Skip to main content
Log in

Which aspects of processing text mediate genetic effects?

  • Part One: Genetics
  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Genetic influences on reading are investigated in a sample of 285, 13 year old twins. Using a multiple regression procedure, the heritability of disability (h 2g ) for Reading Recognition was found to be non-significant. However the h 2g for spelling disability was found to be 0.58 (P<0.05), after controlling for individual differences in IQ. The twins in this study were an unselected sample from the general population. Therefore it was possible to estimate h 2g for differing degrees of severity of disability. These analyses showed that for spelling but not for Reading Recognition or Reading Composite, there were substantial genetic contributions to all levels of disability. For indices of Orthographic Coding there were no significant values of h 2g . In contrast measures of Phonological Coding and Homophone Recognition have consistently high values of h 2g . More detailed analyses suggested that there were possibly two independent aspects of phonological ability, each influenced by genetic factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bakwin H. 1973. Reading disability in twins. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 15, 184–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron J. 1977. Mechanisms for pronoucing printed words: use and acquisition. In D. LaBerge and S. J. Samuels (eds.), Basic processes in reading: perception and comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ. Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron J. 1985. Back to basics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart M. 1978. Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (ed.), Strategies of information processing. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M. 1981. Analysing acquired disorders. Unpublished paper. Birkbeck College, University of London.

  • DeFries J. C. 1988. Colorado Reading Project: longitudinal analyses. Annals of Dyslexia, 38, 120–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFries J. C., Fulker D. W. and LaBuda M. C. 1987. Evidence for a genetic aetiology in reading disability of twins. Nature, 329, 537–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFries J. C. and Fulker D. W. 1985. Multiple regression analysis of twin data. Behaviour Genetics, 15, 467–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFries J. C. and Fulker D. W. 1988. Multiple regression analysis of twin data: Etiology of deviant scores versus individual differences. Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae, 37, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri L. C. 1989. The development of spelling knowledge and its role in reading acquisition and reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 356–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredman G. and Stevenson J. 1988. Reading processes in specific reading retarded and reading backward 13 year olds. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6, 97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith U. 1985. Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. Patterson, J. C. Marshall and M. Coltheart (eds.), Surface dyslexia: neuropsychological studies of phonological reading. London. Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham P. and Stevenson J. 1985. A twin study of genetic influences on behavioral deviance. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 24, 23–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami U. and Bryant P. 1990. Phonological skills and learning to read. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris E. L. 1986. The contribution of twin research to the study of the etiology of reading disability. In S. D. Smith (ed.), Genetics and learning disabilities (pp. 3–20). London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay D. A., O'Brien P. J. Johnston C. J. and Prior M. 1984. The high incidence of reading disability in twin boys and its implications for genetic analyses. Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae: Twin Research, 33, 223–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson L. 1982. Orthography and word recognition in reading. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys G. W. and Evett L. J. 1985. Are there independent lexical and nonlexical routes in word processing? An evaluation of the dual-route theory of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 689–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcel A. 1980. Surface dyslexia and beginning reading: a revised hypothesis of the pronunciation of print and its impairments. In M. Coltheart, K. E. Patterson and J. C. Marshall (eds.), Deep dyslexia. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale M. D. 1967. Neale Analysis of Reading Ability Manual. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R. K., Gillis, J. J., Rack, J. P., DeFries, J. C. and Fulker, D. W. 1991. Confirmatory factor analysis of word recognition and process measures in the Colorado Reading Project. Reading and Writing (this issue).

  • Olson, R. K. and Rack, J. 1990. Genetic and environmental influences on component reading and language skills. Paper presented at the Rodin Remediation Scientific Conference “Genetic and environmental influences on dyslexia”, Boulder, Colorado, U.S.A., 19–21 September 1990.

  • Olson R., Wise B., Conners F., Rack J. and Fulker D. 1989. Specific deficits in component reading and language skills: genetic and environmental influences. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 339–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson K., Seidenberg M. S. and McClelland J. L. 1989. Connections and disconnections: acquired dyslexia in a computational model of reading processes. In R. G. M. Morris (ed.), Parallel distributed modelling: implications for psychology and neurobiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plomin R. and Loehlin J. C. 1989. Direct and indirect heritability estimates: a puzzle. Behavior Genetics, 19, 331–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schonell F. J. and Schonell P. E. 1960. Diagnostic and attainment testing. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg M. S. and McClelland J. L. 1987. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shallice T. and McCarthy R. 1985. Phonological reading: from patterns of impairment to possible procedures. In K. Patterson, J. C. Marshall and M. Coltheart (eds.), Surface dyslexia: neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel L. S. 1989. IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 469–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. D., Pennington, B. F., Kimberling, W. J., Fain, P. R., Ing, P. S., and Lubs, H. A. (in press). Linkage analysis between specific reading disability and three markers on chromosome 15: evidence for genetic heterogeneity. American Journal of Genetics.

  • Stanovich K. 1988. Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11, 590–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, J. (in press) Genetics. In N. N. Singh and I. I. Beale (eds) Current perspectives in learning disabilities: nature, theory and treatment. New York. Springer-Verlag.

  • Stevenson J. and Fredman G. 1990. The social environment correlates of reading ability. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 31, 681–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson J., Graham P., Fredman G. and McLoughlin V. 1987. A twin study of genetic influences on reading and spelling and ability and disability. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 28, 283–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson J. S. and Thompson M. W. 1986. Genetics in medicine. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen J. K. 1989. Why IQ is relevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 484–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman R., Freyd J. J. and Baron J. 1983. Phonological recoding and use of spelling sound rules in reading sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 22, 682–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Orden, G. C., Pennington, B. F. and Stone, G. O. (in press) Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review.

  • Wagner R. K. and Torgesen J. K. 1987. The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler D. 1974. Examiner's manual: Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerbin-Rudin E. 1967. Congenital word blindness. Bulletin of the Orton Society, 17, 47–54.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stevenson, J. Which aspects of processing text mediate genetic effects?. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 3, 249–269 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00354961

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00354961

Keywords

Navigation