You are here

Responses

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

XML
Therapeutics
Original Article
Agalsidase alfa versus agalsidase beta for the treatment of Fabry disease: an international cohort study
Compose a Response to This Article
Compose Response

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on: 16 February 2018
    Comment on Agalsidase alfa versus agalsidase beta for the treatment of Fabry disease: an international cohort study
    • Malte Lenders, scientist University Hospital Muenster
    • Other Contributors:
      • Boris Schmitz, scientist
      • Stefan-Martin Brand, medical doctor
      • Eva Brand, medical doctor

    Dear Editor,

    in their recent study Arends and colleagues demonstrate a significant 2.8-fold increased risk for the formation of neutralizing anti-drug antibodies (ADA) in male patients with Fabry disease (FD) when treated with agalsidase-beta (1.0 mg/kg every other week) compared to agalsidase-alfa (0.2 mg/kg every other week).[1] Interestingly, Rombach and colleagues and later Smid and colleagues reported no significant differences in a humoral response, when using an identical dosage of 0.2 mg/kg for both drugs. [2,3] Hence, the 5-fold higher dosage of agalsidase-beta and not the compound itself seems to be an important trigger for antibody formation. However, none of the studies determined the cross reactive immunological status, which is crucial for the risk of a humoral response. The subgroup analysis of patients with ADAs by Arends and colleagues also revealed a better biochemical response to agalsidase-beta at 1.0 mg/kg in terms of decreasing lyso-Gb3 levels.[1] The authors propose that a saturation of antibody titers due to the 5-fold higher dosage might lead to the observed effect. In this respect, we recently demonstrated that antibodies can be supersaturated and that appropriate (i.e. individually optimized) enzyme dosages can overcome ADA titers already during infusions, which may result in improved patients’ outcome.[4] However, in the same study, we also demonstrated that even in patients treated with low-dose enzyme replacement therapy ADA titers can...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    Malte Lenders received speaker honoraria from Genzyme and Shire. Eva Brand received speaker honoraria from Amicus Therapeutics, Genzyme and Shire. Stefan-Martin Brand received speaker honoraria from Shire. Boris Schmitz has nothing to declare.