Original research
Medical and neurobehavioural phenotypes in carriers of X-linked ichthyosis-associated genetic deletions in the UK Biobank
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Response to 'Female carriers'

    Dear Mr Instone - Many thanks for your interest in our work and your comment! In our analyses we did look at ICD-10 diagnoses of atrial fibrillation/flutter, and self-reported heart problems in female carriers versus female non-carriers, but didn't see any difference in prevalence between the two groups (results in the Supplementary Data). However, as these are relatively crude measures, we cannot the exclude the possibility that there are actually higher rates of subtle cardiac dysfunction in female carriers relative to non-carriers, and further, more focussed studies might look at this. Regards, Dr William Davies

    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Female carriers

    Fascinated to see the comments about irregular heartbeats as an x-linked ichthyosis suffer myself. If you are carrying out further studies I wonder if there is any trend for female carriers having the same. My mother an x-linked ichthyosis carrier has always had an extra hearth beat that causes problems for medical exams and operations. Could it be used as an additional test for expectant mums for potential x-linked babies. A great article and thanks - Jeremy Instone

    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.