Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Mox2 is a component of the genetic hierarchy controlling limb muscle development

Abstract

The skeletal muscles of the limbs develop from myogenic progenitors that originate in the paraxial mesoderm and migrate intothe limb-bud mesenchyme1. Among the genes known to be important for muscle development in mammalian embryos are those encoding the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs; MyoD, Myf5, myogenin and MRF4)2,3,4 and Pax3, a paired-type homeobox gene that is critical for the development of limb musculature5,6,7. Mox1 and Mox2 are closely related homeobox genes that are expressed in overlapping patterns in the paraxial mesoderm and its derivatives8,9. Here we show that mice homozygous for a null mutation of Mox2 have a developmental defect of the limb musculature, characterized by an overall reduction in muscle mass and elimination of specific muscles. Mox2 is not needed for the migration of myogenic precursors into the limb bud, but it is essential for normal appendicular muscle formation and for the normal regulation of myogenic genes, as demonstrated by the downregulation of Pax3 and Myf5 but not MyoD in Mox2-deficient limb buds. Our findings show that the MOX2 homeoprotein is an important regulator of vertebrate limb myogenesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Expression of Mox1 and Mox2 in the paraxial mesoderm and the limb buds of mouse embryos.
Figure 2: Targeted disruption of the Mox2 locus.
Figure 3: Limb muscle defects of Mox2 homozygous mutants.
Figure 4: Limb muscle morphogenesis is disrupted in Mox2−/− embryos.
Figure 5: Gene expression in migrating limb myoblasts of Mox2−/− embryos.
Figure 6: Differential expression of MyoD and Myf5 genes in limb myoblasts of Mox2−/− embryos.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Christ, B., Jacob, H. J. & Jacob, M. Experimental analysis of the origin of the wing musculature in avian embryos. Anat. Embryol. (Berl.) 150, 171–186 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Buckingham, M. Making muscle in mammals. Trends Genet. 8, 144–148 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cossu, G., Tajbakhsh, S. & Buckingham, M. How is myogenesis initiated in the embryo? Trends Genet. 12, 218–223 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rudnicki, M. A. & Jaenisch, R. The MyoD family of transcription factors and skeletal myogenesis. Bioessays 17, 203–209 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bober, E., Franz, T., Arnold, H. H., Gruss, P. & Tremblay, P. Pax-3 is required for the development of limb muscles: a possible role for the migration of dermomyotomal muscle progenitor cells. Development 120, 603–612 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goulding, M., Lumsden, A. & Paquette, A. J. Regulation of Pax-3 expression in the dermomyotome and its role in muscle development. Development 120, 957–971 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Williams, B. A. & Ordahl, C. P. Pax-3 expression in segmental mesoderm marks early stages in myogenic cell specification. Development 120, 785–796 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Candia, A. F. et al . Mox-1 and Mox-2 define a novel homeobox gene subfamily and are differentially expressed during early mesodermal patterning in mouse embryos. Development 116, 1123–1136 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Candia, A. F. & Wright, C. V. Differential localization of Mox-1 and Mox-2 proteins indicates distinct roles during development. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 40, 1179–1184 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Daston, G., Lamar, E., Olivier, M. & Goulding, M. Pax-3 is necessary for migration but not differentiation of limb muscle precursors in the mouse. Development 122, 1017–1027 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Deconinck, A. E. et al . Utrophin-dystrophin-deficient mice as a model for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Cell 90, 717–727 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wachtler, F. & Jacob, M. Origin and development of the cranial skeletal muscles. Bibl. Anat. 29, 24–46 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wright, W. E., Sassoon, D. A. & Lin, V. K. Myogenin, a factor regulating myogenesis, has a domain homologous to MyoD. Cell 56, 607–617 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sassoon, D. et al . Expression of two myogenic regulatory factors myogenin and MyoD1 during mouse embryogenesis. Nature 341, 303–307 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yee, S. P. & Rigby, P. W. The regulation of myogenin gene expression during the embryonic development of the mouse. Genes Dev. 7, 1277–1289 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bladt, F., Riethmacher, D., Isenmann, S., Aguzzi, A. & Birchmeier, C. Essential role for the c-met receptor in the migration of myogenic precursor cells into the limb bud. Nature 376, 768–771 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jagla, K. et al . Mouse Lbx1 and human LBX1 define a novel mammalian homeobox gene family related to the Drosophila ladybird genes. Mech. Dev. 53, 345–356 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tajbakhsh, S., Rocancourt, D., Cossu, G. & Buckingham, M. Redefining the genetic hierarchies controlling skeletal myogenesis: Pax-3 and Myf-5 act upstream of MyoD. Cell 89, 127–138 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Maina, F. et al . Uncoupling of Grb2 from the Met receptor in vivo reveals complex roles in muscle development. Cell 87, 531–542 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kardon, G. Muscle and tendon morphogenesis in the avian hind limb. Development 125, 4019–4032 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chevallier, A., Kieny, M. & Mauger, A. Limb-somite relationship: origin of the limb musculature. J.Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 41, 245–258 (1977).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jacob, H. & Christ, B. in Teratology of the Limbs (eds Merker, H. J., Nau, H. & Neubert, D.) 89–97 (Walter de Gruyter and Co., Berlin, (1980).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Grim, M. & Wachtler, F. Muscle morphogenesis in the absence of myogenic cells. Anat. Embryol. (Berl.) 183, 67–70 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yamamoto, M. et al . Coordinated expression of Hoxa-11 and Hoxa-13 during limb muscle patterning. Development 125, 1325–1335 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mansour, S. L., Thomas, K. R. & Capecchi, M. R. Disruption of the proto-oncogene int-2 in mouse embryo-derived stem cells: a general strategy for targeting mutations to non-selectable genes. Nature 336, 348–352 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Henrique, D. et al . Expression of a Delta homologue in prospective neurons in the chick. Nature 375, 787–790 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank S. Tajbakhsh for providing us with the Splotch2H embryos; R. Balling, P.Gruss and K. Jagla for providing us with Pax1, Pax3, and Lbx1 probes, respectively; T. Partridge for expert advice on histopathology; S. Hughes for useful discussions; H. Boyes for animal husbandry; and F.Costantini, in whose laboratory this work was initiated. This work was supported by the MRC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vassilis Pachnis.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mankoo, B., Collins, N., Ashby, P. et al. Mox2 is a component of the genetic hierarchy controlling limb muscle development. Nature 400, 69–73 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/21892

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/21892

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing