Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is the most common genetic susceptibility syndrome for colorectal cancer. HNPCC is most frequently caused by germline mutations in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes MSH2 andMLH1. Recently, mutations in another MMR gene, MSH6 (also known asGTBP), have also been shown to result in HNPCC. Preliminary data indicate that the phenotype related toMSH6 mutations may differ from the classical HNPCC caused by defects in MSH2 andMLH1.
Here, we describe an extended Dutch HNPCC family not fulfilling the Amsterdam criteria II and resulting from aMSH6 mutation. Overall, the penetrance of colorectal cancer appears to be significantly decreased (p<0.001) among the MSH6 mutation carriers in this family when compared with MSH2 andMLH1 carriers (32% by the age of 80v >80%).
Endometrial cancer is a frequent manifestation among female carriers (six out of 13 malignant tumours). Transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract is also relatively common in both male and female carriers (10% of the carriers).
Moreover, the mean age of onset of both colorectal cancer (MSH6 v MSH2/MLH1 = 55 yearsv 44/41 years) and endometrial carcinomas (MSH6 v MSH2/MLH1 = 55 yearsv 49/48 years) is delayed. As previously reported, we confirm that the pattern of microsatellite instability, in combination with immunohistochemical analysis, can predict the presence of a MSH6 germline defect.
The detailed characterisation of the clinical phenotype of this kindred contributes to the establishment of genotype-phenotype correlations in HNPCC owing to mutations in specific mismatch repair genes.
- hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is one of the most common autosomal dominant conditions predisposing to cancer. HNPCC carriers are at risk for the development of a broad spectrum of malignancies including tumours of the colon, endometrium, stomach, small intestine, hepatobiliary system, ureter, renal pelvis, and ovary.1 HNPCC is caused by germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes, predominantlyMSH2 on chromosome 2p162 andMLH1 on chromosome 3p21.3 In a minority of cases, mutations have been described in other MMR genes like PMS1 andPMS2.4 Recently, germline mutations in the MSH6 gene on chromosome 2p15 were recognised as a frequent cause of atypical HNPCC, that is, not complying with the clinical “Amsterdam criteria”.5-9
The involvement of MMR genes in HNPCC is reflected by the occurrence of instability of simple repetitive DNA sequences (microsatellite instability or MSI) in tumours from HNPCC patients. Accordingly, more than 90% of the colorectal tumours and at least 75% of the endometrial tumours from HNPCC patients display MSI.10-12In sporadic colorectal and endometrial cancer, MSI is found in about 15-30% of tumours.13 14
The first reports on MSH6 germline mutations have indicated that the clinical phenotype of the affected families may differ from the “classical” HNPCC caused byMSH2 and MLH1mutations.5-9 The penetrance of colorectal cancer seemed to be reduced. However, endometrial cancer was likely to represent a more important clinical manifestation among femaleMSH6 carriers. The reported mean age of onset of colorectal and endometrial cancer appeared to be delayed in families with MSH6 germline mutations, 50 years and older compared to 44 (MSH2) and 41 (MLH1) years of age15 and 53 years and older compared to 49 (MSH2) and 48 (MLH1) years, respectively.7Notably, MSI analysis of tumours from MSH6mutation carriers suggested a reduced penetrance of the MSI-H phenotype and preferential instability at mononucleotide repeats.7-9 12
Here, we report the clinical and molecular characterisation of a large HNPCC kindred resulting from a frameshift mutation in theMSH6 gene.
The proband, a 50 year old female, was referred to the Department of Clinical Genetics, Rotterdam by her gynaecologist in 1993. At that time, three of her six sisters were diagnosed with endometrial cancer at 50, 57, and 60 years of age. A fourth sister had developed ovarian cancer (endometroid adenocarcinoma) at the age of 50. The proband's father died at the age of 85 without any symptoms of HNPCC. Her mother underwent a hysterectomy for leiomyomata at 55 and was in good health at 92 years of age.
The differential diagnosis in this family included HNPCC. Mutation analysis of the MLH1 andMSH2 genes by PCR and DGGE in one of the affected sisters of the proband did not show any pathogenic mutation. In the meantime, the proband developed endometrial cancer at the age of 53, the fourth case of endometrial cancer in this sibship.
As soon as MSH6 mutation analysis became available, mutation screening was performed and a frameshift mutation (del T codon 594) in exon 4 was identified.7 The proband, her affected sisters, and mother were found to carry the same mutation.
At the request of the proband, family members were informed about the findings and were invited to contact the Department of Clinical Genetics for additional information and/or to be tested for the presence of the mutation.
We were also able to link the family to another kindred under investigation at the Department of Clinical Genetics at the Leiden University Medical Centre.
In total, DNA testing for the MSH6mutation was performed in 80 out of 132 living relatives with at least a 25% risk of being carrier of the MSH6mutation (fig 1), 27 males (out of 63, 43%) and 53 females (out of 69, 77%). Out of these 132 relatives, 11 were previously diagnosed with an HNPCC related tumour and all of them were tested. Two tested unaffected relatives were obligate carriers. Out of 75 carriers at 50% risk and 44 at 25% risk, 46 (61%) and 21 (48%) were tested, respectively (tables 1 and2).
Ten of the 11 affected subjects were carriers of the familialMSH6 mutation. The patient (IV.6) negative for the mutation was a 55 year old male, diagnosed with numerous tubulovillous adenomas at the age of 53. Since his clinical presentation was suggestive of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), though with a delayed age of onset, mutation analysis of theAPC gene was performed. This did not show any alteration.
The MSH6 mutation was confirmed in both unaffected obligate carriers.
Out of the 46 tested healthy subjects with a 50% risk for the mutation, 17 (37%) were found to carry the MSH6mutation; none of those with a 25% risk tested positive (table2).
All 17 unaffected mutation carriers above the age of 25 years (five males and 12 females) were offered the generally accepted surveillance for HNPCC, namely colonoscopy every one to two years, yearly gynaecological examination with vaginal ultrasound and CA125 blood testing (for female carriers), and yearly urine sediment testing and cytology. During the first screening the following diagnoses were made: a tubulovillous adenoma with dysplasia in the proximal rectum of a 60 year old male; an invasive ductal adenocarcinoma of the breast and an adenocarcinoma of the colon in a 49 year old female; a small tubular adenoma and endometrial hyperplasia in a 50 year old female; and an adenoma in a female aged 48. Of the remaining 13 carriers, four were under the age of 45 and four were above 70 years without any symptoms of the genetic predisposition. However, a 92 year old female underwent a hysterectomy because of leiomyomata of the uterus at the age of 55.
The family included five dead obligate mutation carriers, three females and two males. Three of them had been diagnosed with a HNPCC related tumour (table 1). One male reached the age of 83 without having developed any HNPCC related tumour.
We were not able to determine the MSH6status of five cancer patients in this family: one colorectal cancer (onset >70) in a female patient (III.13) whose 13 descendants tested negative for the mutation; one male with an astrocytoma (III.19) at the age of 75, three of whose four children did not carry the mutation; two breast cancer patients (IV.14, IV.20, onset >50); and one patient with cancer of unknown origin around the age of 40 (III.6).
In total, 34 mutation carriers (29 alive and five dead) were identified in this pedigree, 17 of whom developed a (pre)malignant tumour (table1). Of the carriers with a malignancy, four had two primary HNPCC related tumours. Using the Kaplan-Meyer method, 7% of the carriers developed colorectal cancer by the age of 50 years and 32% by the age of 80 years (mean age of onset 55 years, ranging from 32 to 83 years). Of the female carriers, 52% developed endometrial cancer by the age of 80 and all of them were diagnosed above the age of 50 years. Three carriers had a papillary transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract (10% of the carriers).
Microsatellite instability (MSI) and immunohistochemical (IHC) analyses
We performed MSI analysis and/or immunohistochemistry with antibodies against MLH1, MSH2, and MSH612 on tumour samples derived from 12 subjects; in four cases, two independent tumour samples were tested (table 3).
Using the markers recommended by Boland et al,16 MSI analysis showed variable patterns (table3). However, all tumour samples derived from theMSH6 carriers displayed instability of at least one mononucleotide marker when an extended set of markers, including BAT40, was used.
Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of the MSH6 protein in tumour sections showed no expression in any of the samples tested, with the exception of III.13 and IV.6. Patient III.13 could not be tested for either the presence of the germline mutation or for MSI, and is likely to represent a phenocopy, in view of the late age of onset (colon carcinoma at >70 years) and the failure to detect theMSH6 mutation in her 13 descendants. We were able to perform MSI analysis in a single adenoma from patient IV.6 that did not display instability for any of the tested markers. MLH1 and MSH2 IHC analysis was positive in all samples with the exception of the rectal carcinoma from IV.13, negative for MSH2.
Genetic heterogeneity and variable phenotypic expression represent major complications in the diagnosis and clinical management of HNPCC, one of the most common inherited predispositions to multiorgan tumorigenesis. Although the hallmark of this condition is represented by colorectal lesions, a broad range of cancer types, including tumours of the endometrium, stomach, small intestine, hepatobiliary system, and ureter, are established clinical expressions of HNPCC. The vast majority of HNPCC cases are known to result from germline mutations in the DNA mismatch repair genes MSH2 andMLH1.17 In these kindreds, high penetrance and early onset of colorectal and endometrial cancer are the major clinical features. The set of diagnostic criteria, Amsterdam criteria I and II, established by the International Collaborative Group on HNPCC18 19 well serve the purpose of selecting families with a high likelihood of carryingMSH2 and MLH1mutations.17 More recently, atypical HNPCC families, that is, not complying with the Amsterdam criteria (ACI and II) though clearly suggestive of a HNPCC-like inherited condition, have been reported to be caused by germline mutations in a third MMR gene, namelyMSH6.7-9 Preliminary phenotypic analysis of these families showed a reduced occurrence of colorectal cancer and a prevalence of endometrial tumours.
Here, we have presented a detailed analysis of an extended Dutch HNPCC pedigree resulting from an inactivating germline mutation of theMSH6 gene.
The expression of the MSH6 mutation in this family suggests a reduced penetrance and a delayed age of onset for colorectal cancer. Using the Kaplan-Meyer method, 7% of the carriers developed colorectal cancer by the age of 50 years and 32% by the age of 80 years. This is significantly reduced (p<0.001) compared to “classical” HNPCC caused by MSH2 andMLH1 (∼55% by age 50 and >80% by age 80).15 Admittedly, these calculations are based on a limited number of cases and may represent an overestimate because not all healthy eligible relatives were tested for theMSH6 mutation. Moreover, the selection bias introduced when studying a family with such a striking clinical history may also lead to an overestimation of the penetrance. The mean age of onset of the colorectal carcinomas in this family is 55 years. This is delayed when compared with HNPCC families caused byMSH2 (44 years) and MLH1(41 years) mutations.15 This delayed age of onset may also bias the estimated penetrance. Notably, the youngest diagnosed case was at 32 years, implying that periodic screening recommendations should not differ from those established for classical HNPCC until more data are available.
In this family, endometrial cancer is the most common tumour type (six out of 13 malignant tumours) among female carriers. All the endometrial cancers were diagnosed above the age of 50 and their mean age of onset was 55 years, that is, five to 10 years later when compared with “classical” HNPCC caused by mutations inMLH1 andMSH2.7 20
Another striking clinical phenotype in this family is the papillary transitional cell carcinoma of the ureter and renal pelvis observed in three relatives (10% of the carriers). Notably, the lifetime cumulative risk of this tumour type in MLH1or MSH2 mutation carriers is only 2.6%.21
As previously reported by us and others,7-9 the MSI phenotype caused by loss of MSH6 function is reduced when compared with MLH1 andMSH2, and differs in its predominance at mononucleotide runs. This is in agreement with previous studies on yeast and mouse model systems.22 23 From this point of view, the set of markers previously recommended by NCI for MSI analysis16 may not be suitable forMSH6 mutation carriers and should be complemented with a set of mononucleotide markers. In six of the cases reported here (III.4, IV.4U, IV.13E, IV.15C, IV.27, and IV.32) (table3), instability was observed at only one or two mononucleotide repeats (one of which was not included in the NCI panel) leading to an MSI-low or stable classification. In five of these cases, IHC was performed and indicated the loss of MSH6 in the tumour. Therefore, we recommend IHC analysis in MSI-L and MSS tumours from cases with a family history suggestive of HNPCC.12
We also show the feasibility of the IHC approach not only on colorectal tumours but also in carcinoma of the endometrium, urinary tract, and breast. The latter finding is relevant for the inclusion of breast cancer in the HNPCC tumour spectrum: breast tumour samples from IV.15 showed both MSI-high and a negative IHC staining pattern in accordance with the presence of the MSH6 germline mutation in this person. Two additional perimenopausal breast cancer cases were found in the present study (IV.14 and IV.20). However, as no material was available from these patients, we could not establish their MSH6 mutation carrier status.
IHC analysis was also helpful in the assessment of the likely phenocopy status relative to III.13. As a limited amount of a colorectal carcinoma was available from this dead patient, we limited our analysis to IHC and found normal MSH6 protein expression. Moreover, all her descendants tested negative for the mutation. Another dead patient from this family, III.19, was diagnosed with astrocytoma at the age of 75. Again, no archival material was available from this patient. However, the delayed age of onset and the fact that three of his children tested negative for the mutation, do not allow us to draw any conclusion on the relationship between the presence of the brain tumour and theMSH6 defect.
Patient IV.6 presented with a clinical phenotype more suggestive of attenuated polyposis24 rather than HNPCC. Accordingly, MSI analysis of the colonic polyps was negative (MSS) and normal MSH6 expression was found by IHC. Failure to detect theMSH6 mutation in this patient confirmed that the attenuated polyposis is likely to result from an unlinked genetic predisposition.
In conclusion, the clinical features associated withMSH6 germline mutations strongly support the inclusion of endometrial cancer and transitional cell cancer of the ureter and renal pelvis in the diagnostic criteria for HNPCC in the new Amsterdam Criteria (ACII) as formulated by the ICG-HNPCC.19 In addition, we propose to perform MSI in combination with IHC in all Amsterdam negative families with a clustering of endometrial or urinary tract cancers. The combined MSI and IHC analysis will direct subsequent mutation analysis forMSH6.
We thank Dr J J P M Pieters, gynaecologist, for referring the family to the Department of Clinical Genetics, Rotterdam.