Article Text

PDF
Effect of CHEK2 missense variant I157T on the risk of breast cancer in carriers of other CHEK2 or BRCA1 mutations
  1. C Cybulski1,
  2. B Górski1,
  3. T Huzarski1,
  4. T Byrski1,
  5. J Gronwald1,
  6. T Dębniak1,
  7. D Wokołorczyk1,
  8. A Jakubowska1,
  9. P Serrano-Fernández1,
  10. T Dork2,
  11. S A Narod3,
  12. J Lubiński1
  1. 1
    International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
  2. 2
    Clinics of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
  3. 3
    Women’s College Research Institute, Toronto Ontario, Canada
  1. Dr C Cybulski, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, ul. Połabska 4, 70–115 Szczecin, Poland; cezarycy{at}sci.pam.szczecin.pl

Abstract

Background: Carriers of heterozygous mutations in CHEK2 or BRCA1 are at increased risk of breast cancer. These mutations are rare and a very small number of women in a population will carry two mutations. However, it is of interest to estimate the breast cancer risks associated with carrying two mutations because this information may be informative for genetic counsellors and may provide clues to the carcinogenic process.

Methods: We genotyped 7782 Polish breast cancer patients and 6233 controls for seven founder mutations in BRCA1 and CHEK2. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated for the mutations, singly and in combination.

Results: Of the 7782 women with breast cancer, 1091 had one mutation (14.0%) and 37 had two mutations (0.5%). Compared to controls, the odds ratio for a BRCA1 mutation in isolation was 13.1 (95% CI 8.2 to 21). The odds ratio was smaller for BRCA1 mutation carriers who also carried a CHEK2 mutation (OR 6.6, 95% CI 1.5 to 29), but the difference was not statistically significant. In contrast, the odds ratio for women who carried two CHEK2 mutations (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.5 to 10) was greater than that for women who carried one CHEK2 mutation (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.6 to 2.1). The odds ratio for women who carried both a truncating mutation and the missense mutation in CHEK2 was 7.0 (95% CI 0.9 to 56) and was greater than for women who carried the truncating mutation alone (OR 3.3, 95% CI 2.4 to 4.3) or the missense mutation alone (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.4 to 1.9), but the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusion: Our study suggests that the risk of breast cancer in carriers of a deleterious CHEK2 mutation is increased if the second allele is the I157T missense variant. However, the presence of a CHEK2 mutation in women with a BRCA1 mutation may not increase their risk beyond that of the BRCA1 mutation alone. These suggestive findings need to be verified in other studies.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding: The study was supported by Polish Scientific Committee grant PBZ-KBN-122/PO5/2004

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Ethics approval: The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin.

  • Patient consent: Obtained.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.