Article Text

PDF

Recurrent microdeletions of 15q25.2 are associated with increased risk of congenital diaphragmatic hernia, cognitive deficits and possibly Diamond–Blackfan anaemia
  1. Margaret J Wat1,
  2. Victoria B Enciso1,
  3. Wojciech Wiszniewski1,
  4. Trevor Resnick3,
  5. Patricia Bader4,
  6. Elizabeth R Roeder5,
  7. Debra Freedenberg6,7,
  8. Chester Brown1,2,
  9. Pawel Stankiewicz1,8,
  10. Sau-Wai Cheung1,
  11. Daryl A Scott1
  1. 1Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
  2. 2Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
  3. 3Department of Neurology, Miami Children's Hospital and University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
  4. 4Northeast Indiana Genetic Counseling Center, Parkview Hospital, Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA
  5. 5Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA
  6. 6Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennesee, USA
  7. 7Department of State Health Services, Austin, Texas, USA
  8. 8Department of Medical Genetics, Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland
  1. Correspondence to Daryl A Scott, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, R813, One Baylor Plaza, BCM 227, Houston, TX 77030, USA; dscott{at}bcm.edu

Abstract

Background Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) can occur in isolation or in association with other abnormalities. We hypothesised that some cases of non-isolated CDH are caused by novel genomic disorders.

Methods and results In a cohort of >12 000 patients referred for array comparative genomic hybridisation testing, we identified three individuals—two of whom had CDH—with deletions involving a ∼2.3 Mb region on chromosome 15q25.2. Two additional patients with deletions of this region have been reported, including a fetus with CDH. Clinical data from these patients suggest that recurrent deletions of 15q25.2 are associated with an increased risk of developing CDH, cognitive deficits, cryptorchidism, short stature and possibly Diamond–Blackfan anaemia (DBA). Although no known CDH-associated genes are located on 15q25.2, four genes in this region—CPEB1, AP3B2, HOMER2 and HDGFRP3—have been implicated in CNS development/function and may contribute to the cognitive deficits seen in deletion patients. Deletions of RPS17 may also predispose individuals with 15q25.2 deletions to DBA and associated anomalies.

Conclusions Individuals with recurrent deletions of 15q25.2 are at increased risk for CDH and other birth defects. A high index of suspicion should exist for the development of cognitive defects, anaemia and DBA-associated malignancies in these individuals.

  • Congenital diaphragmatic hernia
  • microdeletion
  • 15q25.2
  • Diamond-Blackfan anaemia
  • RPS17
  • clinical genetics
  • cytogentics
  • molecular genetics
  • haematology (incl blood transfusion)
  • other respiratory medicine
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH; OMIM #142340) is a structural birth defect consisting of an opening or defect in the diaphragm that originates in utero. Major, non-hernia-related anomalies of the cardiovascular, central nervous, genitourinary and gastrointestinal systems are seen in ∼30–40% of patients with CDH.1 Array comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH) has proven to be a useful tool in identifying genomic disorders that cause non-isolated CDH (CDH+).2 In some cases, the identification of a genomic disorder in a patient with CDH+ can improve medical care by helping clinicians create individualised diagnostic, therapeutic and surveillance plans based on the patient's molecular diagnosis. Data from CDH+ patients with genomic disorders can also be used to map and identifying genes that play a critical role in the development of the diaphragm and other organ systems.2

Chromosome 15q25.2 has been predicted to be a hotspot for genomic rearrangements based on the presence of several low-copy repeats (LCRs) which can mediate non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR).3 Here, we present the clinical and molecular characteristics of three patients with 15q25.2 deletions and two patients with 15q25.2 duplications.

Materials and methods

Array comparative genomic hybridisation

We reviewed the results of a cohort of over 12 000 cases referred to the Medical Genetics Laboratories at Baylor College of Medicine (BCM) for aCGH testing. This cohort contained 20 patients whose indication for testing included CDH. Patients with 15q25.2 deletions or duplications were screened using Chromosome Microarray Analysis (CMA) versions 6.0–8.0 Oligo (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). After obtaining informed consent, high-resolution aCGH was performed on patients with 15q25.2 deletions using either a Human Genome CGH 244K Oligo Microarray Kit G4411B (Patients 1 and 3, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) or a 1M Oligo Microarray Kit G4447A (Patient 2, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) according to manufacturer's instructions. Arrays used in this study are detailed in Supplemental table 1.

Quantitative real-time PCR analysis

15q25.2 and RPS17 copy numbers were determined using quantitative real-time PCR analysis as previously described.4 Primer sequences and descriptions are provided in Supplemental table 2.

Results

Patients with 15q25.2 deletions

Microdeletions of 15q25.2 were identified in a 13-year-old boy (Patient 1) and a 1-month-old male neonate (Patient 2) with CDH+ and a 16-month-old male infant (Patient 3) without CDH. Deletions were confirmed by FISH or quantitative PCR and were not identified in available parental samples (both parents of Patients 1 and 3 and the mother of Patient 2) or in normal controls described in the Database of Genomic Variants (http://projects.tcag.ca/variation/).

A literature review revealed two additional patients with similar 15q25 microdeletions; a fetus with CDH and mild hydrocephalus described by Mefford et al and an 11-year-old girl with mild mental/psychomotor retardation described by Wagenstaller et al5 6 The latter patient developed a severe hypoproliferative macrocytic anaemia which started at 1 year of age and required blood transfusions until age four, prompting physicians to consider a diagnosis of Diamond–Blackfan anaemia (DBA, OMIM #105650).

Additional clinical features and the molecular breakpoints of all five 15q25.2 deletions patients are summarised in table 1 and depicted in figure 1. Some features—particularly the short stature and cognitive defects seen in Patient 1—may represent the long-term effects of CDH or a combination of these secondary effects and genetic factors.

Table 1

Clinical features and molecular breakpoints of patients with 15q25.2 microdeletions

Figure 1

Deletions and duplications of chromosome 15q25. The 15q25 region based on hg19 is pictured. The minimum deleted (green) and duplicated (red) regions for each patient are shown in solid bars with the maximal deleted and duplicated regions shown in stripes. Deletions reported by Mefford et al,5 Wagenstaller et al,6 and Itsara et al7 are also represented. Genes responsible for the features associated with 15q25.2 deletions are likely to be contained within a region delineated by dark vertical lines which is based on the maximal deletions of patient described by Wagenstaller et al (centromeric) and Patient 1 (telomeric). Genes located in this region are represented by black arrows (single copy genes) and grey arrows (genes present in more than one copy) while those outside this region are shown as outlines. Low-copy repeats LCR 15q25.2A-D are depicted in orange. Pairs of large, directly oriented stretches of DNA with >98% sequence identity which could mediate non-allelic homologous recombination between LCR clusters are shown at the bottom of the figure as block arrows connected by grey bars.

Structural birth defects seen in more than one deletion patient include CDH in three patients (60%), cryptorchidism in two out of three males (66%) and cardiovascular anomalies in two patients (40%)—multiple VSDs in Patient 2 and a coronary artery fistula in Patient 3. Short stature was also documented in three out of five patients (60%) with Patient 1's height being at the 1st percentile and Patient 3's length at the 5th percentile.

Although Patient 1's early development was reported to be within the normal range, significant cognitive delays were noted on standardised tests starting at age five (Supplemental table 3). At 6 years of age he developed throat clearing/vocal tics and, over time, neuropsychiatric evaluations prompted a number of diagnoses including mental retardation, autistic disorder, Asperger's disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, generalised anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder and sensory integration dysfunction. Patient 2 remains hospitalised and is too young to be thoroughly evaluated, but a head ultrasound revealed a small corpus callosum and underdeveloped gyri.

Patients with 15q25.2 duplications

Two cases involving reciprocal duplication of the 15q25.2 region were identified in our cohort (Patients 4 and 5; figure 1; Supplemental table 4). Patient 4 was referred for hypertension, obesity and developmental delay and was found to also have an interstitial deletion of chromosome 22q11.2 consistent with a diagnosis of velocardiofacial/DiGeorge syndrome (OMIM #192430, #188400). Patient 5 was referred for aCGH analysis for an atrial septal defect, cataracts (maternally inherited), blue sclerae, short neck with redundant skin, a shawl scrotum and joint hypermobility. His 15q25 duplication was found to have been inherited from his asymptomatic father. No similar duplications have been reported in the Database of Genomic Variants.

Analysis of low-copy repeats

A detailed analysis of the 15q25 region revealed four major LCRs (LCR 15q25.2A-D) that share large (∼42 to 200 kb) directly oriented stretches of DNA with greater than 98% sequence identity (figure 1). These findings suggest that genomic alterations identified in our patients were mediated by NAHR.3

RPS17 copy number in 15q25.2 deletion patients

Mutations in RPS17–which is present in two copies on 15q25.2 (figure 1)—have been implicated in the development of DBA.8 9 To determine if reductions in RPS17 copy number may have contributed to the phenotype of our deletion patients, we performed quantitative real-time PCR for RPS17. Patients 1–3 were found to have a 50% reduction in RPS17 copy number when compared with normal Caucasian and Hispanic controls (Supplemental figure 2). This result suggests that the deletion in Patients 1–3 may have resulted from a recombination event between LCR 15q25.2A and LCR 15q25.2C causing both copies of RPS17 to be deleted on the affected chromosome.

Discussion

Phenotypes associated with 15q25.2 deletions and duplications

Clinical geneticists are often called upon to provide prognostic information to families and to counsel with other physicians regarding patient care plans based on molecular data obtained by aCGH analyses. Clinical data from Patients 1–3 and two previously described individuals with 15q25.2 deletions suggest that this genomic disorder places individuals at increased risk of developing CDH, cognitive deficits, cryptorchidism, short stature and possibly Diamond–Blackfan anaemia. These features are most likely caused by disruption of one or more genes located between LCR 15q25.2A and LCR 15q25.2C (figure 1; Supplemental table 5).

While deletions of this region may predispose individuals to the development of neuropsychiatric problems—as seen in Patient 1—the risk is likely higher for individuals with deletions that also include the region between LCR 15q25.2C and LCR 15q25.2D—including Patients 2 and 3—since deletions of this adjacent region have been identified in two patients with autism and two patients with schizophrenia (figure 1).7

Although reciprocal duplications of 15q25 were identified in two patients, one carried a 22q11.2 deletion—which, alone, could account for his developmental delay—and the second inherited his duplication from his unaffected father. This suggests that if 15q25 duplications have an associated phenotype, it is likely to be either subclinical or incompletely penetrant.

The CDH minimal deleted region on chromosome 15q25.2

The CDH minimal deleted region on 15q25.2 is defined by the maximal deletion of Patient 1. Since the diaphragm is a muscular organ, it is possible that disruption of the BTB (POZ) domain containing 1 (BTBD1) gene, which is essential for myoblast growth and differentiation in vitro, could play a role in development of CDH.10 However, studies in rodent models suggest that some types of CDH arise from defects in the non-muscular mesenchymal substratum onto which myogenic cells and axons destined to form the neuromuscular component of the diaphragm expand.11 Further studies have shown that development of posterolateral CDH can be associated with decreased cell proliferation leading to abnormal development of the pleuroperitonaeal fold—a triangular-shaped embryonic structure which represents the primordial diaphragm.12 This suggests that 15q25.2 genes known to affect cell proliferation—such as hepatoma-derived growth factor, related protein 3 (HDGFRP3) and basonuclin 1 (BNC1; OMIM #601930)—may play a role in CDH development.13 14

Cognitive defects and associated candidate genes

Several genes located on 15q25.2 may contribute to the cognitive delays seen in 15q25.2 deletions. Cytoplasmic polyadenylation element-binding protein 1 (CPEB1; OMIM #607342) has been found at postsynaptic sites of hippocampal neurons and Cpeb1−/− mice have abnormal long-term potentiation and long-term depression and show an impaired ability to extinguish hippocampal-dependent memories.15 16 Adaptor-related protein complex 3, β-2 subunit (AP3B2; OMIM #602166) is part of a neuron-specific heterotetrameric vesicle-coat protein complex which is thought to play an important role in neurotransmitter release.17 However, it is unlikely that deletion of either of these genes is solely responsible for the cognitive deficits seen in 15q25 deletion patients since at least one loss of AP3B2 and at least six losses of CPEB1 have been reported among normal controls in the Database of Genomic Variants (Supplemental table 6).

In contrast, deletions of the homologue of Drosophila homer 2 gene (HOMER2; OMIM #604799) and the hepatoma-derived growth factor, related protein 3 gene (HDGFRP3) have not been described in normal controls. HOMER2 is a scaffolding protein that plays an important role in maintaining plasticity at glutamatergic synapses. Studies of Homer2−/− mice revealed an important role for this protein in modulating responses to addictive substances including alcohol and cocaine.18 HDGFRP3 is strongly expressed in the developing nervous system and has recently been shown to modulate the neuronal cytoskeleton and to be necessary for proper neurite outgrowth in primary cortical neurons.19

Deletions of RPS17 and Diamond–Blackfan anaemia

The ribosomal protein S17 gene (RPS17, OMIM #180472) is present in two copies on 15q25.2 and most individuals are expected to carry four alleles. De novo RPS17 mutations have been described in two patients with DBA: an otherwise healthy 4-month-old male with a 2-bp deletion (200delGA) in exon 3 of RPS17—causing a frame shift and premature termination at codon 86—and a 31-year-old man with severe anaemia, a flat thenar eminence, facial dysmorphisms and short stature (<3rd percentile) with single base pair substitution affecting the translation initiation start codon of RPS17.8 9 These mutations would argue that loss of a single copy of RPS17 can cause DBA. However, deletions of one copy of RPS17 have also been reported in at least seven normal control individuals in the Database of Genomic Variants (Supplemental table 6). Possible explanations for these seemingly contradictory observations include: (1) the de novo RPS17 mutations may result in gain of function/dominant negative alleles, (2) the DBA patients with de novo RPS17 mutations may also have undetected sequence changes/deletions affecting other copies of RPS17 or other DBA-related genes, or (3) DBA caused by abnormalities in RPS17 may shows incomplete penetrance with the risk of developing DBA being directly related to the number of RPS17 alleles affected.

When considering whether a 50% reduction in RPS17 copy number may have adversely affected Patients 1–3, it is important to note that the clinical spectrum of DBA can include individuals without anaemia who have DBA-associated congenital anomalies that commonly affect the head, facial features, eyes, palate, upper limbs/hands/thumbs, heart and the urogenital system.20 Although causality can not clearly be established, it is possible that changes in RPS17 copy number may have played a role in the development of the short neck and VSDs seen in Patient 2 and the cleft palate, low-set ears, short neck and hypoplastic thenar eminence seen in Patient 3. The presence of these features suggests that a high index of suspicion should exist for the development of anaemia and DBA-associated malignancies in patients with 15q25.2 deletions.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the families who participated in this study. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health grants KO8HD-050583 (to D.A.S.) and 3T32GM007330-33S1 (to M.J.W.) and grant R13-0005-04/2008 (to P.S.) from the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education.

References

View Abstract

Supplementary materials

Footnotes

  • Funding NIH; Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the Baylor College of Medicine Institutional Review Board (IRB), Houston, TX 77030, USA.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.