Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Clinical phenotypes and molecular characterisation of three patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VII

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Editor—The Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) is a diverse group of heritable connective tissue disorders whose primary clinical features include soft, hyperextensible skin, dystrophic scarring, easy bruising, and joint hypermobility.1 An initial classification defined 10 distinct types of EDS,1but with recent advances in our understanding of the molecular pathology a revised nosology with six types has been proposed.2 In the original classification, EDS type VII, a subgroup characterised by extreme joint laxity, was divided into three subtypes, EDS VIIA, VIIB, and VIIC.1 In the revised nosology EDS VIIA and B are combined as the arthrochalasia type of EDS2 and, because of significant differences in the clinical phenotypes and molecular pathology, are separated from EDS VIIC, which is now called the dermatosparaxis type of EDS. EDS VIIA and VIIB (arthrochalasia type) are autosomal dominant disorders and the patients present with bilateral congenital hip dislocations, extreme multiple joint laxity, and recurrent subluxations of both large and small joints. Thoracolumbar scoliosis, short stature, and muscle hypotonia are common features. EDS VIIC (dermatosparaxis type) is a rare autosomal recessive form and the patients present with generally lax, extremely fragile, redundant skin analogous to the animal disease dermatosparaxis,3 4 umbilical or inguinal hernias, blue sclerae, numerous palmar creases, and micrognathia. They develop joint laxity but without subluxations.

Type I collagen is the major structural protein of the connective tissues affected in EDS VII. It is a heterotrimeric protein containing two α1(I) chains and one α2(I) chain, the products of the two genes COL1A1 andCOL1A2. It is initially synthesised as a precursor protein having additional peptide sequences (propeptides) at both ends of the molecule; these must be removed by specific proteolytic enzymes to generate the mature protein.5Failure to cleave the amino-terminal propeptides and subsequent lack of intermolecular cross linking produces the EDS VII phenotypes. In EDS VIIA and B (arthrochalasia type), mutations in theCOL1A1 or COL1A2genes respectively result in the loss of exon 6 sequences from the mature mRNA. In both genes, exon 6 encodes a short junctional peptide sequence between a small triple helical segment in the N-propeptide and the major triple helical domain of the protein. It contains the procollagen N-proteinase cleavage site and a lysine residue involved in intermolecular cross linking. In EDS VIIC (dermatosparaxis type), the enzyme that performs the processing, procollagen N-proteinase, is defective.3 4 6

We have investigated three cases of EDS VII and report the clinical phenotypes and molecular characterisation. The first has a unique de novo genomic deletion resulting in the loss of two exons (5 and 6) fromCOL1A1 transcripts, the second has a heterozygous mutation of the 3′ acceptor splice signal of IVS5 leading to alternative splicing of COL1A1 exon 6, and the third is heterozygous for a G+1→T in the donor splice site of COL1A2 IVS6 and has a mother who is mosaic for the mutation.

Proband 1, a girl, was born at 38 weeks' gestation by caesarian section for breech position after an uncomplicated pregnancy. Birth weight was 2790 g (25th centile). At birth, a right femoral fracture, bilateral dislocation of the hips, extreme joint hypermobility (especially the knees), large anterior and posterior fontanelles, and frontal bossing were noted. The skin was normal. Soon after birth she was found to be myopic and subsequently developed keratoconus. In the first year of life, she suffered recurrent dislocations of the elbows and knees with persistent hip subluxation. Development was appropriate apart from delayed motor milestones. At 14 months of age (fig 1), height and weight were on 25th centile and there was generalised joint laxity with particularly marked instability of the left hip. There was mild cutis laxa with a criss cross patterning of the hands and feet. The sclerae were blue and dentition normal. When re-examined at 4 years 6 months, her joints were still very hypermobile with subluxation of the radial heads and the small joints of the hands and feet. The instability of the knees and ankles precluded weight bearing and necessitated ambulation by means of “bottom shuffling” or wheelchair. The skin had developed easy abrasion and tearing but healed readily with normal scar formation. The proband was the youngest of three sibs born to non-consanguineous, white parents. The older sibs were clinically unaffected twins. The mother had mild joint hypermobility but no other stigmata of EDS. A skin biopsy was obtained from the proband. Blood samples were obtained from the parents.

Figure 1

Clinical features of proband 1 showing joint laxity in the hands and feet.

Proband 2 was a boy born after 36 weeks of his mother's first pregnancy weighing 2900 g. Both feet were rotated outwards to an angle of 180° because of bilateral hip dislocations. These were treated initially with plaster casts. When he was 1 year old, an attempt at surgical stabilisation failed. At 1 week old he suffered a spontaneous fracture of his right femur during bathing and at the age of 7 years he fractured his skull in a minor fall; subsequent skullx rays showed multiple wormian bones. He has also suffered a crush fracture of one thumb. Clinical examination at 9 years 6 months showed a small child (<3rd centile for height and weight) who was facially dysmorphic with frontal bossing, hypertelorism, epicanthic folds, and blue sclerae (fig 2). His teeth showed generalised dentinogenesis imperfecta. The skin was generally lax, redundant, and hyperextensible but was without scarring or bruising. There was a prominent criss cross patterning on both palms and soles. Both large and small joints were extremely lax. A progressive, severe kyphoscoliosis, convex to the right, had developed from the age of 3 months. He was confined to a wheelchair because the severe laxity of the hips and knees made them unable to bear weight. He was intellectually advanced and talked before he was 1 year old. He has a clinically normal maternal half sister but no full sibs. His father has ankylosing spondylitis but otherwise there was no family history of connective tissue disorders. A skin sample was obtained from the child for molecular and electron microscopy studies.

Figure 2

Clinical features of proband 2 showing joint laxity, dentinogenesis imperfecta, and skin hyperextensibility.

Proband 3 was a boy who presented with a history of chronic instability and recurrent dislocations of both knees and elbows, which were sufficiently severe to require heavy external supportive harnesses but not surgical intervention. During infancy he had suffered temporary hip dislocations which had responded to splinting. He was a late walker and somewhat accident prone because of his joint laxity. In the perinatal period he had a temporary hiatus hernia. Clinical examination at 10 years of age showed a slightly dysmorphic face with frontal bossing and both face and upper chest showed mild cutis laxa. The joints were extremely hypermobile (Beighton score 9/9) with bilateral dislocations of the radial heads and excessively extensible wrists, elbows, knees, and ankles (fig 3). His feet were broad and diamond shaped with severe premature hallux valgus and pes planus on weight bearing. There was mild scarring of the forehead, chin, and knees. His father was clinically normal but his mother showed slightly increased joint mobility. Initially a sputum sample, then a blood sample were obtained from the proband but a skin biopsy was not available. Blood samples were obtained from both parents.

Figure 3

Clinical features of proband 3 showing joint laxity.

Portions of the skin samples from probands 1 and 2 were processed for transmission electron microscopy as previously described.7Both had collagen fibres with irregular, angulated cross sections in marked contrast to the smooth, round outlines of the control fibres (fig 4).

Figure 4

Electron micrographs of collagen fibril cross sections in skin from probands 1, 2, and a control.

Skin fibroblasts from probands 1 and 2 were labelled with14C-proline (1 μCi/ml).7 Proteins were harvested from the medium by ethanol precipitation and from the cell layers by lysis in acetic acid/triton X100 at 4°C. Medium and cell layer procollagens were converted to collagen by limited proteolysis with pepsin, trypsin, or chymotrypsin. Cells were also labelled in the presence of 0.05% dextran sulphate for 24 hours, the washed cells were then scraped into PBS, collected by centrifugation, and extracted with 0.1 mol/l NH4HCO3/0.1% SDS by incubating for five minutes in a boiling water bath. Aliquots of the extracts were lyophilised for gel electrophoresis. Procollagen and collagen chains were analysed on 5% polyacrylamide gels containing 2 mol/l urea using the tris-glycine-SDS system.8

The SDS-PAGE gels of the mercaptoethanol reduced procollagens from proband 1 showed an additional band just below the normal proα1(I) chain (fig 5A). Unreduced, the procollagens showed an extra band just below the normal pNα1(I) position (fig 5A). Following trypsin or pepsin digestion under standard conditions (50 μg/ml enzyme, 15°C, four hours), the proband's collagens appeared normal on gels. However, with chymotrypsin or reduced pepsin concentrations an extra band above the normal α1(I) was apparent in the patient's sample but not in controls (fig 5B). This extra component migrated slightly faster than a normal pNα1(I) chain. Extracts of the proband's cell layer after dextran sulphate supplemented labelling showed persistent pNα1(I) and pNα2(I) chains, which were not seen in control cells (fig5C).

Figure 5

SDS polyacrylamide gels of collagenous proteins produced by skin fibroblasts from proband 1. (A) Patient (P) and control (C) medium procollagens with (+MSH) and without (−MSH) reduction with mercaptoethanol. Proα1(I)m and pNα1(I)m are the abnormal protein seen in the patient (P) and not in a control (C). (B) Collagens derived by limited digestion with proteolytic enzymes of patient (P) and control (C) medium procollagens; numbers above bars refer to enzyme concentration in μg/ml. (C) Cell layer extracts of control (C) and patient (P) cells after labelling in the presence of dextran sulphate.

The reduced procollagens of proband 2 (fig 6A) and the collagens derived by standard pepsin and trypsin digestion showed a normal profile on SDS-PAGE. However, chymotrypsin or lower concentrations of pepsin again showed a band running behind the α1(I) chain (fig 6B). Labelling of post confluent cultures or with dextran sulphate showed a pNα1(I) band in the cell layer extract (fig 6C).

Figure 6

SDS polyacrylamide gels of collagenous proteins produced by skin fibroblasts from proband 2. (A) Mercaptoethanol reduced medium procollagens from patient (P) and control (C) cells. (B) Proteolytic enzyme digests of native medium procollagens from patient (P) and control (C); numbers above bars indicate enzyme concentrations in μg/ml. (C) Cell layer extracts of control (C) and patient (P) cells after dextran sulphate supplemented cell labelling.

RNA was isolated from the fibroblast cultures of probands 1 and 2 and controls by the NP40 lysis technique9 or by RNeasy kit (Qiagen). RT-PCR of control fibroblast RNA with primers from exon 1 and exon 8 of COL1A1 yielded a product of approximately 700 bp; however, the RNA from proband 1 gave only a single product of about 500 bp (fig 7A). Although this appeared to indicate homozygosity for the shortened product, it was found that mixing patient and control RTs in equal amounts also yielded only low molecular weight product (fig 7A, lane P+C), indicating that the smaller fragment was being selectively amplified. Comparing the sequences of a control 700 bp fragment and the patient's 500 bp product cloned into M13mp18 and M13mp19 identified a deletion of the 174 bp comprising exons 5 and 6 of COL1A1(fig 7B).

Figure 7

RT-PCR of proband 1. (A) 1.25% agarose gel of RT-PCR products from patient (P), control (C), and mixed patient and control (P+C) RTs. L is a 1 kb ladder size marker. (B) Sequence of cloned cDNA from patient and control.

Genomic DNA was isolated from fibroblasts of proband 1 and blood from both her parents. Amplification of the proband's DNA from exon 3 to exon 8 of COL1A1 yielded an 800 bp fragment as the only significant product, whereas the control and parental DNA gave a single band of approximately 1.6 kb (fig 8A). The patient's fragment was sequenced directly and also after cloning into M13 vectors (fig 8B). The sequence when compared to the published genomic sequence of exons 1-25 of COL1A1 (GenBank Accession No M20789) was in agreement through exon 4 and intron 4 and for the first 22 bp of exon 5, but then a T insertion was followed by a deletion of 883 bp to the ninth base of intron 6. Amplification of the proband's genomic DNA with primers from intron 5 (within the deleted region) and intron 7 of COL1A1 yielded a product of normal size with normal exon 6 splice junction sequences, indicating that a normal allele was also present (data not shown).

Figure 8

PCR amplification of genomic DNA from proband 1 and her parents. (A) 1% agarose gel of PCR products from patient (P), her mother (M), and father (F); L is a 1 kb ladder. (B) Sequence of cloned genomic PCR fragment from patient.

The RT-PCR of proband 2's RNA from exon 1 to exon 8 ofCOL1A1 yielded multiple products (fig 9A). There was one fragment of normal size, another slightly smaller, and a third, apparently minor, product was considerably smaller than normal. There were also several higher molecular weight bands which could be attributed to heteroduplexes. Cloning and sequencing of the various fragments identified three sequences (fig 9B); one corresponded to the normal sequence, the second to a deletion of the first 15 bp of exon 6, and the third was missing all 72 bp of exon 6 ofCOL1A1.

Figure 9

RT-PCR of proband 2. (A) agarose gel of patient (P) and control (C) RT-PCR fragments; M is 1 kb ladder. (B) Sequence of cloned PCR fragments from patients.

Genomic DNA was isolated from proband 2's fibroblasts and amplified from intron 5 to intron 7 of COL1A1. This yielded a single, normal sized product. Direct sequencing (fig 10A) showed heterozygosity for a G-1→A substitution at the 3′ end of intron 5 which disrupted the obligatory -AG- of the splice acceptor site. The mutation eliminated anXbaI restriction site and the loss of this site in the proband's DNA confirmed the presence of the mutation (fig10B).

Figure 10

(A) Direct sequence of genomic DNA PCR product from proband 2 and control. (B) Polyacrylamide gel of XbaI digest of genomic DNA from patient (P) and control (C); M is 1 kb ladder.

Only genomic DNA was available from proband 3 and his parents. In the absence of any previous indication of the nature of his mutation, bothCOL1A1 and COL1A2genes were examined. PCR amplification with primers from intron 5 and intron 7 of COL1A1 yielded a single product with a normal sequence. Amplification between introns 5 and 6 ofCOL1A2 gave a normal sized product whose sequence showed heterozygosity for a G+1→T transversion in the IVS6 donor splice site (fig 11A). Allele specific oligonucleotides (ASOs) were hybridised to Southern blotted amplified genomic DNA from the patient, both parents, and several controls. All samples gave a strong signal with the wild type ASO; the mutant ASO gave a strong signal for the proband and a weak signal for his mother (not shown) suggesting that she may be a low level mosaic. For confirmation of the mutation, specific antisense ARMS primers were designed: Wt-ARMS 5′-GCTAAGATAAACAGATAAGCAAAC-3′, Mu-ARMS 5′-GCTAAGATAAACAGATAAGCACAA-3′ with mismatches 3 bp from the 3′ end (underlined) to enhance amplification specificity under optimised conditions. These were coupled with theCOL1A2 intron 5 primer for PCR amplification of genomic DNA and the products analysed on polyacrylamide gels. All samples gave a good signal with the normal (Wt-ARMS) primer combination. Using the mutant (Mu-ARMS) primer pair, the patient's DNA gave a strong signal, the mother's DNA again gave a weak signal, while the father's and all control DNA was negative (fig 11B), confirming the mother was a somatic mosaic.

Figure 11

(A) Sequence of cloned genomic DNA PCR fragment from proband 3. (B) Polyacrylamide gel of ARMS amplimers of genomic DNA from proband 3 (P), his mother (M), father (F), and controls (C1-C3) with normal (Wt-ARMS) and mutant (Mu-ARMS) specific primers. L is 1 kb ladder.

All three patients show the cardinal clinical features of autosomal dominant EDS VII (arthrochalasia type). The dentinogenesis imperfecta in proband 2 is a particularly unusual feature as this has not been reported previously in EDS VII, although it is a well known characteristic of osteogenesis imperfecta. Probands 1 and 2 clearly have the more severe clinical phenotypes. This is consistent with them having mutations in COL1A1 for, as a consequence of the stoichiometry of the type I collagen molecule [α1(I)2 α2(I)], 75% of the molecules produced by heterozygous mutations in COL1A1 are abnormal compared to 50% for similar mutations inCOL1A2. The electron micrographs of skin from probands 1 and 2 show an abnormal fibrillogenesis which is intermediate between the grossly abnormal hieroglyphic fibrils of patients with EDS VIIC,3 4 where all molecules are affected, and those of patients with COL1A2mutations whose fibrils generally retain a smooth outline.10

After a standard pepsin digestion procedure, proband 1 yielded apparently normal collagens on SDS gels although the procollagen profile was abnormal. Neither the procollagens nor the collagens (derived by standard pepsin digestion) of proband 2 gave any indication of an abnormality. Only a more restricted proteolysis with much lower concentrations of pepsin or with chymotrypsin showed a protein abnormality. The inclusion of low concentrations of dextran sulphate during cell labelling is known to enhance the natural processing of procollagens to collagens in vitro11 and clearly showed abnormalities in the cells from probands 1 and 2. There were, however, subtle differences between the two for, while proband 1 accumulated both pNα1(I) and pNα2(I) chains in the cell layer, proband 2 showed only pNα1(I) chains, suggesting that in the latter the normal pNα2(I) chains incorporated into mutant molecules could still be cleaved by the N-propeptidase.

Proband 1 is unique among reported cases of EDS VII in that her mutation results in the loss of not just one but two exons (5 and 6) from the amino-terminus of the proα1(I) chain. Loss of exons 5 and 6 deletes 58 amino acids from the proα1(I) N-propeptide including 12 of the 17 triplets of the short triple helical domain, the telopeptide (containing the procollagen peptidase cleavage site and a lysine residue involved in intermolecular cross linking), and the first triplet of the major triple helical domain. When PCR amplification of both cDNA and genomic DNA from proband 1 gave only single, deleted fragments it seemed she might be homozygous for the defect. This was not consistent with two forms of proα1(I) chain observed in the patient's protein gels. The absence of any evidence of the smaller fragment in either of the parent's DNA excluded recessive inheritance and also excluded the possibility of maternal somatic mosaicism suggested by the mother's mild joint laxity. Further investigations confirmed the proband possessed one normalCOL1A1 allele and indicated the mutation arose de novo in the child.

The genomic mutation in proband 2 eliminates the normal -AG- splice acceptor signal at the 3′ end of COL1A1intron 5 leading to alternative splicing of the mutant allele to yield two products. A minor product in which the whole of exon 6 is skipped and a major product where an in frame -AG- within exon 6 (bp 14 and 15) is used as a cryptic splice site to yield a protein missing the first five amino acids of exon 6. Both products delete the procollagen peptidase cleavage site although the smaller deletion does retain some of the telopeptide sequences. Similar observations have been made in an unrelated patient with an identical mutation12 and with analogous COL1A2 mutations identified in two additional EDS VII patients.12 13

Since only genomic DNA was available for proband 3, sequences around exon 6 in both the COL1A1 andCOL1A2 genes, the sites previously identified for mutations in this disorder, were investigated. The single base substitution G+1→T identified in the donor splice site of COL1A2 intron 6 conforms to the pattern established in previous cases of EDS VII insofar as it disrupts the obligate -GT- splice signal. This should cause skipping of exon 6 and inhibit the processing of the procollagen.10 12 16-23 Biochemical studies of two unrelated patients with an identical mutation have confirmed this does occur.12 Allele specific oligonucleotide (ASO) hybridisation of parental DNA raised the possibility of mosaicism in the mother. ARMS primers were used to provide a more rigorous test for the mutation. In this test, the mother's DNA consistently gave a weak signal with the mutant specific primers; this confirmed her mosaicism and might explain her mild joint laxity. This is the first reported instance of parental mosaicism in this disorder.

Ten different genomic mutations have now been detected in EDS VIIA and B (arthrochalasia type) patients (table 1) and all lead to the skipping or alternative splicing of exon 6 sequences and the inhibition of N-propeptide cleavage. It is clear thatCOL1A1 mutations are under-represented in this list despite the fact that they appear to cause a more severe clinical phenotype. Whether this disparity is because of a higher mutation rate in the COL1A2 gene or phenotypic variation of COL1A1 mutations or because of underdiagnosis of COL1A1mutations by routine protein analysis is unclear. Perhaps when investigating suspected EDS VII patients, alternative approaches, such as dextran sulphate supplemented radiolabelling or more restricted proteolysis of the secreted procollagens, would prove more informative. Electron microscopy if available can also be a useful aid to diagnosis of COL1A1 mutations.

Table 1

Mutations leading to Ehlers-Danlos type VII (arthrochalasia type)


The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr E H Thompson for giving access to proband 3, Padmini Sarathachandra, Barrie Harrison, and Michelle Gaunt for the electron microscopy, and Maureen Laidlaw for maintaining the fibroblast culture.



  • 218 Present address: Queensland Genetics Service, Royal Children's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia 4029