Responses

other Versions

PDF

Original article
Agalsidase alfa versus agalsidase beta for the treatment of Fabry disease: an international cohort study
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Comment on Agalsidase alfa versus agalsidase beta for the treatment of Fabry disease: an international cohort study
    • Malte Lenders, scientist University Hospital Muenster
    • Other Contributors:
      • Boris Schmitz, scientist
      • Stefan-Martin Brand, medical doctor
      • Eva Brand, medical doctor

    Dear Editor,

    in their recent study Arends and colleagues demonstrate a significant 2.8-fold increased risk for the formation of neutralizing anti-drug antibodies (ADA) in male patients with Fabry disease (FD) when treated with agalsidase-beta (1.0 mg/kg every other week) compared to agalsidase-alfa (0.2 mg/kg every other week).[1] Interestingly, Rombach and colleagues and later Smid and colleagues reported no significant differences in a humoral response, when using an identical dosage of 0.2 mg/kg for both drugs. [2,3] Hence, the 5-fold higher dosage of agalsidase-beta and not the compound itself seems to be an important trigger for antibody formation. However, none of the studies determined the cross reactive immunological status, which is crucial for the risk of a humoral response. The subgroup analysis of patients with ADAs by Arends and colleagues also revealed a better biochemical response to agalsidase-beta at 1.0 mg/kg in terms of decreasing lyso-Gb3 levels.[1] The authors propose that a saturation of antibody titers due to the 5-fold higher dosage might lead to the observed effect. In this respect, we recently demonstrated that antibodies can be supersaturated and that appropriate (i.e. individually optimized) enzyme dosages can overcome ADA titers already during infusions, which may result in improved patients’ outcome.[4] However, in the same study, we also demonstrated that even in patients treated with low-dose enzyme replacement therapy ADA titers can...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    Malte Lenders received speaker honoraria from Genzyme and Shire. Eva Brand received speaker honoraria from Amicus Therapeutics, Genzyme and Shire. Stefan-Martin Brand received speaker honoraria from Shire. Boris Schmitz has nothing to declare.