rss
J Med Genet 2004;41:492-507 doi:10.1136/jmg.2003.015867
  • Original article

Analysis of missense variation in human BRCA1 in the context of interspecific sequence variation

  1. V Abkevich,
  2. A Zharkikh,
  3. A M Deffenbaugh,
  4. D Frank,
  5. Y Chen,
  6. D Shattuck,
  7. M H Skolnick,
  8. A Gutin,
  9. S V Tavtigian
  1. Myriad Genetics, Inc; 320 Wakara Way; Salt Lake City, UT, 84108; USA
  1. Correspondence to:
 S V Tavtigian PhD
 International Agency for Research on Cancer, 69372 Lyon Cedex 08, France; tavtigianiarc.fr
  • Accepted 19 December 2003
  • Revised 18 December 2003

Abstract

Introduction: Interpretation of results from mutation screening of tumour suppressor genes known to harbour high risk susceptibility mutations, such as APC, BRCA1, BRCA2, MLH1, MSH2, TP53, and PTEN, is becoming an increasingly important part of clinical practice. Interpretation of truncating mutations, gene rearrangements, and obvious splice junction mutations, is generally straightforward. However, classification of missense variants often presents a difficult problem. From a series of 20 000 full sequence tests of BRCA1 carried out at Myriad Genetic Laboratories, a total of 314 different missense changes and eight in-frame deletions were observed. Before this study, only 21 of these missense changes were classified as deleterious or suspected deleterious and 14 as neutral or of little clinical significance.

Methods: We have used a combination of a multiple sequence alignment of orthologous BRCA1 sequences and a measure of the chemical difference between the amino acids present at individual residues in the sequence alignment to classify missense variants and in-frame deletions detected during mutation screening of BRCA1.

Results: In the present analysis we were able to classify an additional 50 missense variants and two in-frame deletions as probably deleterious and 92 missense variants as probably neutral. Thus we have tentatively classified about 50% of the unclassified missense variants observed during clinical testing of BRCA1.

Discussion: An internal test of the analysis is consistent with our classification of the variants designated probably deleterious; however, we must stress that this classification is tentative and does not have sufficient independent confirmation to serve as a clinically applicable stand alone method.

Footnotes

  • Conflict of interest: most of the authors are employees of Myriad Genetics, Inc. This manuscript bears on their commercial test for mutations in BRCA1.

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.