J Med Genet

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

The most recent version of this article was published on 1 August 2008

J Med Genet. Published Online First: 2 May 2008. doi:10.1136/jmg.2008.057984
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jmg.2008.057984v1
45/8/481    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Obler, D.
Right arrow Articles by Natowicz, M. R.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Obler, D.
Right arrow Articles by Natowicz, M. R.

Review article

Double Outlet Right Ventricle: Aetiologies and Associations

Dita Obler 1*, Amy Juraszek 2, Leslie B. Smoot 2 and Marvin R. Natowicz 3

1 Children's Hospital Boston, United States
2 Children's Hospital, United States
3 Cleveland Clinic Foundation, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dita.obler.cgc{at}gmail.com.

Accepted 31 March 2008


*   Abstract

Background: Double outlet right ventricle (DORV), a clinically significant congenital heart defect, occurs in 1-3% percent of individuals with congenital heart defects. In contrast to other major congenital heart defects, there are no systematic or comprehensive data regarding associations, aetiologies, and pathogenesis of DORV. We analyzed reported cases in the medical literature to address these issues.

Methods: We queried the PubMed database using key words ï¿1/2double outlet right ventricleï¿1/2 and ï¿1/2DORVï¿1/2 for case reports, epidemiologic analyses and animal studies with this cardiac anomaly. The anatomic subtype of DORV was classified according to criteria of Van Praagh.

Results: Chromosomal abnormalities were present in 61 of the 149 cases of DORV. Trisomies 13 and 18, and del 22q11 were the most commonly associated cytogenetic lesions; different anatomic subtypes of DORV were noted in trisomies 13 and 18 vs. del 22q11. DORV was reported in many uncommon or rare non-chromosomal syndromes. Mutations and non-synonymous sequence variants in the CFC1 and CSX genes were the most commonly reported monogenic loci associated with DORV in humans; numerous genes are reported in murine models of DORV. Animal studies implicate maternal diabetes and prenatal exposure to ethanol, retinoids, theophylline, and valproate in DORV teratogenesis.

Conclusions: The large number of genes associated with DORV in both humans and animal models and the different anatomic subtypes seen in specific aetiologies indicate the likelihood of several distinct pathogenetic mechanisms for DORV, including impairment of neural crest derivative migration and impairment of normal cardiac situs and looping.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.