|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
An important aim of genetic risk
counselling is to confirm a level of cancer risk and offer risk
management strategies.1 By giving counsellees accurate
information about their risk, in place of ignorance, uncertainty, or a
false assumption of the inevitability of breast cancer, it is hoped
that some of the associated worry about personal risk may be alleviated.
Earlier work by the authors showed that women frequently
overestimate their risk of breast cancer,2 creating
the possibility of reassuring women by providing a more realistic risk
value. Subsequent research showed that risk counselling significantly improved risk accuracy over a one year follow up period, both for women
who overestimated and underestimated risk.3 This improvement was more likely if women were sent a personal letter containing the risk information after their visit.3
However, there was concern that accurate risk information may induce or increase anxiety in women referred for genetic
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Tyndel, J. Austoker, B. J. Henderson, K. Brain, C. Bankhead, A. Clements, and E. K. Watson What Is the Psychological Impact of Mammographic Screening on Younger Women With a Family History of Breast Cancer? Findings From a Prospective Cohort Study by the PIMMS Management Group J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2007; 25(25): 3823 - 3830. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. van Oostrom, H. Meijers-Heijboer, H. J. Duivenvoorden, A. H. J. T. Brocker-Vriends, C. J. van Asperen, R. H. Sijmons, C. Seynaeve, A. R. Van Gool, J. G. M. Klijn, and A. Tibben Experience of parental cancer in childhood is a risk factor for psychological distress during genetic cancer susceptibility testing Ann. Onc., July 1, 2006; 17(7): 1090 - 1095. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Green, S. K. Peterson, M. W. Baker, G. R. Harper, L. C. Friedman, W. S. Rubinstein, and D. T. Mauger Effect of a Computer-Based Decision Aid on Knowledge, Perceptions, and Intentions About Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer Susceptibility: A Randomized Controlled Trial JAMA, July 28, 2004; 292(4): 442 - 452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Braithwaite, J. Emery, F. Walter, A. T. Prevost, and S. Sutton Psychological Impact of Genetic Counseling for Familial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis J Natl Cancer Inst, January 21, 2004; 96(2): 122 - 133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. van Oostrom, H. Meijers-Heijboer, L. N. Lodder, H. J. Duivenvoorden, A. R. van Gool, C. Seynaeve, C. A. van der Meer, J. G.M. Klijn, B. N. van Geel, C. W. Burger, et al. Long-Term Psychological Impact of Carrying a BRCA1/2 Mutation and Prophylactic Surgery: A 5-Year Follow-Up Study J. Clin. Oncol., October 15, 2003; 21(20): 3867 - 3874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Metcalfe and S. A. Narod Breast Cancer Risk Perception Among Women Who Have Undergone Prophylactic Bilateral Mastectomy J Natl Cancer Inst, October 16, 2002; 94(20): 1564 - 1569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |