Statistics from Altmetric.com
In the July 2000 issue of the journal (J Med Genet 2000;37:e7), in the electronic letter by Montera et al, two mutations were wrongly described in table 3. For patient F102, the mutation should have read hMLH1 IVS7 −2 a→g, out of frame del exon 8. For patient CA135, it should have read hMSH2 400 ins CA, nonsense.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.