Article Text

other Versions

Download PDFPDF
Phenocopies in BRCA1 and BRCA2 families: Evidence for modifier genes and implications for screening?
  1. Audrey Smith (audrey.smith{at}cmmc.nhs.uk)
  1. St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom
    1. Anthony Moran
    1. North Western Cancer Registry, Centre for Cancer Epidemiology, Christie Hospital Manchester, United Kingdom
      1. Matthew Boyd
      1. St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom
        1. Mike Bulman
        1. St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom
          1. Andrew Shenton
          1. St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom
            1. Louise Smith
            1. University of Birmingham School of Medicine, and West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, United Kingdom
              1. R Iddenden
              1. North Western Cancer Registry, Centre for Cancer Epidemiology, Christie Hospital Manchester, United Kingdom
                1. Emma Woodward
                1. University of Birmingham School of Medicine, and West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, United Kingdom
                  1. Fiona Lalloo (fiona.lalloo{at}cmmc.nhs.uk)
                  1. St Marys Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom
                    1. Eamonn R Maher (e.r.maher{at}bham.ac.uk)
                    1. University of Birmingham, United Kingdom
                      1. Gareth Evans (gareth.evans{at}cmmc.nhs.uk)
                      1. St Mary's Manchester, United Kingdom

                        Abstract

                        Background: The identification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in familial breast cancer kindreds allows genetic testing of at risk relatives. Those who test negative are usually reassured and extra breast cancer surveillance discontinued. However, we postulated that in high-risk families, such as those seen in clinical genetics centres, the risk of breast cancer might be influenced not only by the BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation but also by modifier genes. One manifestation of this would be the presence of phenocopies within BRCA1/BRCA2 kindreds.

                        Methods: We reviewed 277 families with pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations and identified 28 breast cancer phenocopies. We assessed the relative risk of breast cancer in those testing negative using incidence rates from our local population based cancer registry.

                        Results: Phenocopies constituted up to 24% of tests on women with breast cancer following the identification of the mutation in the proband. The standardised incidence ratio for women who tested negative for the BRCA1/BRCA2 family mutation was 5.3 for all relatives, 5.0 for all first-degree relatives (FDRs) and 3.2 (95% confidence interval: 2.0-4.9) for FDRs in whose family all other cases of breast and ovarian cancer could be explained by the identified mutation. 13/107 (12.1%) of FDRs with breast cancer and no unexplained family history tested negative.

                        Conclusion: In high-risk families, women who test negative for the familial BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation had an increased risk of breast cancer consistent with genetic modifiers. In the light of this such women should still be considered for continued surveillance.

                        • BRCA1 and BRCA2
                        • breast cancer
                        • phenocopy

                        Statistics from Altmetric.com

                        Request Permissions

                        If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

                        Supplementary materials

                        • Files in this Data Supplement: