Background The effect of complex alleles in cystic fibrosis (CF) is poorly defined for the lack of functional studies.
Objectives To describe the genotype–phenotype correlation and the results of either in vitro and ex vivo studies performed on nasal epithelial cells (NEC) in a cohort of patients with CF carrying cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) complex alleles.
Methods We studied 70 homozygous, compound heterozygous or heterozygous for CFTR mutations: p.[Arg74Trp;Val201Met;Asp1270Asn], n=8; p.[Ile148Thr;Ile1023_Val1024del], n=5; p.[Arg117Leu;Leu997Phe], n=6; c.[1210-34TG;1210-12T;2930C>T], n=3; p.[Arg74Trp;Asp1270Asn], n=4; p.Asp1270Asn, n=2; p.Ile148Thr, n=6; p.Leu997Phe, n=36. In 39 patients, we analysed the CFTR gating activity on NEC in comparison with patients with CF (n=8) and carriers (n=4). Finally, we analysed in vitro the p.[Arg74Trp;Val201Met;Asp1270Asn] complex allele.
Results The p.[Ile148Thr;Ile1023_Val1024del] caused severe CF in five compound heterozygous with a class I–II mutation. Their CFTR activity on NEC was comparable with patients with two class I–II mutations (mean 7.3% vs 6.9%). The p.[Arg74Trp;Asp1270Asn] and the p.Asp1270Asn have scarce functional effects, while p.[Arg74Trp;Val201Met;Asp1270Asn] caused mild CF in four of five subjects carrying a class I–II mutation in trans, or CFTR-related disorders (CFTR-RD) in three having in trans a class IV–V mutation. The p.[Arg74Trp;Val201Met;Asp1270Asn] causes significantly (p<0.001) higher CFTR activity compared with compound heterozygous for class I–II mutations. Furthermore, five of six compounds heterozygous with the p.[Arg117Leu;Leu997Phe] had mild CF, whereas the p.Leu997Phe, in trans with a class I–II CFTR mutation, caused CFTR-RD or a healthy status (CFTR activity: 21.3–36.9%). Finally, compounds heterozygous for the c.[1210-34TG;1210-12T;2930C>T] and a class I–II mutation had mild CF or CFTR-RD (gating activity: 18.5–19.0%).
Conclusions The effect of complex alleles partially depends on the mutation in trans. Although larger studies are necessary, the CFTR activity on NEC is a rapid contributory tool to classify patients with CFTR dysfunction.
- nasal brushing
- gating activity
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Contributors VT, GC and FA conceived and designed the study, interpreted data and wrote the paper; DS and ML recruited patients and contributed to manuscript preparation; VR, AA, VC, NC, RC, CC, PI, VL, SQ, MS and VMS recruited patients; AMDL, AE, MC, MC, AP, RC and FZ analysed the CFTR gating activity on nasal epithelial cells and described the results of either in vitro and ex vivo studies. All authors approved the ﬁnal manuscript.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent Obtained.
Ethics approval Ethical committee of the University of Naples Federico II.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.