Article Text

PDF

Fragile X syndrome is less common than previously estimated.
  1. J E Morton,
  2. S Bundey,
  3. T P Webb,
  4. F MacDonald,
  5. P M Rindl,
  6. S Bullock
  1. Clinical Genetics Unit, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Edgbaston, UK.

    Abstract

    In 1986, a population study of school children in the city of Coventry gave an overall prevalence in males and females for fragile X syndrome of 1/952. The 29 children diagnosed as having fragile X syndrome in this study have been re-evaluated with molecular diagnostic techniques. Eighteen of the original 29 children have been found not to have the expansion of the FMR1 gene associated with fragile X syndrome. Revised prevalence figures have been calculated giving rise to an overall prevalence figure of 1/2720 (range 1/2198-1/3089). If the four children lost to follow up are also assumed not to have the fragile X syndrome, the revised prevalence figure was 1/5714 (range 1/4762-1/6349). Clinical review of boys with severe mental retardation from this and a subsidiary study show that the clinical features of head circumference greater than the 50th centile, testicular volume greater than the 50th centile, and IQ between 35 and 70 remain helpful in distinguishing boys with fragile X syndrome from those who have non-specific mental retardation.

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.