Bad bones, absent smell, selfish testes: The pleiotropic consequences of human FGF receptor mutations

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cytogfr.2005.03.001Get rights and content

Abstract

The discovery in 1994 that highly specific mutations of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor 3 caused the most common form of human short-limbed dwarfism, achondroplasia, heralded a new era in FGF receptor (FGFR) biology. A decade later, the purpose of this review is to survey how the study of humans with FGFR mutations continues to provide insights into FGFR function in health and disease, and the clinical applications of these findings. Amongst the most interesting recent discoveries have been the description of novel phenotypes associated with FGFR1 and FGFR3 mutations; identification of fundamental differences in the cellular mechanisms of mutant FGFR2 and FGFR3 action; and the direct identification of FGFR2 and FGFR3 mutations in sperm. These clinical observations illustrate the pleiotropism of FGFR action and fuel ongoing efforts to understand the rich biology and pathophysiology of the FGF signalling system.

Introduction

In 1994, two groups independently described the identification of specific heterozygous nucleotide substitutions (1138G > A or C, both encoding Gly380Arg) of the FGFR3 gene in 39 unrelated individuals with achondroplasia, accounting for all cases studied [1], [2]. This remarkable discovery presaged a burst of activity that led to the identification of germline mutations in the FGFR1 and FGFR2 genes within just a few months [3], [4], [5]. Striking parallels in the early findings between the different fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) heralded several emergent themes that have continued to dominate the agenda of human genetics research in this field. The mutations identified were dominantly acting, encoded a relatively limited repertoire of specific missense substitutions that caused congenital skeletal abnormalities (either short-limbed bone dysplasia or craniosynostosis, the premature fusion of the cranial sutures), and many occurred recurrently with remarkably high rates of new mutation. It soon became apparent, at least for FGFR2 and FGFR3, that different mutations within each gene were associated with distinct phenotypes, constituting allelic series [6], [7]. This in turn implied quantitative or qualitative differences in the function of mutant proteins, spawning efforts to study these differences using biochemical and mouse genetic approaches. Subsequent human genetic discoveries of particular importance have been the description of a common, hitherto unrecognised craniosynostosis syndrome caused by a specific FGFR3 P250R mutation [8], [9] and the more recent findings that haploinsufficiency and constitutive gain-of-function mutations of FGFR1, and a putative dominant negative mutation of FGFR3, cause strikingly different phenotypes from those associated with the earlier described mutations [10], [11], [12].

Another challenge has been to explain the very high rates of specific FGFR mutations, some of which appear elevated ∼500-fold above background levels. Several of the most frequent mutations have been shown to originate exclusively from the unaffected father and are associated with increased paternal age, relative to the population average, at the time of conception. These observations have led to efforts to identify these specific mutations in sperm, which have recently been successful [13], [14], [15]. Evidence for the paradoxical selective advantage of an FGFR2 mutation in the testis [14] provides an unexpected example of the pleiotropism of mutant FGFR action.

Many reviews on different aspects of the human genetics of FGFR mutation have been published [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25]. Approaches such as biochemical dissection and structural analysis are addressed elsewhere in this issue [26], [27], [28]. The scope of this article will be to collate and update information gleaned from the clinical study of humans with germline FGFR mutations, focusing particularly on discoveries of the past five years. Somatically arising FGFR mutations associated with cancer are reviewed in an accompanying article [29].

Section snippets

Spectrum of germline FGFR mutations

The full spectrum of FGFR mutations in human genetic disorders, including the relative prevalence of different mutations, was comprehensively surveyed by Passos-Bueno et al. [18] and Muenke and Wilkie [20]. Table 1 itemises additional FGFR mutations [10], [11], [12], [22], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50] that were not included in those reviews. In this article I shall refer to the FGFR domains in which

Prevalence of de novo FGFR mutations

The estimation of disease prevalence is important, when considering both the overall clinical burden of FGFR mutations, and for evaluating data on mutation levels in sperm (Section 6). Much of the epidemiological work on disease prevalence was undertaken in the pre-molecular era, so that some data are likely to be confounded by unrecognised genetic heterogeneity. Table 3 attempts to synthesize the most reliable studies, and proposes overall birth prevalence figures for de novo FGFR2 and FGFR3

Introductory remarks

An important challenge is to understand how FGFR mutations lead to a diversity of specific phenotypes in humans; the phenotypes of greatest interest include long bone dysplasia, craniosynostosis, syndactyly, acanthosis nigricans and abnormalities of the central nervous system. To date, human studies have focused on the origins of long bone dysplasia [81], [82], [83], [84], [85], [86], [87] (Table 4) and craniosynostosis [88], [89], [90], [91], [92], [93], [94], [95], [96], [97], [98], [99],

Paternal origin of FGFR mutations

To understand why specific nucleotide substitutions occur so frequently in the FGFR2 and FGFR3 genes, previous work has focused on the parental origin of FGFR2 mutations causing Apert, Crouzon and Pfeiffer syndromes, and FGFR3 mutations causing achondroplasia and Muenke syndromes, and the relationship with parental age. Aided by the localized nature of these mutations, the most commonly used analytical approach has been to study trios of affected children and their unaffected, mutation-negative

Estimates of mutation levels in sperm

The exclusive paternal origin of germline FGFR mutations has led three groups to develop methods to identify these mutations directly in the sperm. Tiemann-Boege et al. studied the FGFR31138G > A achondroplasia mutation using a combination of primer-mismatch PCR amplification and restriction digest (to select mutant FGFR3 sequences) with allele-specific quantitative amplification of the specific mutant sequence [13]. Goriely et al. studied the FGFR2755C > G Apert syndrome mutation using two rounds

FGFR diagnostics and genetic counselling

The description of FGFR mutations in bone dysplasias and craniosynostosis has obvious applications in genetic diagnostics; GeneTests (www.genetests.org) lists 13 and 23 laboratories respectively that offer mutation testing for craniosynostosis syndromes (FGFR2) and achondroplasia (FGFR3). Molecular genetic testing is frequently necessary to establish the correct diagnosis. It is essential for the recognition of Muenke syndrome, for which heterozygosity for the 749C > G (P250R) mutation in FGFR3

Unsolved questions in FGFR disorders

We have come a long way over the past decade in the study of human phenotypes associated with FGFR disorders. Quite apart from the clinical dividends, this approach has uncovered many fascinating aspects of FGFR biology that would have been very difficult to access by any other means. This review has attempted to illustrate why the human genetics of the FGF receptor mutations is justifiably a paradigm for the application of a phenotype-driven approach to biological investigation.

However, many

Acknowledgements

I am very grateful to Jacky Bonaventure for sharing unpublished data and to Norman Arnheim for discussions. I also thank Dominic Furniss, Anne Goriely, Ruth Hansen and Stephen Twigg for their comments on the manuscript. Work on FGFR mutations in my laboratory is funded by the Wellcome Trust.

References (158)

  • G.A. Bellus et al.

    Distinct missense mutations of the FGFR3 Lys650 codon modulate receptor kinase activation and the severity of the skeletal dysplasia phenotype

    Am J Hum Genet

    (2000)
  • U. Ramaswami et al.

    Genotype and phenotype in hypochondroplasia

    J Pediatr

    (1998)
  • M. Oldridge et al.

    De novo Alu element insertions in FGFR2 identify a distinct pathological basis for Apert syndrome

    Am J Hum Genet

    (1999)
  • L. Legeai-Mallet et al.

    Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 mutations promote apoptosis but do not alter chondrocyte proliferation in thanatophoric dysplasia

    J Biol Chem

    (1998)
  • S. Cormier et al.

    Parathyroid hormone receptor type 1/Indian hedgehog expression is preserved in the growth plate of human fetuses affected with fibroblast growth factor receptor type 3 activating mutations

    Am J Pathol

    (2002)
  • L. Legeai-Mallet et al.

    Overexpression of FGFR3, Stat1, Stat5 and p21Cip1 correlates with phenotypic severity and defective chondrocyte differentiation in FGFR3-related chondrodysplasias

    Bone

    (2004)
  • M. Bodo et al.

    Interleukin pattern of Apert fibroblasts in vitro

    Eur J Cell Biol

    (1998)
  • A. Fragale et al.

    Decreased proliferation and altered differentiation in osteoblasts from genetically and clinically distinct craniosynostotic disorders

    Am J Pathol

    (1999)
  • J. Lemonnier et al.

    The Ser252Trp fibroblast growth factor receptor-2 (FGFR2) mutation induces PKC-independent downregulation of FGFR-2 associated with premature calvaria osteoblast differentiation

    Exp Cell Res

    (2000)
  • J. Lemonnier et al.

    Increased osteoblast apoptosis in Apert craniosynostosis. Role of protein kinase C and interleukin-1

    Am J Pathol

    (2001)
  • F. Rousseau et al.

    Mutations in the gene encoding fibroblast growth factor receptor-3 in achondroplasia

    Nature

    (1994)
  • W. Reardon et al.

    Mutations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 gene cause Crouzon syndrome

    Nat Genet

    (1994)
  • E.W. Jabs et al.

    Jackson–Weiss and Crouzon syndromes are allelic with mutations in fibroblast growth factor receptor 2

    Nat Genet

    (1994)
  • M. Muenke et al.

    A common mutation in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 gene in Pfeiffer syndrome

    Nat Genet

    (1994)
  • A.O.M. Wilkie et al.

    Apert syndrome results from localized mutations of FGFR2 and is allelic with Crouzon syndrome

    Nat Genet

    (1995)
  • P.L. Tavormina et al.

    Thanatophoric dysplasia (types I and II) caused by distinct mutations in fibroblast growth factor receptor 3

    Nat Genet

    (1995)
  • G.A. Bellus et al.

    Identical mutations in three different fibroblast growth factor receptor genes in autosomal dominant craniosynostosis syndromes

    Nat Genet

    (1996)
  • M. Muenke et al.

    A unique point mutation in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 gene (FGFR3) defines a new craniosynostosis syndrome

    Am J Hum Genet

    (1997)
  • C. Dodé et al.

    Loss-of-function mutations in FGFR1 cause autosomal dominant Kallmann syndrome

    Nat Genet

    (2003)
  • R. Toydemir et al.

    A new syndrome caused by a novel loss-of-function mutation in FGFR3

    Am J Hum Genet

    (2003)
  • I. Tiemann-Boege et al.

    The observed human sperm mutation frequency cannot explain the achondroplasia paternal age effect

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2002)
  • A. Goriely et al.

    Evidence for selective advantage of pathogenic FGFR2 mutations in the male germ line

    Science

    (2003)
  • A.O.M. Wilkie

    Craniosynostosis: genes and mechanisms

    Hum Mol Genet

    (1997)
  • M.R. Passos-Bueno et al.

    Clinical spectrum of fibroblast growth factor receptor mutations

    Hum Mutat

    (1999)
  • Z. Vajo et al.

    The molecular and genetic basis of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 disorders: the achondroplasia family of skeletal dysplasias, Muenke craniosynostosis, and Crouzon syndrome with acanthosis nigricans

    Endocr Rev

    (2000)
  • M. Muenke et al.

    Craniosynostosis syndromes

  • K. Yu et al.

    Uncoupling fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 ligand binding specificity leads to Apert syndrome-like phenotypes

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2001)
  • A.O.M. Wilkie et al.

    FGFs, their receptors, and human limb malformations: clinical and molecular correlations

    Am J Med Genet

    (2002)
  • D.M. Ornitz et al.

    FGF signaling pathways in endochondral and intramembranous bone development and human genetic disease

    Genes Dev

    (2002)
  • M.M. Cohen

    FGFs/FGFRs and associated disorders

  • N. Sato et al.

    Clinical assessment and mutation analysis of Kallmann syndrome 1 (KAL1) and fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1, or KAL2) in five families and 18 sporadic patients

    J Clin Endocrinol Metab

    (2004)
  • K. Chun et al.

    Screening of patients with craniosynostosis: molecular strategy

    Am J Med Genet

    (2003)
  • W. Kress et al.

    Clustering of FGFR2 gene mutations in patients with Pfeiffer and Crouzon syndromes (FGFR2-associated craniosynostoses)

    Cytogenet Cell Genet

    (2000)
  • M. Priolo et al.

    Pfeiffer syndrome type 2 associated with a single amino acid deletion in the FGFR2 gene

    Clin Genet

    (2000)
  • P. Lapunzina et al.

    A novel insertion in the FGFR2 gene in a patient with Crouzon phenotype and sacrococcygeal tail

    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol

    (2005)
  • F.-J. Tsai et al.

    Mutation analysis of Crouzon syndrome and identification of one novel mutation in Taiwanese patients

    Pediatr Int

    (2001)
  • El Ghouzzi V, Heuertz S, Bonaventure J, Le Merrer M, Munnich A, Renier D, et al. Mutation analysis in Crouzon and...
  • D. Johnson et al.

    A novel mutation, Ala315Ser, in FGFR2: a gene-environment interaction leading to craniosynostosis?

    Eur J Hum Genet

    (2000)
  • V. El Ghouzzi et al.

    Truncating FgfR2 exon IIIc mutation in a familial form of Jackson–Weiss syndrome

    Am J Hum Genet

    (2001)
  • E.T. Everett et al.

    A novel FGFR2 gene mutation in Crouzon syndrome associated with apparent nonpenetrance

    Cleft Palate Craniofac J

    (1999)
  • Cited by (204)

    • Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

      2022, Comprehensive Pharmacology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text