Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Age- and tissue-specific variation of X chromosome inactivation ratios in normal women

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Human Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

The incidence of skewed X-inactivation in normal women is controversial, with up to 10-fold differences being reported by different authors. In order to clarify this issue, we have conducted a survey of the X-inactivation patterns in 270 informative females from various age groups, using the androgen receptor gene/polymerase chain reaction assay. Results obtained by using DNA extracted from blood samples show that the incidence of severe skewing (defined here as ratios ≥90:10) is relatively common and increases with age (P<0.05), occurring in 7% of women under 25 years of age, and 16% of women over 60. In order to study tissue-specific patterns of X-inactivation, samples of both buccal and urinary epithelia were also obtained from 88 of the females studied. Although there was a significant association of the X-inactivation ratios between each tissue in most individuals, wide variations were apparent in some cases, making accurate extrapolations between tissues impossible. The degree of correlation between each tissue also fell markedly with age. Our data are consistent with the hypothesis that the major factors in the aetiology of skewed X-inactivation are secondary selection processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Electronic Publication

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharp, A., Robinson, D. & Jacobs, P. Age- and tissue-specific variation of X chromosome inactivation ratios in normal women. Hum Genet 107, 343–349 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004390000382

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004390000382

Keywords

Navigation