Article Text

Cryptic deletions are a common finding in “balanced” reciprocal and complex chromosome rearrangements: a study of 59 patients
  1. M De Gregori1,
  2. R Ciccone1,
  3. P Magini1,
  4. T Pramparo1,
  5. S Gimelli1,
  6. J Messa1,
  7. F Novara1,
  8. A Vetro1,
  9. E Rossi1,
  10. P Maraschio1,2,
  11. M C Bonaglia3,
  12. C Anichini4,
  13. G B Ferrero5,
  14. M Silengo5,
  15. E Fazzi6,
  16. A Zatterale7,
  17. R Fischetto8,
  18. C Previderé9,
  19. S Belli10,
  20. A Turci11,
  21. G Calabrese12,
  22. F Bernardi13,
  23. E Meneghelli13,
  24. M Riegel14,
  25. M Rocchi15,
  26. S Guerneri16,
  27. F Lalatta16,
  28. L Zelante17,
  29. C Romano18,
  30. M Fichera18,
  31. T Mattina19,
  32. G Arrigo20,
  33. M Zollino21,
  34. S Giglio22,
  35. F Lonardo23,
  36. A Bonfante24,
  37. A Ferlini25,
  38. F Cifuentes26,
  39. H Van Esch27,
  40. L Backx27,
  41. A Schinzel14,
  42. J R Vermeesch27,
  43. O Zuffardi1,2
  1. 1
    Biologia Generale e Genetica Medica, Universitè di Pavia, Pavia, Italy
  2. 2
    IRCSS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
  3. 3
    IRCCS E. Medea, Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy
  4. 4
    Pediatria, Universitè di Siena, Siena, Italy
  5. 5
    Dipartimento di Scienze Pediatriche, Universita’ di Torino, Torino, Italy
  6. 6
    IRCCS C. Mondino, Universitè di Pavia, Pavia
  7. 7
    Servizio di Citogenetica ASL-NA1, Napoli, Italy
  8. 8
    Azienda Ospedaliera di Venere-Giovanni XXIII, Bari, Italy;
  9. 9
    Dipartimento di Medicina Legale e Sanitè Pubblica, Universitè di Pavia, Pavia, Italy
  10. 10
    Consultorio Genetico, Trento, Italy
  11. 11
    Citogenetica, Ospedale di Ravenna, Ravenna, Italy
  12. 12
    Genetica Medica, Universitè di Chieti, Chieti, Italy
  13. 13
    Patologia Genetica e Prenatale, Policlinico G.B. Rossi, Verona, Italy
  14. 14
    Institute of Medical Genetics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  15. 15
    Dip. di Genetica e Microbiologia, Universitè di Bari, Bari, Italy
  16. 16
    Fondazione Ospedale Maggiore, Mangiagalli e Regina Elena, Milano, Italy
  17. 17
    Servizio Genetica Medica, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni rotondo, Italy
  18. 18
    Oasi Institute for Research on Mental Retardation and Brain Aging, Troina, Italy
  19. 19
    Genetica Medica, Universitè di Catania, Catania, Italy
  20. 20
    Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy
  21. 21
    Istituto di Genetica Medica, Policlinico A. Gemelli, UCSC, Roma, Italy
  22. 22
    Ospedale Pediatrico Meyer, Firenze, Italy
  23. 23
    Azienda Ospedaliera G. Rummo, Benevento, Italy
  24. 24
    24 Genetica Medica, Ospedale San Bassiano, Bassano del Grappa, Italy
  25. 25
    Genetica Medica, Universitè di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
  26. 26
    Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, California, USA
  27. 27
    Center for Human Genetics, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
  1. O Zuffardi, Dipartimento di Patologia Umana ed Ereditaria, Sezione Biologia Generale e Genetica Medica, via forlanini 14, 27100 Pavia; zuffardi{at}unipv.it

Abstract

Using array comparative genome hybridisation (CGH) 41 de novo reciprocal translocations and 18 de novo complex chromosome rearrangements (CCRs) were screened. All cases had been interpreted as “balanced” by conventional cytogenetics. In all, 27 cases of reciprocal translocations were detected in patients with an abnormal phenotype, and after array CGH analysis, 11 were found to be unbalanced. Thus 40% (11 of 27) of patients with a “chromosomal phenotype” and an apparently balanced translocation were in fact unbalanced, and 18% (5 of 27) of the reciprocal translocations were instead complex rearrangements with >3 breakpoints. Fourteen fetuses with de novo, apparently balanced translocations, all but two with normal ultrasound findings, were also analysed and all were found to be normal using array CGH. Thirteen CCRs were detected in patients with abnormal phenotypes, two in women who had experienced repeated spontaneous abortions and three in fetuses. Sixteen patients were found to have unbalanced mutations, with up to 4 deletions. These results suggest that genome-wide array CGH may be advisable in all carriers of “balanced” CCRs. The parental origin of the deletions was investigated in 5 reciprocal translocations and 11 CCRs; all were found to be paternal. Using customised platforms in seven cases of CCRs, the deletion breakpoints were narrowed down to regions of a few hundred base pairs in length. No susceptibility motifs were associated with the imbalances. These results show that the phenotypic abnormalities of apparently balanced de novo CCRs are mainly due to cryptic deletions and that spermatogenesis is more prone to generate multiple chaotic chromosome imbalances and reciprocal translocations than oogenesis.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Supplementary materials

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: none declared.

  • Abbreviations:
    BAC
    bacterial artificial chromosome
    CCR
    complex chromosome rearrangement
    CGH
    comparative genome hybridisation
    DMD
    Duchenne muscular dystrophy
    DSB
    double-strand break
    FISH
    flurorescence in situ hybridisation
    PATRR
    aplindromic AT-rich repeat
    STR
    short tandem repeat