Background and objectives: Locus heterogeneity is well established in autosomal recessive primary microcephaly (MCPH) and to date five loci have been mapped. However, the relative contributions of these loci have not been assessed and genotype-phenotype correlations have not been investigated.
Design: A study population of 56 consanguineous families resident in or originating from northern Pakistan was ascertained and assessed by the authors. A panel of microsatellite markers spanning each of the MCPH loci was designed, against which the families were genotyped.
Results: The head circumference of the 131 affected subjects ranged from 4 to 14 SD below the mean, but there was little intrafamilial variation among affecteds (± 1 SD). MCPH5 was the most prevalent, with 24/56 families consistent with linkage; 2/56 families were compatible with linkage to MCPH1, 10/56 to MCPH2, 2/56 to MCPH3, none to MCPH4, and 18/56 did not segregate with any of the loci.
Conclusions: MCPH5 is the most common locus in this population. On clinical grounds alone, the phenotype of families linked to each MCPH locus could not be distinguished. We have also shown that further MCPH loci await discovery with a number of families as yet unlinked.
- autosomal recessive primary microcephaly (MCPH)
- mental retardation
- cerebral cortex
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Autosomal recessive primary microcephaly (MCPH) is a rare human disorder in which the cerebral cortex is reduced in size and, as a consequence, the head circumference is reduced.12 MCPH appears to arise through failure of a normal developmental process and not regression or degeneration of established neuronal tissue. The consequence of the disorder is mild to moderate mental retardation without other neurological deficit.3 In this study, we defined MCPH as: a congenital disorder in which an affected subject has microcephaly of at least –4 SD (measured as occipitofrontal head circumference and corrected for age and sex), and mild/moderate mental retardation, in the absence of any generalised disorder of growth, abnormal neurological findings, fits, or dysmorphic features and in which other syndromic, neurological, chromosomal, metabolic, and maternal/environmental diagnoses were sought and eliminated. When performed, brain neuroimaging showed that the cerebral cortex is small and symmetrical, other areas of the brain are of normal size, and there are no structural anomalies or evidence of abnormal neuronal migration.1
While MCPH apparently has a single clinical phenotype, it exhibits genetic heterogeneity.2 We had previously used four of the study families to identify MCPH gene loci using autozygosity mapping4: MCPH1 (family 18), MCPH2 (family 27), MCPH3 (family 1), and MCPH5 (family 38).5–9 A further locus, MCPH4, was found by Jamieson et al10 in a consanguineous Turkish family.10 To date, no MCPH gene has been published (see note added in proof).
The aims of this study were threefold: firstly, to document the phenotype of a large number of subjects affected with MCPH, secondly, to determine the relative frequency of each of the five MCPH loci within one ethnic population, and, thirdly, to use the genotype data to seek interlocus and intralocus phenotype differences.
Fifty-six consanguineous families of northern Pakistani origin containing one or more members with MCPH were ascertained. Families were referred to the authors from two sources: from paediatricians in Yorkshire, UK (serving a large northern Pakistani population centred upon Bradford) and from paediatricians and Special Schools in Rawalpindi, Islamabad, and Lahore in Pakistan (which is the geographical origin of the majority of Asians in Yorkshire). One of the authors obtained a medical history and family pedigree and examined all potentially affected subjects. Ethical Committee consent for this study has been given.
Family members gave blood samples from which DNA was obtained by standard methods. For each MCPH locus, a panel of microsatellite markers was devised (table 1). Each of the 56 families was genotyped against the five known MCPH loci using these panels. As all of the families are consanguineous, identity by descent could be sought and used to assess evidence of linkage to a particular locus.11
In the 56 study families, there were 131 MCPH affected members with a male to female ratio of 70:61. Of these families, 20/56 contained affected subjects in more than one sibship, 22/56 were a single sibship with multiple affected subjects, and in 14/56 a single offspring was affected. All affected subjects were microcephalic at birth with a head circumference between –4 and –14 SD (fig 1). In fifteen of them, the degree of microcephaly at birth could be compared to that at 5-10 years of age and no difference was seen, implying that this is not a progressive condition. There was no sex difference in the degree of microcephaly or the gross cognitive ability. Within multiply affected families, head circumferences usually varied only by ± 1 SD. Where there was a greater variation in head circumference, this was confined to older affected members (>30 years of age) of the family, who had a reduced relative head circumference compared to their younger affected family relatives. All study subjects enjoyed good health, comparable to their unaffected family members. All had normal early motor milestones but some had delay in speech (in acquisition of vocabulary and grammar but without dysarthria), none had severe or profound mental retardation, and none had epilepsy. Most were physically able and the majority were personable, biddable, and trainable in life skills. Some had “sloping foreheads”, but within a family this was an inconsistent feature.1 All parents were of normal physical and mental ability and none had microcephaly.
The genotype results are reported in table 2: 2/56 families were consistent with linkage to MCPH1 (4%), 10/56 to MCPH2 (18%), 2/56 to MCPH3 (4%), none to MCPH4, and 24/56 to MCPH5 (43%). In two multi-affected families likely to be linked to MCPH5, a subject was homozygous for a smaller region while carrying the larger family haplotype. We have used these results to refine this locus further. One singleton was homozygous for all markers for both the MCPH2 and MCPH3 loci. In 18/56 families (32%), there was no definite evidence of linkage to one of the five known loci. However, three of these families had affected subjects with a concordant haplotype for MCPH3 markers (that is, the same heterozygous allele results for all polymorphic microsatellite markers assessed) suggesting the possibility of linkage to a smaller homozygous region contained within this haplotype.
Bearing in mind the possibility of a child of first cousin parents carrying a homozygous region by descent rather than as the disease allele is 1 in 16, whereas in multi-affected pedigrees this chance decreases, and that clinical misdiagnosis must always be considered in a “diagnosis of exclusion” such as MCPH, and such phenocopies are more likely in single affected families,3 then, excluding singletons from the analysis, 2/42 families are compatible with linkage to MCPH1 (5%), 6/42 to MCPH2 (14%), 1/42 to MCPH3 (2%), none to MCPH4, 19/42 to MCPH5 (45%), and 14/42 families (33%) did not segregate with any of the loci. This suggests that inclusion of singletons in our analysis was not a major cause of error. All individual head circumferences and the mean for each family were analysed against the MCPH loci genotype data and there was no discernable difference (table 3).
Given the large number of disorders that cause “mental retardation with microcephaly”, it is important from a clinical perspective to attempt to split such a broad phenotypic category into more discrete entities. To this end we report a large cohort of subjects in whom we have made a clinical diagnosis of autosomal recessive primary microcephaly (MCPH). Supporting the definition of MCPH as a clinical neurodevelopmental disorder is both the numbers of cases we have amassed and the fact that genetic linkages for MCPH loci have been identified. We suggest that autosomal recessive primary microcephaly may be a more exact and useful term than others in use, for example, “true microcephaly”, “recessive microcephaly”, or “microcephaly vera”.3 Certainly, in our study population the “true microcephaly” phenotype with the sloping forehead was not a consistent finding in subjects affected with MCPH. It has also been suggested that carriers of MCPH have diminished intelligence as a heterozygote effect,15 though we found no evidence of this.
In conclusion, we suggest that MCPH can be defined as a clinical entity. It was considered that it would exhibit genetic heterogeneity16,17 and this has now been confirmed, with five MCPH loci reported to date.2 We have established the relative incidence of each locus in the northern Pakistani population and that MCPH5 is the most common in this ethnic group. Interestingly, none of our northern Pakistani families link to the MCPH4 locus,10 which was identified in a Turkish population. Following genotyping of the study families, we were unable to differentiate clinically between families linked to the five MCPH loci. We have also shown that further MCPH loci await discovery with a number of families as yet unlinked. It seems likely that determination of the MCPH genes will give valuable insights into normal brain development (and possibly the evolutionary process of encephalisation, where the surface area of the cerebral cortex has tripled in size from primates to man18), as well as providing new therapeutic options for affected families.
NOTE ADDED IN PROOF
The MCPH1 gene has now been identified.19
We thank the families, Professor D T Bishop for helpful discussions concerning the statistical analysis of our data, and the Wellcome Trust who funded this work. The West Riding Fund, Research into Ageing, and the British Heart Foundation also support work in the authors’ laboratory.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.