Brief clinical and laboratory observation
Sagittal craniostenosis: Fetal head constraint as one possible cause*

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(79)80728-3Get rights and content

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (7)

  • HunterAGW et al.

    Craniosynostosis I: Sagittal synostosis; its genetics and associated clinical findings in 214 patients who lacked involvement of the coronal suture(s)

    Teratology

    (1976)
  • FreemanJM et al.

    Craniostenosis: Review of the literature and report of thirty-four cases

    Pediatrics

    (1962)
  • MossML

    The pathogenesis of premature cranial synostosis in man

    Acta Anat (Basel)

    (1959)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (105)

  • Ten-year experience in the surgical management of craniosynostosis. A series of 96 consecutive patients

    2022, Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case Management
    Citation Excerpt :

    We found a male preponderance within the sagittal synostosis patients; 31 (86%) males. The increased occurrence of sagittal synostosis in males is related to larger fetal head size during the third trimester of pregnancy, resulting in a higher degree of physical constraint of the head in the maternal pelvis. [17] Congenital heart malformations were the most frequent associated to CS.

  • Mechanical and morphological properties of parietal bone in patients with sagittal craniosynostosis

    2022, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
    Citation Excerpt :

    The role that gender may play in predisposing an individual to certain forms of CS has been of interest. It has been suggested that the male predominance in certain forms of CS is attributable to a larger head circumference in male fetuses resulting in a higher degree of intrauterine constraint (Graham et al., 1979; Sloan et al., 1997), while in other studies higher levels of circulating serum androgens (Lin et al., 2007), dysregulation of osteoblast differentiation and genetic factors were demonstrated to contribute to development of sagittal CS and gender related differences (Park et al., 2015). There is limited research available on how the gender difference can affect the material and morphological properties of bone.

  • Surgical Management of Craniosynostosis

    2017, Maxillofacial Surgery, 3rd Edition: Volume 1-2
  • Update in Management of Craniosynostosis

    2022, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
View all citing articles on Scopus
*

Supported by Bureau of Community Health Services, Health Services Administration, Public Health Service, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Project 913; National Institutes of Health Grant No. HD 05961; Public Health Service Grant No. GM 15253; and Research Fellowship Grant, U.S. Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health No. HD-004-04.

View full text