Article Text
Abstract
Background This study provides an integrated assessment of the economic and social impacts of genomic sequencing for the detection of monogenic disorders resulting in intellectual disability (ID).
Methods Multiple knowledge bases were cross-referenced and analysed to compile a reference list of monogenic disorders associated with ID. Multiple literature searches were used to quantify the health and social costs for the care of people with ID. Health and social expenditures and the current cost of whole-exome sequencing and whole-genome sequencing were quantified in relation to the more common causes of ID and their impact on lifespan.
Results On average, individuals with ID incur annual costs in terms of health costs, disability support, lost income and other social costs of US$172 000, accumulating to many millions of dollars over a lifetime.
Conclusion The diagnosis of monogenic disorders through genomic testing provides the opportunity to improve the diagnosis and management, and to reduce the costs of ID through informed reproductive decisions, reductions in unproductive diagnostic tests and increasingly targeted therapies.
- cost analysis
- intellectual disability
- monogenic disorders
- population genomic sequencing
- whole-genome sequencing
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Supplementary materials
Supplementary Data
This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.
Footnotes
Contributors Conceptualisation: BD, DS, JSM and TR; methodology: BD, DS, TG, MF and TR; formal analysis and investigation: BD, C-AE, TG and MF; writing (original draft preparation): BD; writing (review and editing): DS, C-AE, TG, JSM, MF and TR; supervision: DS, JSM and TR; overall content guarantor: BD.
Funding TR, DS, MF, TG and C-AE were supported through the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Centre for Research Excellence in Neurocognitive Disorders (grant ID 1117394).
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data availability statement All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.