Article Text

PDF
Epigenetic signatures of Silver–Russell syndrome
  1. Sayeda Abu-Amero1,
  2. Emma L Wakeling2,
  3. Mike Preece1,
  4. John Whittaker3,
  5. Philip Stanier1,
  6. Gudrun E Moore1
  1. 1Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
  2. 2The North West London Hospitals NHS Trust, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, UK
  3. 3Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Sayeda Abu-Amero, Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK; s.abu-amero{at}ich.ucl.ac.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Silver–Russell syndrome (SRS) (OMIM 180860) has been recognised as a clinical entity since the 1950s; however, a molecular genetic cause remained unknown until 1997 when maternal uniparental disomy for chromosome 7 (mUPD7) was found in approximately 10% of affected individuals. The focus then turned to the identification of causative imprinted genes on chromosome 7. Over the next 10 years many of the potential candidate genes identified on chromosome 7 as well as many imprinted loci elsewhere were excluded.1–13 However, in 2006, Gicquel et al identified a major role in the aetiology of SRS for the chromosome 11p15.5 region.14–16 This work, and a succession of comparative, detailed and confirmatory studies, demonstrated an epigenetic signature of hypomethylation at the 11p15.5 imprinting control region 1 (ICR1) in 30–60% of SRS probands (table 1). Here the H19 differentially methylated domain (H19 DMD) regulates the methylation and therefore respective maternal or paternal expression of H19 and insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF2) genes.

View this table:
Table 1

Summary of literature on hypomethylation status in SRS patients

Hypomethylation at ICR1 causes epigenetic dysregulation of H19 and IGF2, ultimately resulting in reduced expression of IGF2 and potentially phenotypic growth restriction. Interestingly, the degree of hypomethylation was also found to correlate with the severity of the growth phenotype as well as additional SRS diagnostic features. In comparison, patients with mUPD7 were clinically distinguishable displaying a noticeably milder phenotype.

Since then, the literature includes a number of detailed clinical evaluations with the aim of developing a clinical scoring system to help characterise specific subgroups of SRS caused by mUPD7, hypomethylation of 11p15.5 or those with an …

View Full Text

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.