Abstract
THE molecular mechanisms underlying the voltage dependence of intercellular channels formed by the family of vertebrate gap junction proteins (connexins) are unknown. All vertebrate gap junctions are sensitive to the voltage difference between the cells, defined as the transjunctional voltage, Vj (refs 1, 2), and most appear to gate by the separate actions of their component hemichannels3–8. The heterotypic Cx32/Cx26 junction displays an unpredicted rectification that was reported to represent a novel Vj dependence created by hemichannel interactions, mediated in part by the first extracellular loop E1 (ref. 9). Here we show that aspects of the rectification of Cx32/Cx26 junctions are explained by opposite gating polarities of the component hemichannels, and that the opposite gating polarity of Cx32 and Cx26 results from a charge difference in a single amino-acid residue located at the second position in the N terminus. We also show that charge substitutions at the border of the first transmembrane (Ml) and E1 domains can reverse gating polarity and suppress the effects of a charge substitution at the N terminus. We conclude that the combined actions of residues at the N terminus and Ml/El border form a charge complex that is probably an integral part of the connexin voltage sensor. A consistent correlation between charge substitu-tion and gating polarity indicates that Cx26 and Cx32 voltage sensors are oppositely charged and that both move towards the cytoplasm upon hemichannel closure.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Spray, D. C., Harris, A. L. & Bennett, M. V. L. J. gen. Physiol. 77, 77–93 (1981).
Bennett, M. V. L. & Verselis, V. K. Semin. Cell Biol. 3, 29–47 (1992).
Harris, A. L., Spray, D. C. & Bennett, M. V. L. J. gen. Physiol. 77, 95–117 (1981).
Swenson, K. I., Jordan, J. R., Beyer, E. C. & Paul, D. L. Cell 57, 145–155 (1989).
Werner, R., Levine, E., Rabadan-Diehl, C. & Dahl, G. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 243, 5–11 (1991).
Hennemann, H. et al., J. Cell Biol. 117, 1299–1310 (1992).
Bruzzone, R., Haefliger, J. A., Gimlich, R. L. & Paul, D. L. Molec. Biol. Cell 4, 7–20 (1993).
Bennett, M. V. L., Verselis, V., White, R. L. & Spray, D. C. in Gap Junctions (eds Hertsberg, E. L. & Johnson, R. G.) 287–304 (Liss, New York, 1988).
Rubin, J. B., Verselis, V. K., Bennett, M. V. L. & Bargiello, T. A. Biophys. J. 62, 197–209 (1992).
Bennett, M. V. L. et al. Neuron 6, 305–320 (1991).
Haefliger, J. et al. J. biol. Chem. 267, 2057–2064 (1992).
Barrio, L. C. et al. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 8410–8414 (1991).
Obaid, A. L., Socolar, S. J. & Rose, B. J. Membr. Biol. 73, 69–89 (1983).
Verselis, V. K., Bennett, M. V. L. & Bargiello, T. A. Biophys. J. 59, 114–126 (1991).
Paul, D. L., Ebihara, L., Takemoto, L. J., Swenson, K. I. & Goodenough, D. A. J. Cell Biol. 115, 1077–1089 (1991).
Devries, S. H. & Schwartz, E. A. J. Physiol. 455, 201–230 (1992).
Suchyna, T. M., Lie, X. X., Gao, F., Fourtner, C. R. & Nicholson, B. J. Nature 365, 847–849 (1993).
Ho, K. et al. Nature 362, 31–38 (1993).
Kubo, Y., Baldwin, T. J., Jan, Y. N. & Jan, L. Y. Nature 362, 127–133 (1993).
Silver, M. R. & DeCoursey, T. E. J. gen. Physiol. 96, 109–134 (1990).
Noda, M. et al. Nature 312, 121–127 (1984).
Liman, E. R., Hess, P., Weaver, F. & Koren, G. Nature 353, 752–756 (1991).
Thomas, L., Blachly-Dyson, E., Colombini, M. & Forte, M. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 5446–5449 (1993).
Rubin, J. B. thesis, Albert Einstein Coll. Med., New York (1992).
Wilders, R. & Jongsma, H. J. Biophys. J. 63, 942–953 (1992).
Papazian, D. M., Timpe, L. C., Jan, Y. N. & Jan, L. Y. Nature 349, 305–310 (1991).
Rubin, J. B., Verselis, V. K., Bennett, M. V. L. & Bargiello, T. A. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89, 3820–3824 (1992).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Verselis, V., Ginter, C. & Bargiello, T. Opposite voltage gating polarities of two closely related onnexins. Nature 368, 348–351 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1038/368348a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/368348a0
This article is cited by
-
The role of the Cx43/Cx45 gap junction voltage gating on wave propagation and arrhythmogenic activity in cardiac tissue
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
The structures and gating mechanism of human calcium homeostasis modulator 2
Nature (2019)
-
Whole-genome sequencing reveals a recurrent missense mutation in the Connexin 46 (GJA3) gene causing autosomal-dominant lamellar cataract
Eye (2018)
-
The connexin 46 mutant (V44M) impairs gap junction function causing congenital cataract
Journal of Genetics (2017)
-
Identification and functional analysis of two novel connexin 50 mutations associated with autosome dominant congenital cataracts
Scientific Reports (2016)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.