Elsevier

Schizophrenia Research

Volume 42, Issue 2, 7 April 2000, Pages 83-90
Schizophrenia Research

Increased morbid risk for schizophrenia in families of in-patients with bipolar illness

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-9964(99)00117-6Get rights and content

Abstract

Background. It has been reported that relatives of probands with severe, psychotic forms of bipolar illness have increased rates of schizophrenia but not the relatives of individuals with milder, non-psychotic forms of disorder. In this study, we examined the prevalence of psychiatric disorders in the first degree relatives of a sample of 103 inpatients with bipolar disorder and in a matched control sample of 84 healthy individuals. Method. Relatives of cases and controls were interviewed using the FH-RDC to determine familial morbid risk for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Age- and sex-adjusted morbidity risks were calculated in both samples according to the method of Strömgren. Results. The morbid risks for both bipolar disorder (4.9%) and schizophrenia (2.8%) were higher in relatives of patients than in relatives of controls (0.3% and 0.6% respectively). The relative risks were 14.2 [95% confidence interval (CI)=3.1–64.2] for bipolar disorder and 4.9 (95% CI=1.3–18.8) for schizophrenia. Relatives of women with early onset of bipolar illness had the highest morbid risks for both bipolar illness and schizophrenia. The presence of more than one patient with bipolar disorder in a family increased the risk for schizophrenia nearly fourfold (RR=3.5, 95% CI=1.2–10.2). There was no additional effect of presence of psychotic features. Conclusion. Our results suggest that the transmission of psychosis is not disorder-specific. Bipolar illness characterised by a high familial loading is associated with increased risk of schizophrenia in the relatives.

Introduction

The Kraepelinian distinction between schizophrenic and manic-depressive psychoses is still an enduring tradition in psychiatry. Debates about the adequacy of the distinction should consider the prominent contribution of family studies. Recent findings suggest that the familial liability to schizophrenia is, at least in part, a liability to develop psychosis (Erlenmeyer-Kimling et al., 1997, Kendler et al., 1993, Taylor, 1992). If this were so, one would expect a higher morbid risk (MR) of schizophrenia in the relatives of bipolar disorder at the severest and psychotic end of the disease spectrum. In addition, one would expect, in analogy with findings in relatives of patients with schizophrenia (Sham et al., 1994, Verdoux et al., 1996), a higher familial morbid risk for schizophrenia in bipolar patients with early onset, poor prognosis and female gender. In order to examine these hypotheses, we conducted a familial MR study in a clinically and biologically homogeneous sample of bipolar inpatients and a group of sociodemographically matched controls.

Section snippets

Bipolar patients

Unrelated probands with a well-documented history of bipolar disorder who were admitted to the state psychiatric hospital, Clı́nica Mental Santa Coloma (Barcelona), were recruited from 1994 to 1996. Both the patients and their relatives gave informed consent before inclusion in the study. The patient sample consisted of 103 unrelated white subjects (43 men and 60 women) born in Spain. Each patient was personally interviewed by two experienced psychiatrists (RG or VV) to determine DSM-III-R

Results

First-degree relatives of patients had a higher risk for bipolar disorder [cases MR=4.9%, controls MR=0.3%, RR=14.2; 95% confidence interval (CI)=3.1–64.2; P=0.001], schizoaffective disorder (cases MR=1.5%, controls MR=0.0%; P=0.021), schizophrenia (cases MR=2.8%, controls MR=0.6%; RR=4.9; 95% CI=1.3–18.8; P=0.022) and unspecified functional psychoses (cases MR=2.3, controls MR=0.6%; RR=4.0; 95% CI=1.0–16.3; P=0.054) than first-degree relatives of controls (Table 2). Although the effect was

Methodological issues

A possible bias in our study was that the psychiatrists who assessed family history were not blind to the case/control status of probands. Nevertheless, the use of diagnostic criteria, consensus best estimate method and the high score of the FH-RDC quality of information scale obtained in our study should assure the quality of the methods. Although the family history method has been shown to be of only moderate sensitivity, the FH-RDC structured interview has been validated (Andreasen et al.,

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant (91B/96-97) from the Spanish Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia and the British Council, to Lourdes Fañanás and Jim van Os. Blanca Gutiérrez was awarded a Ph.D. grant by the Vicerrectorat de Recerca from the Universitat de Barcelona. The authors thank the patients and families for their collaboration.

References (38)

  • T.J Crow

    Is there a genetic Kraepelinian dichotomy for manic-depressive illness and schizophrenia? Con: the demise of the Kraepelinian binary systems as a prelude to genetic advance

  • W.W Eaton et al.

    The use of epidemiology for risk factor research in schizophrenia: an overview and methodological critique

  • H Elkis et al.

    Meta-analyses of studies of ventricular enlargement and cortical sulcal prominence in mood disorders. Comparisons with controls or patients with schizophrenia

    Arch. Gen. Psychiatry

    (1995)
  • J Endicott et al.

    Family History-Research Diagnostic Criteria

    (1975)
  • L Erlenmeyer-Kimling et al.

    The New York high-risk project

    Arch. Gen. Psychiatry

    (1997)
  • D.P Goldberg et al.

    Scaled version of the general health questionnaire

    Psychol. Med.

    (1979)
  • M.S Humbert

    FH-RDC. Criterios diagnósticos de investigación. Historia familiar

  • N.M James

    Early- and late-onset bipolar affective disorder. A genetic study

    Arch. Gen. Psychiatry

    (1977)
  • K.S Kendler et al.

    A DSM-III family study of the nonschizophrenic psychotic disorders

    Am. J. Psychiatry

    (1986)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text