Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
During mammalian tooth formation, two proteinases are secreted by ameloblasts: enamelysin (MMP-20) and kallikrein-4 (KLK4). Enamelysin is the early protease. It is expressed by ameloblasts throughout the secretory stage and part of the maturation stage.1–3 KLK4 is the late protease; its expression by ameloblasts begins in the transition stage and continues throughout enamel maturation.4,5 Expression of these two proteases overlaps during the transition and early maturation stages, when the bulk of the organic matrix component is removed from the enamel layer. Because of its early pattern of expression, its ability to generate the same pattern of amelogenin cleavages in vitro as those observed in vivo,6 and the nature of the dental phenotype in enamelysin knockout mice,7 MMP-20 cleavages are thought to play important roles in crystal elongation, proper formation of the dentino–enamel junction (DEJ), and in the maintenance of enamel rod organisation. The extracellular protein KLK4 is believed to be the predominant degradative enzyme that clears enamel proteins from the matrix during the maturation stage.8,9,10 There are a number of recent reviews in the literature on the roles of proteolytic enzymes in dental enamel formation.11–14
Enamelysin is a matrix metalloproteinase (MMP). In humans, enamelysin is expressed from a gene on chromosome 11q22.3-q23 having 10 exons (all coding).15 The enamelysin protein has 483 amino acids, including the signal peptide, and folds into propeptide, catalytic, linker, and hemopexin domains.16 The active protease migrates as a doublet at 46 and 41 kDa on zymograms.17,18 Its only post-translational modification is a disulphide bridge connecting the first and last amino acids of the hemopexin domain.19
Inherited enamel malformations show a variety of phenotypes that are grouped according to the thickness and hardness of the enamel layer and are described as hypoplastic, hypocalcified, or hypomaturation types of amelogenesis imperfecta (AI).20 AI can have an autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, or an X linked pattern of Mendelian inheritance. The enamelysin null mouse provides some indication of which type of AI would result from a mutation in the MMP20 gene. The MMP20 null mouse (−/−) displays multiple enamel defects, including disorganised enamel rods, enamel hypoplasia (thin enamel), and a tendency for the enamel to delaminate from the underlying dentine. The enamel layer retains more residual protein than in the wild type mouse, and has reduced microhardness.
To gain a better understanding of the role of MMP-20 in normal and defective enamel formation, we developed and used a strategy for mutational analyses of the human MMP20 gene and have identified the first MMP20 gene mutation in a family with amelogenesis imperfecta. We describe the enamel phenotype and discuss the potential effects of the MMP20 mutation on enamelysin expression.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The proband first presented at 6 years of age at the Pediatric Dentistry Clinic at the University of Michigan (fig 1). The dental phenotype resembled the autosomal recessive pigmented hypomaturation type of amelogenesis imperfecta.21 The teeth appeared normal in size, with some crowding. The enamel layer was pigmented, showing an agar brown discoloration. The surface of the enamel was mottled and rough, but hard and brittle. Chunks of enamel had fractured away from several teeth, most notably on the lingual of the maxillary right canine (no. 6), and the buccals of the mandibular left canine (no. 22), and right first bicuspid (no. 28). Radiographically, the enamel layer was usually more opaque than the underlying dentine, but not in all areas, and was never as radiopaque as normal enamel. The proband had an anterior open bite. His teeth were generally not sensitive, except in response to extremes in temperature. Composites were placed, but required periodic repairs as the enamel at the restoration margins tended to chip off from the teeth. The father of the proband was reported to be affected; he is currently edentulous and wears maxillary and mandibular complete dentures.
We identified a homozygous mutation in the gene encoding MMP-20 (enamelysin) in two affected members of a family with autosomal recessive pigmented hypomaturation amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) (MIM 204700). This is the first reported mutation in the MMP-20 gene that causes disease.
The identified mutation was in the intron 6 splice acceptor (AG→TG).
The enamel of the subjects’ teeth was pigmented, and its surface was mottled and rough. Radiographically, the enamel layer was usually more opaque than the underlying dentine, but not in all areas, and was never as radio-opaque as normal enamel.
We present a standardised nomenclature for reporting MMP20 mutations that designates this mutation as g.30 561A→T, c.954-2A→T, or IVS6-2A→T.
Identification of kindred and enrolment of human subjects
The study protocol and patient consents were reviewed and approved by the institutional review board at the University of Michigan. The kindred was identified when the proband presented to the pediatric dental clinic at the university for the restoration of chipped teeth and correction of an anterior open bite. Family members received a complete dental and oral examination, including panographic radiographs. Oral histories were obtained from the grandmother and uncle by telephone interview.
Polymerase chain reaction
From participating family members, 10 ml of peripheral whole blood was obtained. Genomic DNA was isolated using the QIAamp DNA blood maxi kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA). Oligonucleotide primers for polymerase chain reaction are shown in table 1. The reactions had a 5 minute denaturation at 94°C, followed by 40–50 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 seconds, primer annealing at the relevant temperature (table 1) for 30 seconds, and product extension at 72°C for 30 seconds, with a final extension at 72°C for 7 minutes. PCR amplification products were purified by the QIAquick PCR Purification kit and protocol (Qiagen Inc.).
MMP20 alleles were amplified using 200 random DNA samples taken from the general population and 50 samples from white subjects in the human variation panel of the Coriell Cell Repository (Camden, NJ, USA).
Primers were designed to amplify five intronic regions of the MMP20 gene known to contain 17 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (table 2). PCR was performed in a total volume of 25 μl containing 1 μmol/l each forward and reverse primers, 1× PCR buffer, 1.5 mmol/l MgCl2, 200 μmol/l dNTPs, 200 ng DNA, and 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase. Amplification conditions were an initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 minutes, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 seconds, annealing at 58°C for 30 seconds, and extension at 68°C for 2 minutes, with a final extension at 68°C for 10 minutes. Following amplification, PCR products were gel purified and sequenced using the ABI Big Dye terminator kit and an ABI 3100 automated DNA sequencer. All products were sequenced from both directions to minimise sequencing artefacts. Haplotypes were generated based upon allele transmission.
Mutational analyses were performed for the coding exons and intron–exon boundaries for five candidate genes (enamelin, ameloblastin, tuftelin, enamelysin, and kallikrein 4) believed to be critical for enamel development. The only gene found to differ from the wild type reference sequences was MMP20; the proband and his father were both homozygous for the same mutation (fig 2B). Clinical and pedigree analysis suggested a dominant pattern of inheritance of AI in this family; however, mutational analyses of the MMP20 gene was consistent with pseudodominance. Heterozygous carriers of the MMP20 mutation (I-2 and II-8) did not show clinical findings consistent with AI, while individuals homozygous for the MMP20 mutation (II-7 and III-11) demonstrated AI clinically and by history (fig 3). Similar findings have been reported for autosomal recessive AI caused by mutation of the ENAM gene.22 Current nomenclature recommendations for reporting sequence variations suggest using genomic and cDNA reference sequence.23–25 We used the MMP20 cDNA sequence for human MMP20 (NM_004771.2) and the human MMP20 gene sequence from human genome project chromosome 11 contig (NT_033899.6) as reference sequences. At the DNA level, the sequence variation that was present on both MMP20 alleles in the two affected members of our AI kindred is designated g.30 561A→T, c.954-2A→T or IVS6-2A→T. Sequence analysis did not reveal the g.30 561A→T mutation in any of the 200 random controls (400 alleles) nor the 100 alleles for the white human variation panel.
As this family was not known to be consanguineous, the finding of homozygosity in two individuals raises the possibility of a mutational hotspot or of inheritance of a common allele identical by descent. To answer this question, we haplotyped individuals for 18 SNPs by direct sequencing (fig 3). The haplotype analysis demonstrates that II-5 and II-7 have inherited different parental haplotypes and are homozygous for all SNPs. Based upon previous haplotyping of white individuals, four predominant haplotypes were identified (data not shown). Three of these haplotypes (A, C, and D) were found to segregate within this nuclear family. I-2 has haplotype AD. Her unaffected son, II-5, is homozygous for the A haplotype, while her affected son, II-7, and grandson, III-11, are homozygous for the D haplotype. As expected, the mother of the proband, II-8, was found to be a carrier of the mutation. In addition, her haplotype (D) associated with the mutation is identical to that of her affected husband. Her other allele is haplotype C. Thus, the mutation has arisen on the D haplotype. These results would argue against a mutational hotspot and for inheritance of the mutant alleles identical by descent.
This is the first report of a mutation in the matrix metalloproteinase-20 (MMP20) gene. The gene is only known to be expressed in developing tooth enamel, and is also known as enamelysin (OMIM #604629). The mutation destroys the splice acceptor sequence at the 3′ end of intron 6 (AG→TG). Intron 6 is a large intron (11 777 bp) that separates exons encoding the hemopexin domain (fig 2). The hemopexin domain is not critical for catalytic activity, but is highly conserved among the derived MMP-20 amino acid sequences from pig,2 mouse,26 cattle,27 and human.28 The function of the enamelysin hemopexin domain is not known, but studies of other matrix metalloproteinases indicate that the enamelysin C terminal domain (CTD) might be essential for defining substrate specificity, binding to tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs), and could be required for activation of proMMP-20 at the cell surface.29 Additionally, hemopexin domains may be functionally important in localising the protein substrate or binding to facilitate cleavage.
Because enamelysin gene expression is restricted to developing teeth, it was not possible to determine experimentally the effect of this mutation on MMP-20 mRNA transcripts, but it is clear that the IVS6-2A→T mutation would preclude the specific removal of intron 6 by the splicing machinery.30 Two defective splicing outcomes seem to be most probable, both of which would introduce an upstream translation termination codon in the mRNA transcript, causing it to be degraded by the nonsense mediated decay (NMD) system.31–33 In the first splicing outcome, the retention of intron 6 in the mRNA would generate a large mRNA (over 13 000 nucleotides in length) with translation terminating in the first complete codon of the retained intron (p.I319X). In the second splicing scenario, exon 7 would not be recognised as an exon by the splicing machinery and the intron 6–exon 7–intron 7 segment would be deleted as a single intron, as has been shown to occur in other splice acceptor site mutations.34 Skipping exon 7 would shift the reading frame after R318 and introduce 19 extraneous amino acids before terminating translation (p.I319fs338X). It seems likely that few of the defective MMP-20 mRNA transcripts would survive to be translated into protein during odontogenesis. If any proteins were synthesised, they would consist of native MMP-20 up to Arg318 and/or MMP-20 up to Arg318 plus a non-functional, if not toxic, extension of 19 amino acids. A summary of the likely effect of the g.30 561A→T mutation on the MMP-20 protein is shown in fig 2C.
The principal functional deficits predicted from the g.30 561A→T mutation would be caused by (a) the reduction of MMP-20 activity caused by degradation of its mRNA, and (b) through the loss of a functional hemopexin domain. The major consequence of diminished MMP-20 activity would be a failure to process and turn over enamel proteins during the secretory stage of amelogenesis and potentially a failure to activate KLK4 zymogen early in the maturation stage.
Proteolytic processing is believed to be essential for proper enamel crystal elongation, which determines the thickness of the enamel layer as a whole. Enamel hypoplasia (abnormally thin enamel), is a major feature of the defective enamel deposited by the enamelysin knockout mouse.7 In contrast to the enamelysin knockout, the teeth of our proband were heavily pigmented and not exceptionally thin (hypoplastic), suggesting a problem with the removal of enamel proteins, which normally occurs during the early maturation stage of enamel development.8 We speculate that in humans, the processing and turnover of enamel matrix proteins during the secretory stage is necessary for the ultimate clearance of the organic matrix during enamel maturation.
Autosomal recessive pigmented hypomaturation AI has recently been shown to have mutations in KLK4.35 A comparison of the dental phenotypes of the KLK4 and MMP20 probands shows that they share many similar features. The enamel crowns are normal in size and shape, have a rougher, duller, less reflective surface than normal enamel, appear to be more brittle in that they show a tendency to fracture or chip, but do not appear to be particularly susceptible to dental caries. The radiodensity of the defective enamel is generally less than that of normal enamel, but can still be distinguished from the underlying dentine on radiographs. The coloration of the teeth is different, but extrinsic staining since tooth eruption could have contributed to the current appearance. The KLK4 teeth have a more homogenous dark yellow hue, while the MMP20 teeth have an irregular greyish brown discoloration and are a little more glossy. Overall, the dental phenotypes in the KLK4 and MMP20 probands are remarkably similar.
To date, mutations in four genes (AMELX, ENAM, KLK4, and MMP20) have been found to cause amelogenesis imperfecta. Of these, three (ENAM, KLK4, and MMP20) can cause ARAI.36,37 While the recessive mutation in ENAM causes hypoplastic AI,22 mutations in the proteases cause hypomaturation ARAI. As mutational analyses clarify the genetic bases of the various AI phenotypes, a standardised nomenclature system can be developed. In turn, this system will enable clinicians to better predict which candidate gene might be defective, given the dental phenotype in their patients, and this knowledge will be useful when considering treatment alternatives, such as whether or not to attempt enamel bonding.
We thank the family for their participation, and the Pediatric Dental Clinic at the University of Michigan for their cooperation. This investigation was supported in part by the Foundation of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, and USPHS Research Grants DE12769, DE15846, and DE11301 from the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 29892, USA.
Competing interests: there are no competing interests