request. The datasets analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to privacy policy, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data are available on reasonable request. The datasets analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to privacy policy, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

View Full Text

Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

Footnotes

  • Contributors Conceptualisation of the ideas, formulation and evolution of research goals and aims, and writing the article: AP and AV. Revision of the article: MPC. Provision of study materials and patients’ management: FG, RA, MNS. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.