Clinical study
Prevalence of diagnostic abnormalities in patients with genetically transmitted asymmetric septal hypertrophy

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(79)90071-7Get rights and content

Abstract

Echocardiographic studies were performed in 100 patients from a general population with cardiac disease and in 33 patients with classic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy and 116 of their first degree relatives. The findings were compared with those in 35 normal persons. The prevalence rate of asymmetric septal hypertrophy (ventricular septal to free posterior wall ratio greater than 1.3) was 8 percent in the general population with heart disease. No further clinical or echocardiographic evidence was found for a familial disease. The ventricular septal to free posterior wall ratios for this group and the normal subjects had a unimodal distribution curve. All patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy demonstrated asymmetric septal hypertrophy, a decreased systolic septal thickening of less than 25 percent and a characteristic left ventricular shape in the cross-sectional echocardiogram. The ventricular septal to posterior wall ratios in their 116 relatives had a bimodal distribution curve; in 35 relatives the ratio indicated asymmetric septal hypertrophy and in 81 the ratio was normal. In addition, all 35 relatives with echocardiographic evidence of asymmetric septal hypertrophy had decreased systolic septal thickening (less than 25 percent) and in 17 the echocardiographic left ventricular shape was similar to that in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. In contrast, the 81 relatives who had no asymmetric septal hypertrophy had normal systolic septal thickening and a normal left ventricular shape. The clinical examination, electrocardiogram and chest X-ray film were less sensitive than the echocardiogram in detecting diagnostic abnormalities in the 35 relatives with asymmetric septal hypertrophy.

It is concluded that echocardiographically assessed asymmetric septal hypertrophy can be considered the anatomic marker for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy only when, in addition, a decreased systolic septal thickening and, to a lesser degree, an abnormal left ventricular shape are present. The asymmetric septal hypertrophy in these cases probably represents the anatomic expression of a genetic defect that has an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance. In so-called “borderline” cases with echocardiographic signs of an abnormal ventricular septal to posterior wall ratio, a definitive clinical diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy could be made only after echocardiographic screening of family members for the presence of asymmetric septal hypertrophy.

References (12)

  • J.B Seward et al.

    Peripheral venous contrast echocardiography

    Am J Cardiol

    (1977)
  • J Goodwin et al.

    Clinical aspects of cardiomyopathies

    Br Med J

    (1961)
  • E Braunwald et al.

    Idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis: clinical, hemodynamic and angiographic manifestations

    Am J Med

    (1960)
  • C.E Clark et al.

    Familial prevalence and genetic transmission of idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis

    N Engl J Med

    (1973)
  • W.G Van Dorp et al.

    Familial prevalence of asymmetric septal hypertrophy

    Eur J Cardiol

    (1976)
  • W.E Larter et al.

    The asymmetrically hypertrophied septum. Further differentiation of its causes

    Circulation

    (1976)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (29)

  • Subendocardial motion in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Assessment from long- and short-axis views by pulsed tissue doppler imaging

    2000, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
    Citation Excerpt :

    Although some experimental studies27-29 have shown systolic dysfunction in patients with LV hypertrophy from an observation of depressed myocardial fiber shortening, few clinical studies have confirmed this finding.15,30,31 Overall LV pump function in patients with HC was judged normal in early studies that used M-mode echocardiography4,5 because hyperkinesis in the LV PW compensated for hypokinesis in the IVS. However, in the M-mode echocardiogram, the posterior movement of the IVS is underestimated and the anterior movement of the LV PW is overestimated because of anterior translation of the whole heart.

  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

    1994, Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases
  • More on death in the opera

    1993, The American Journal of Cardiology
  • Human lymphocyte antigens in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

    1986, International Journal of Cardiology
  • Genetic heterogeneity of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

    1985, International Journal of Cardiology
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text