Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Significant association between Nijmegen breakage syndrome 1 657del5 polymorphism and breast cancer risk

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Tumor Biology

Abstract

Many studies were published to evaluate the association between Nijmegen breakage syndrome 1 (NBS1) 657del5 polymorphism and breast cancer risk, but the results remained inconsistent. To derive a more precise estimation on the possible association, we performed a meta-analysis of previous published studies. Case–control studies on the association between NBS1 657del5 polymorphisms and breast cancer risk were included into this meta-analysis. We used the odds ratio (OR) with 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) to assess the strength of the association. Ten studies with a total of 25,365 subjects were identified and included into this meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of those ten studies showed that there was a significant association between NBS1 657del5 polymorphisms and breast cancer risk (pooled OR = 2.66, 95 % CI 1.82–3.90, P < 0.001). The cumulative meta-analyses showed a trend of a more significant association between NBS1 657del5 polymorphisms and breast cancer risk as data accumulated by publication year. Thus, our meta-analysis suggests that there was a significant association between NBS1 657del5 polymorphisms and breast cancer risk, and NBS1 657del5 polymorphism results in an increased risk of breast cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cuzick J, DeCensi A, Arun B, Brown PH, Castiglione M, Dunn B, et al. Preventive therapy for breast cancer: a consensus statement. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:496–503.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Higgins MJ, Baselga J. Breast cancer in 2010: novel targets and therapies for a personalized approach. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011;8:65–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Foulkes WD, Smith IE, Reis-Filho JS. Triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1938–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Reis-Filho JS, Pusztai L. Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: classification, prognostication, and prediction. Lancet. 2011;378:1812–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tauchi H, Matsuura S, Kobayashi J, Sakamoto S, Komatsu K. Nijmegen breakage syndrome gene, NBS1, and molecular links to factors for genome stability. Oncogene. 2002;21:8967–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Huang J, Grotzer MA, Watanabe T, Hewer E, Pietsch T, Rutkowski S, et al. Mutations in the Nijmegen breakage syndrome gene in medulloblastomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:4053–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Maser RS, Zinkel R, Petrini JH. An alternative mode of translation permits production of a variant NBS1 protein from the common Nijmegen breakage syndrome allele. Nat Genet. 2001;27:417–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Carlomagno F, Chang-Claude J, Dunning AM, Ponder BA. Determination of the frequency of the common 657del5 Nijmegen breakage syndrome mutation in the German population: no association with risk of breast cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1999;25:393–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gorski B, Debniak T, Masojc B, Mierzejewski M, Medrek K, Cybulski C, et al. Germline 657del5 mutation in the NBS1 gene in breast cancer patients. Int J Cancer. 2003;106:379–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Buslov KG, Iyevleva AG, Chekmariova EV, Suspitsin EN, Togo AV, Kuligina E, et al. NBS1 657del5 mutation may contribute only to a limited fraction of breast cancer cases in Russia. Int J Cancer. 2005;114:585–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gorski B, Cybulski C, Huzarski T, Byrski T, Gronwald J, Jakubowska A, et al. Breast cancer predisposing alleles in Poland. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;92:19–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kanka C, Brozek I, Skalska B, Siemiatkowska A, Limon J. Germline NBS1 mutations in families with aggregation of breast and/or ovarian cancer from north-east Poland. Anticancer Res. 2007;27:3015–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Roznowski K, Januszkiewicz-Lewandowska D, Mosor M, Pernak M, Litwiniuk M, Nowak J. I171V germline mutation in the NBS1 gene significantly increases risk of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;110:343–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mateju M, Kleiblova P, Kleibl Z, Janatova M, Soukupova J, Ticha I, et al. Germline mutations 657del5 and 643C>T (R215W) in NBN are not likely to be associated with increased risk of breast cancer in Czech women. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;133:809–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959;22:719–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Doubilet P, Weinstein MC, McNeil BJ. Use and misuse of the term “cost effective” in medicine. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:253–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zintzaras E, Lau J. Synthesis of genetic association studies for pertinent gene–disease associations requires appropriate methodological and statistical approaches. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:634–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Muellerleile P, Mullen B. Sufficiency and stability of evidence for public health interventions using cumulative meta-analysis. Am J Public Health. 2006;96:515–22.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315:629–34.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Steffen J, Varon R, Mosor M, Maneva G, Maurer M, Stumm M, et al. Increased cancer risk of heterozygotes with NBS1 germline mutations in Poland. Int J Cancer. 2004;111:67–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Steffen J, Nowakowska D, Niwinska A, Czapczak D, Kluska A, Piatkowska M, et al. Germline mutations 657del5 of the NBS1 gene contribute significantly to the incidence of breast cancer in Central Poland. Int J Cancer. 2006;119:472–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bogdanova N, Feshchenko S, Schurmann P, Waltes R, Wieland B, Hillemanns P, et al. Nijmegen breakage syndrome mutations and risk of breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2008;122:802–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang Y, Zhou J, Lim CU. The role of NBS1 in DNA double strand break repair, telomere stability, and cell cycle checkpoint control. Cell Res. 2006;16:45–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Thompson LH. Recognition, signaling, and repair of DNA double-strand breaks produced by ionizing radiation in mammalian cells: the molecular choreography. Mutat Res. 2012;751:158–246.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kondratenko I, Paschenko O, Polyakov A, Bologov A. Nijmegen breakage syndrome. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2007;601:61–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. van der Groep P, van der Wall E, van Diest PJ. Pathology of hereditary breast cancer. Cell Oncol (Dordr). 2011;34:71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dodson GE, Limbo O, Nieto D, Russell P. Phosphorylation-regulated binding of CTP1 to NBS1 is critical for repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Cell Cycle. 2010;9:1516–22.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None of the authors have any conflict of interests to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guofeng Zhang.

Additional information

Guofeng Zhang and Yu Zeng contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, G., Zeng, Y., Liu, Z. et al. Significant association between Nijmegen breakage syndrome 1 657del5 polymorphism and breast cancer risk. Tumor Biol. 34, 2753–2757 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-013-0830-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-013-0830-z

Keywords

Navigation