J Med Genet

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HOPWOOD, P
Right arrow Articles by HOWELL, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HOPWOOD, P
Right arrow Articles by HOWELL, A
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Oncology
Right arrow Genetics
J Med Genet 2001;38:139 ( February )

Letters to the editor

Risk perception and cancer worry: an exploratory study of the impact of genetic risk counselling in women with a family history of breast cancer

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR---An important aim of genetic risk counselling is to confirm a level of cancer risk and offer risk management strategies.1 By giving counsellees accurate information about their risk, in place of ignorance, uncertainty, or a false assumption of the inevitability of breast cancer, it is hoped that some of the associated worry about personal risk may be alleviated.

Earlier work by the authors showed that women frequently overestimate their risk of breast cancer,2 creating the possibility of reassuring women by providing a more realistic risk value. Subsequent research showed that risk counselling significantly improved risk accuracy over a one year follow up period, both for women who overestimated and underestimated risk.3 This improvement was more likely if women were sent a personal letter containing the risk information after their visit.3 However, there was concern that accurate risk information may induce or increase anxiety in women referred for genetic . . . [Full text of this article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
S. Tyndel, J. Austoker, B. J. Henderson, K. Brain, C. Bankhead, A. Clements, and E. K. Watson
What Is the Psychological Impact of Mammographic Screening on Younger Women With a Family History of Breast Cancer? Findings From a Prospective Cohort Study by the PIMMS Management Group
J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2007; 25(25): 3823 - 3830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
I. van Oostrom, H. Meijers-Heijboer, H. J. Duivenvoorden, A. H. J. T. Brocker-Vriends, C. J. van Asperen, R. H. Sijmons, C. Seynaeve, A. R. Van Gool, J. G. M. Klijn, and A. Tibben
Experience of parental cancer in childhood is a risk factor for psychological distress during genetic cancer susceptibility testing
Ann. Onc., July 1, 2006; 17(7): 1090 - 1095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
M. J. Green, S. K. Peterson, M. W. Baker, G. R. Harper, L. C. Friedman, W. S. Rubinstein, and D. T. Mauger
Effect of a Computer-Based Decision Aid on Knowledge, Perceptions, and Intentions About Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer Susceptibility: A Randomized Controlled Trial
JAMA, July 28, 2004; 292(4): 442 - 452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
D. Braithwaite, J. Emery, F. Walter, A. T. Prevost, and S. Sutton
Psychological Impact of Genetic Counseling for Familial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
J Natl Cancer Inst, January 21, 2004; 96(2): 122 - 133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
I. van Oostrom, H. Meijers-Heijboer, L. N. Lodder, H. J. Duivenvoorden, A. R. van Gool, C. Seynaeve, C. A. van der Meer, J. G.M. Klijn, B. N. van Geel, C. W. Burger, et al.
Long-Term Psychological Impact of Carrying a BRCA1/2 Mutation and Prophylactic Surgery: A 5-Year Follow-Up Study
J. Clin. Oncol., October 15, 2003; 21(20): 3867 - 3874.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
K. A. Metcalfe and S. A. Narod
Breast Cancer Risk Perception Among Women Who Have Undergone Prophylactic Bilateral Mastectomy
J Natl Cancer Inst, October 16, 2002; 94(20): 1564 - 1569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2001 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.