rss
J Med Genet 2009;46:721-729 doi:10.1136/jmg.2009.066068
  • Review

Encephalocraniocutaneous lipomatosis

  1. U Moog
  1. Institute of Human Genetics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
  1. Correspondence to Dr U Moog, Institute of Human Genetics, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 366, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; ute.moog{at}med.uni-heidelberg.de
  • Received 6 January 2009
  • Revised 20 April 2009
  • Accepted 29 April 2009
  • Published Online First 1 July 2009

Abstract

Background: Encephalocraniocutaneous lipomatosis (ECCL) is a sporadically occurring neurocutaneous disorder of unknown aetiology. It has repeatedly been discussed as a localised form of Proteus syndrome. In 2006, the first large series of patients was reported, and diagnostic criteria were proposed.

Aims: To better define the phenotypic spectrum and natural history of ECCL and to revise diagnostic criteria.

Methods: 54 patients with ECCL were reviewed.

Results: Eye anomalies (mainly choristomas) and skin lesions (non-scarring alopecia, naevus psiloliparus, subcutaneous fatty masses, nodular skin tags, aplastic scalp defects) may be unilateral or bilateral and occur in a consistent pattern. Central nervous system anomalies consist of intracranial and intraspinal lipomas, congenital abnormalities of the meninges, and putative focal vascular defects resulting in highly asymmetrical changes. About two-thirds of patients have a normal development or mild retardation only, and half of them have seizures. No correlation between the extent of central nervous system anomalies and neurological features could be established. Aortic coarctation, progressive bone cysts and jaw tumours may be associated.

Conclusions: Revised diagnostic criteria are proposed. ECCL is considered to differ from Proteus syndrome in particular, but oculoectodermal syndrome is possibly a mild variant. Pathogenetically, mosaicism for a mutated autosomal gene involved in multiple mesenchymal tumours and vasculogenesis, with or without a second hit event, is discussed.

Footnotes

  • ‣ An additional table is published online only at http://jmg.bmj.com/content/vol46/issue11

  • Competing interests None.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and Peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Register for free content


Free trial
Individuals may register for a free 30 day online trial to all content.

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.