Table 1

 Comparison of 5′ splice sites

−3−2−1+1+2+3+4+5+6SSΔGMAXMDDMMNN
SS, Shapiro and Senapathy matrix;
ΔG, RNA duplex stability with U1 snRNA. (Turner energy rules: www.bioinfo.rpi.edu/∼zukerm/rna/energy)15;
MAX, Maximum entropy model;
MDD, Maximum dependence decomposition model;
MM, First order Markov model. (http://genes.mit.edu/burgelab/maxent/Xmaxentscan_scoreseq.html)16;
NN, Neural network splice site prediction. (www.fruitfly.org/seq_tools/splice).17
Authentic IIIc CAGgtatat75.39−8.87.8811.587.240.88
1084+3A→G CAGgtgtat72.25−8.53.098.483.930.19
Cryptic IIIc CGGgtaatt78.71−9.36.799.785.970.84
Mutant cryptic IIIc CAGgtaatt86.21−9.78.5513.087.720.87
Authentic IIIb AAGgtaaca80.10−7.98.9212.686.990.94
U1 snRNA 3′-GUCCAUUCA-5′