Article Text
Abstract
Albinism is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of conditions characterised by visual abnormalities and variable degrees of hypopigmentation. Multiple studies have demonstrated the clinical utility of genetic investigations in individuals with suspected albinism. Despite this, the variation in the provision of genetic testing for albinism remains significant. One key issue is the lack of a standardised approach to the analysis of genomic data from affected individuals. For example, there is variation in how different clinical genetic laboratories approach genotypes that involve incompletely penetrant alleles, including the common, ‘hypomorphic’ TYR c.1205G>A (p.Arg402Gln) [rs1126809] variant. Here, we discuss the value of genetic testing as a frontline diagnostic tool in individuals with features of albinism and propose a practice pattern for the analysis of genomic data from affected families.
- Genetics, Medical
- Genetic Testing
- Ophthalmology
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Background
Albinism is a group of conditions associated with reduced levels of melanin pigment that result in developmental visual system anomalies; skin and hair manifestations are also present in the majority of cases. Significant phenotypic variability has been described among affected individuals. The pigmentation of the skin, the hair and the uveal layer of the eye, for example, can range from very reduced to (almost) normal. The ophthalmic features, which are the hallmark of the condition, are also variable and can include nystagmus, reduced best-corrected visual acuity, photoaversion, iris transillumination, foveal hypoplasia and chiasmal misrouting of the optic nerves.1
At least 20 genetically distinct forms of albinism have been described. These can be caused by variants in genes encoding: melanogenic enzymes (TYR, TYRP1 and DCT); channels regulating melanosomal pH (OCA2 and SLC45A2) or calcium homeostasis within melanin-containing cells (SLC24A5); subunits of multiprotein complexes that are involved in melanosome maturation and/or trafficking of melanogenic enzymes (Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome [HPS] group of genes).2 Most forms of albinism are inherited as autosomal recessive traits apart from GPR143-related albinism, which is an X-linked recessive condition. Although it is possible that additional albinism-associated genes remain to be discovered, alterations in such genes are expected to explain only a very small fraction of cases. Indeed, pathogenic variants in two genes that have been recently implicated in albinism, DCT and BLOC1S5, were detected in only 2 of 1500 (0.13%) albinism cases each.3 4
Obtaining a precise genetic diagnosis in people with albinism:
Allows timely identification of the subset of affected individuals who are at risk of developing major complications (lung fibrosis, prolonged bleeding and/or granulomatous colitis in individuals with certain subtypes of HPS; immunodeficiency and neurodegeneration in individuals with Chediak-Higashi syndrome [CHS]). In these cases, early diagnosis can drive evidence-based changes in care management and result in improved outcomes (a relevant example can be found in the Cases section: proband 1).
Helps rule out differential diagnoses in individuals presenting with non-specific features such as nystagmus and/or foveal hypoplasia.
Facilitates accurate genetic counselling and can inform reproductive planning in affected individuals and families.
To reach a genetic diagnosis, integration of phenotypic and genomic information is required; family context and dynamic changes in pigmentation should also be taken into account. In this article, we discuss clinical genetic testing in individuals who have features of albinism and propose a molecular diagnostic decision tree.
Approach to genetic testing in albinism
An initial aim of genetic testing in individuals suspected of having albinism is the identification of single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and copy number variants (CNVs) impacting albinism-related genes. Additional analysis of other genes — such as FRDM7, SLC38A8 and PAX6 — is recommended; although these genes have been implicated in distinct conditions that do not generally feature hypopigmentation, the associated phenotypic spectra include characteristic ophthalmological manifestations of albinism. Notably, infants whose presentation is linked to changes in these three genes may have lightly pigmented skin/hair due to their familial/genomic background; this can increase the apparent overlap between these conditions and albinism.5
High-throughput DNA sequencing approaches are typically used for genetic variant detection. These approaches can be complemented by high-resolution array CGH (comparative genomic hybridization) analyses that focus on CNVs, which are thought to represent >10% of pathogenic alleles.5 It is noted that bioinformatic tools that mine sequencing data are increasingly replacing array CGH-based workflows.
Like other rare genetic disorders, molecular diagnostic practice patterns for albinism rely heavily on a search for low-frequency (rare), highly penetrant genetic variants. This reflects the wide acceptance of the rare disease – rare variant hypothesis which states that, if a disorder with a significant genetic component is rare, then the underlying genetic defect(s) will also be rare. However, in the past decade, a number of studies have challenged the universal nature of this paradigm and have highlighted the role of common genetic variation in rare phenotypes.6 7 In light of this and the findings of our recent work on albinism,8 we propose a three-step approach to the analysis of genetic data from patients with suspected albinism, i.e. individuals with at least one of the key ophthalmic features of the condition (for example prominent foveal hypoplasia) (figure 1).
Rare variant analysis
It is recommended that the initial focus remains on the detection and classification of rare SNVs and CNVs in relevant genes. Established criteria should be used to analyse these changes. Presently, most genetic laboratories use the variant classification system developed by the ACMG-AMP (American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology).9 10 This involves scoring genetic alterations and assigning them into one of the following five classes: benign (class 1), likely benign (class 2), variant of uncertain significance (VUS) (class 3), likely pathogenic (class 4) and pathogenic (class 5).
The presence of two class 4 or 5 variants in a gene of interest confirms a genetic diagnosis after phase has been established (unless the relevant gene is on the X-chromosome or it is associated with an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern, in which case, one such change can be sufficient). Variants of uncertain significance cannot contribute to a high-confidence genetic diagnosis that guides clinical decision making but are worth reporting, sharing in open-access databases (such as ClinVar) and being considered for reclassification at a later stage.
Common variant analysis
Common variation in the TYR gene (encoding tyrosinase) has been implicated in relatively mild forms of albinism since the early 1990s.11–13 We have recently shown that the presence of haplotypes that include specific alleles of three common TYR variants has similar effects to rare sequence alterations that have high penetrance.8 These three common variants are
TYR c.-301C>T [rs4547091], located in the promoter, with an allele frequency of ~60% (for the effect allele which can be described as c.-301C or c.-301) in non-Finnish European (NFE) populations in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD v2.1.1).
TYR c.575C>A (p.Ser192Tyr) [rs1042602], with a minor allele frequency of ~36% in gnomAD NFE populations.
TYR c.1205G>A (p.Arg402Gln) [rs1126809], with a minor allele frequency of ~27% in gnomAD NFE populations.
The relevant albinism-associated haplotypes are
TYR c.[−301C;575C>A;1205G>A]; this can also be described as TYR c.[−301=;575C>A;1205G>A] or [C;A;A]; the frequency of this haplotype in people with European-like ancestries is ~1%.
TYR c.[−301C;575C;1205G>A]; this can also be described as TYR c.[−301=;575=;1205G>A] or [C;C;A]; the frequency of this haplotype in people with European-like ancestries is ~0.3%.
It is recommended to seek these two rare haplotypes in the genetic data of individuals with suspected albinism who carry the TYR c.1205G>A change. Current evidence suggests that the presence of these haplotypes, either in the homozygous state or in trans to a TYR class 4 or 5 variant, would be sufficient to establish the genetic diagnosis, especially in people who have relatively mild forms of albinism (a relevant example can be found in the Cases section: proband 2). It is highlighted that the TYR c.-301C and the TYR c.575A (p.Ser192Tyr) alleles are frequently found in linkage disequilibrium so that the presence of the latter would, in most cases, suggest the presence of the former on the same haplotype.
Obtaining phase information
At present, the data generated by most DNA sequencing workflows take the form of unphased genotypes. As a result, it is generally not possible to directly observe on which of the two parental chromosomes (or haplotypes) a particular allele falls on. To address this, haplotype phasing must be performed in order to assign genetic variants to the corresponding paternal or maternal chromosomes.
Typically, the focus of haplotype phasing is heterozygous genotypes. Two main phasing methods have been described: mendelian phasing (which uses parental genotypes) and statistical phasing (which uses intermarker correlation). More recently, advances in long-read sequencing technologies have enabled phasing without relying on statistical inference or testing relatives.14 Nonetheless, the most commonly used phasing method in clinical practice at present involves analysing parental samples. This approach is imperfect as obtaining appropriate samples from relatives can be challenging; the analysis may uncover misattributed genetic relationships; testing of multiple individuals over more than one generation may be required to obtain fully informative genotypes.
In the context of albinism, phase information can help to (i) identify compound heterozygosity (for example, when two rare variants are detected) or (ii) to clarify the haplotypic structure around the TYR locus when common albinism-associated changes are present (a relevant example can be found in the Cases section: proband 3). In these scenaria, phasing can be key to obtaining a high-confidence genetic diagnosis.
Cases
Three cases are discussed further to illustrate the utility of genetic testing in albinism (proband 1) and to highlight the value of the proposed molecular diagnostic approach (probands 2 and 3).
Proband 1 was diagnosed with oculocutaneous albinism in the first few months of life. He presented with nystagmus and was found to have iris transillumination, fundal hypopigmentation, and a featureless fovea. His skin and hair were moderately pigmented and there were no other concerns about his health/development. There was no family history of albinism or visual problems. Genetic testing was requested and revealed a homozygous HPS5 c.1507G>T (p.Glu503Ter) variant. Pathogenic variants in HPS5 are known to cause a form of HPS that is characterised by albinism and dysfunction of blood platelets (leading to prolonged bleeding). The infant was referred to the paediatric haematology department where he had platelet function analysis. This revealed prolonged PFA-100 closure time following stimulation with collagen and epinephrine (>300 s, reference range 79–205 s). This finding had significant implications as the child was due to have a routine urological procedure, which was safely performed with appropriate precautions. Notably, in our cohorts, approximately 1 in 20 individuals with suspected albinism is found to have biallelic pathogenic alterations in HPS-related or CHS-related genes.5 This case is also discussed in a previous report by our group where the benefits of genetic testing over more invasive and labour-intensive haematological approaches for the diagnosis of HPS are highlighted.15
Proband 2 was noted to have nystagmus soon after birth. There were no other medical concerns and there was no family history of relevance. The diagnosis of infantile nystagmus was made and the proband was followed up in his local ophthalmology unit for a number of years. An assessment in a tertiary ophthalmic genetic clinic was initiated in middle childhood, and the vision at that point was 0.3 LogMAR (Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution) in each eye. His irides were blue and there were no transillumination defects. Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) imaging revealed foveal hypoplasia. It is noted that the broband’s hair were light brown and his skin colour was similar to that of close relatives. Genetic testing was initiated, revealing homozygosity for the TYR c.[−301C;575C>A;1205G>A] or (C;A;A) haplotype described previously. This genotype has been shown to confer a high ‘risk of albinism’ and should be considered pathogenic/predisposing.8
Proband 3 has a diagnosis of oculocutaneous albinism. Conventional genetic analysis focusing on rare variants revealed a heterozygous likely pathogenic variant in TYR c.823G>T (p.Val275Phe) [rs104894314]; this was found to be inherited from the proband’s mother (figure 2). When the common, functionally-relevant TYR c.1205G>A (p.Arg402Gln) variant was included in the analysis, the proband appeared to have a genotype similar to that of his unaffected mother. Analysis of the common promoter variant TYR c.-301C>T, as well as of TYR c.575C>A (p.Ser192Tyr), and testing of samples from other family members highlighted that the proband carried the likely pathogenic TYR c.823G>T change in trans to the c.[−301C;575C;1205G>A] haplotype (figure 2). This rare haplotype is likely to be pathogenic/predisposing,8 and the fact that it is present in trans to a likely pathogenic change confirms the genetic diagnosis of albinism.
Concluding remarks
We describe a framework for analysing genetic test results from individuals suspected of having albinism. The importance of incorporating selected common genetic variants in the analysis and the key role of haplotype phasing are highlighted.
Our work in particular clarifies the long-lasting debate about the impact of the TYR c.1205G>A (p.Arg402Gln) variant and its definition as a benign or pathogenic change.11–13 We argue that this variant can be considered to be pathogenic/predisposing in the context of specific haplotypes/genotypes, but not on its own.
In our setting, incorporating the two complex albinism-associated TYR haplotypes ([C;A;A] and [C;C;A]) in the analysis increased the diagnostic yield of genetic testing by 19%. This highlights the significant contribution of these changes to the genetic architecture of albinism.
It can be speculated that TYR c.1205G>A (p.Arg402Gln) is not the only missense TYR change whose effect can be modified by other variants. We expect that, in the future, genetic investigations for albinism will analyse key non-coding regions (including promoters and cis-regulatory elements) for all relevant genes. Notably, the concepts discussed here are likely to be relevant to the study of other rare disorders.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Ethics approval
Ethical approval was obtained from the Yorkshire and The Humber Bradford Leeds Research Ethics Committee (REC reference 15/YH/0365).
Acknowledgments
We thank Stephanie Barton (Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine), David Green (University of Manchester), Claire Hardcastle (Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine) and Tom Fitzgerald (EMBL-EBI) for the helpful discussions and insights.
References
Footnotes
GCB and BA contributed equally.
Collaborators N/A.
Contributors PIS, EB, GCB and BA conceived and designed the project; all other others contributed to the analysis and interpretation of data for the work. PIS drafted the manuscript; all other authors critically revised it. All authors provided final approval of the version to be published, and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Funding This study was supported by: the Wellcome Trust (224643/Z/21/Z and 200990/Z/16/Z), Retina UK and Fight for Sight (GR586 (RP Genome Project — UK IRDC), the French Albinism Association (Genespoir), the French National Research Agency (ANR-21-CE17-0041-01), and the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (CL-2017-06-001 and NIHR203308).
Competing interests EB is a paid consultant and equity holder of Oxford Nanopore, a paid consultant to Dovetail, and a non-executive director of Genomics England, a limited company wholly owned by the UK Department of Health and Social Care. All other authors declare no competing interests. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.