Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
To SUBMIT an e-letter please go to the abstract/full text of the article and click the 'Submit a response' link in the box to the right of the text. For further help click here.

Electronic Letters to:

Charis Eng, Lawrence C Brody, Teresa M U Wagner, Peter Devilee, Jan Vijg, Csilla Szabo, Sean V Tavtigian, Katharine L Nathanson, Elaine Ostrander, Thomas S Frank
Interpreting epidemiological research: blinded comparison of methods used to estimate the prevalence of inherited mutations in BRCA1
J Med Genet 2001; 38: 824-833 [Abstract] [Full text] [PDF]
*eLetters: Submit a response to this article

Electronic letters published:

[Read eLetter] Importance of Blinded Comparisons
Carol L. MacLeod   (8 January 2002)

Importance of Blinded Comparisons 8 January 2002
  Top
Carol L. MacLeod,
Professor
UCSD Cancer Center

Send letter to journal:
Re: Importance of Blinded Comparisons

cmacleod{at}ucsd.edu Carol L. MacLeod

Dear Editor

Although I lack expertise in screening methods designed to detect the presence of mutations that predispose to disease, the findings reported on BRCA1 by Eng et al. are clearly important. It is essential that a systematic blinded comparison of methods should be carried out to establish or confirm the validity of genetic screening tests. This is of particular importance in cases where the predisposing risk of cancer associated with the mutations is high and the individuals tested must make important decisions based on the outcome of such tests. Hence, the scientific and medical communities are obliged to assure the accuracy and reliablity of tests offered to identify mutations that carry profound consequences for the individual patient.

Genetics jobs

Genetics jobs